25.11.2014 Views

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

only a small part. When an individual is faced with a <strong>moral</strong> decision he or she will progress<br />

through a <strong>reasoning</strong> process in determining <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> action. This cognitive process is when<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong>, determining what is right, why it is right <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> socio-<strong>moral</strong> principles that<br />

underlie what is right <strong>and</strong> why it is right (Kohlberg, 1981). This thinking process is not automatic<br />

<strong>and</strong>, according to researchers in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> cognitive <strong>moral</strong> development, can be altered.<br />

Gibbs (1993) emphasizes cognition, described by Rest (1994) as <strong>the</strong> thinking process <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> representations by which people construct reality <strong>and</strong> meaning as <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>moral</strong><br />

motivation. Gibbs states that cognitive development <strong>the</strong>ory began with <strong>the</strong> research <strong>of</strong> Jean<br />

Piaget. According to Piaget (1932), <strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong> mature <strong>moral</strong>ity is fairness <strong>and</strong> justice based<br />

on interaction with o<strong>the</strong>rs such as cooperating, sharing <strong>and</strong> competing (Gibbs, 1993). According<br />

to Gibbs, Piaget acknowledges that early stages <strong>of</strong> justice are obviously less mature. For<br />

example, such justifications as, “He hit me first,” <strong>and</strong> “Eye for an eye” are considered crude<br />

equality (Gibbs, 1993, p. 28). Piaget acknowledges <strong>the</strong> trend from superficial (physical) to<br />

intentions in <strong>the</strong> process to justice. (Gibbs, 1993; Piaget, 1932) Piaget was <strong>the</strong> first to establish a<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>moral</strong> development from non-<strong>moral</strong> to heteronomous <strong>and</strong> finally to autonomous. He<br />

argued that “The rule <strong>of</strong> justice is a sort <strong>of</strong> immanent condition <strong>of</strong> social relationships or a law<br />

governing <strong>the</strong>ir equilibrium” (Piaget, 1932, p. 32). According to Gibbs, “Heteronomous<br />

declarations may be readily ab<strong>and</strong>oned in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> adults, where egocentric impulses or<br />

desire are more salient than adult constraints.” (Gibbs, 1993, p. 30) Autonomous is a<br />

developmental <strong>moral</strong> level <strong>of</strong> cooperation <strong>and</strong> rational rules (Piaget, 1932).<br />

Rest (1994) gives much background information into <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> research <strong>of</strong> <strong>moral</strong><br />

development in a book called Moral Development in <strong>the</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions. According to Rest, in <strong>the</strong><br />

early 1950’s most people held a socialization view <strong>of</strong> <strong>moral</strong> development that used conformity to<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!