- Page 1 and 2: THE MORAL REASONING OF STUDENT ATHL
- Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Competitive, Respon
- Page 5: sport. The results of this study we
- Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER ONE Introduction What is it
- Page 11 and 12: college edifice, their paternalisti
- Page 13 and 14: are stronger adults because of the
- Page 15 and 16: purpose of higher education, which
- Page 17 and 18: dope or not dope as well as how ins
- Page 19 and 20: the athletic training facilities. T
- Page 21 and 22: Certified athletic trainers and ath
- Page 23 and 24: 5. What are the differences between
- Page 25 and 26: 4. Designer Drugs - A drug produced
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER TWO Literature Review The p
- Page 29 and 30: more of a look like German institut
- Page 31 and 32: institutions, conferences, and nati
- Page 33 and 34: the cultural norms as a measure of
- Page 35 and 36: “Moral reasoning, a systematic, l
- Page 37 and 38: describe the reasons for particular
- Page 39 and 40: it must be noted that only a low po
- Page 41 and 42: Taylor-Hanson, in review). However,
- Page 43 and 44: issues in sport or specific issues
- Page 45 and 46: naturally occurring male sex hormon
- Page 47 and 48: stored. After a few weeks, normal l
- Page 49 and 50: of what the supplement actually con
- Page 51 and 52: Despite the research and the warnin
- Page 53 and 54: use their judgment in discriminatin
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER THREE Methodology Research
- Page 57 and 58:
Ergogenic Aids and Moral Competence
- Page 59 and 60:
and then evaluated each of the thre
- Page 61 and 62:
Procedures Arrangements were made w
- Page 63 and 64:
CHAPTER FOUR Results The purpose of
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 2. Means and standard deviati
- Page 67 and 68:
I do not care whether Arnold choose
- Page 69 and 70:
Danny should do whatever will make
- Page 71 and 72:
Team Indiv. ATS F % F % F % Most co
- Page 73 and 74:
Most common reason not to take the
- Page 75 and 76:
Hypothesis Six No difference exists
- Page 77 and 78:
and find that low levels of moral r
- Page 79 and 80:
athletic training students did not
- Page 81 and 82:
another paper, the notions of care-
- Page 83 and 84:
esearch scored relatively low when
- Page 85 and 86:
Scenario five presented a similar s
- Page 87 and 88:
conversation and attitude speaks to
- Page 89 and 90:
consistent set of moral principles,
- Page 91 and 92:
REFERENCES Alder, P., & Alder, P.A.
- Page 93 and 94:
Beller, J.M., Stoll, S.K., Williams
- Page 95 and 96:
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J.,
- Page 97 and 98:
Honour, J.W. (2004). The fight for
- Page 99 and 100:
Perry, P.J., Lund, B.C., Deninger,
- Page 101 and 102:
Smith, R.A. (1988). Sports and Free
- Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX A HAHM - BELLER VALUES CHO
- Page 105 and 106:
APPENDIX B EAMCI Instrument Please
- Page 107 and 108:
2. George, while hanging out at the
- Page 109 and 110:
4. Tony is the kind of athletic tra
- Page 111 and 112:
APPENDIX C IRB approval 103