the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students
the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students
the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Results <strong>of</strong> Hahm-Beller Values Choice Inventory<br />
Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis One<br />
No difference exists by status in general sport <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong> using <strong>the</strong> HBVCI.<br />
× No significant difference was found (p < .05) by status on HBVCI scores for <strong>moral</strong><br />
<strong>reasoning</strong>. F (2,183) = .50, p = .61. Athletic <strong>training</strong> <strong>student</strong>s scored slightly higher (M =<br />
31.46 + 5.20) than both individual (M = 29.46 + 8.88) <strong>and</strong> team sport <strong>athletes</strong> (M = 29.01<br />
+ 9.43), although not significantly.<br />
Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Two<br />
No difference exists by gender <strong>of</strong> <strong>athletic</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>student</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>student</strong> <strong>athletes</strong> in general sport<br />
<strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong> using <strong>the</strong> HBVCI.<br />
× A significant difference was found (p < .05) by gender on HBVCI scores for <strong>moral</strong><br />
<strong>reasoning</strong>. F (1,183) = 11.78, p = .001. Females, regardless <strong>of</strong> status, (M = 32.93 + 8.11)<br />
scored significantly higher on <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong> compared to males (M = 25.92 + 8.20).<br />
Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Three<br />
No difference exists in <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> gender by status in general sport <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong> using<br />
<strong>the</strong> HBVCI.<br />
× No significant difference was found (p < .05) with <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> gender by status on<br />
HBVCI scores for <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong>. F (2,183) = 2.52, p = .08 (see Table 2).<br />
56