25.11.2014 Views

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Discriminant validity <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> what we are measuring is diverges from what we<br />

think it should be <strong>the</strong>oretically similar to. This is typically measured with a correlation. A low<br />

correlation may mean <strong>the</strong> Decision is a discriminant to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r questions.<br />

Table 1. Correlations for respondents’ decision choices on EAMCI<br />

Decision 1<br />

Decision 2<br />

Decision 3<br />

Decision 4a<br />

Decision 5<br />

Decision 1 Decision 2 Decision 3 Decision 4a Decision 5<br />

Pearson Correlation 1 .230(**) .166(*) .229(**) .289(**)<br />

Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .028 .002 .000<br />

N 174 174 174 174 174<br />

Pearson Correlation .230(**) 1 .255(**) .142 .310(**)<br />

Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .001 .062 .000<br />

N 174 174 174 174 174<br />

Pearson Correlation .166(*) .255(**) 1 .116 .292(**)<br />

Sig. (2-tailed) .028 .001 .127 .000<br />

N 174 174 174 174 174<br />

Pearson Correlation .229(**) .142 .116 1 .231(**)<br />

Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .062 .127 .002<br />

N 174 174 174 174 174<br />

Pearson Correlation .289(**) .310(**) .292(**) .231(**) 1<br />

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .002<br />

N 174 174 174 174 174<br />

** Correlation is significant at <strong>the</strong> 0.01 level (2-tailed).<br />

* Correlation is significant at <strong>the</strong> 0.05 level (2-tailed).<br />

Reliability<br />

Reliability refers to <strong>the</strong> consistency <strong>of</strong> scores. We would expect a respondent to attain <strong>the</strong><br />

same score regardless <strong>of</strong> where <strong>the</strong> respondent completed <strong>the</strong> EAMCI, when it was scored, <strong>and</strong><br />

who scored <strong>the</strong> response. For this instrument internal consistency was measured using Cronbach<br />

alpha. For this pilot study a Cronbach alpha <strong>of</strong> .60 was found.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!