the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Significance of This Study First, if there is a correlation between the athletes’ scores on the Hahm-Beller Values Choice Inventory and the Ergogenic Aids Moral Competence Inventory it would help establish construct and convergent validity of the Ergogenic Aids Moral Competence Inventory. Along with other construct measures it would help in establishing that the Ergogenic Aids Moral Competence Inventory validly measures the moral reasoning of doping in sport. Second, while researchers have found that athletic training students morally reason similar to student athletes in general sport, this study could help in identifying how athletic training students may be similar or dissimilar to student athletes in their moral reasoning relative to doping in sport. If their reasoning is at similarly low levels identified in general sport moral reasoning, then researchers, administrators and educators may have a basis to include moral reasoning intervention programs specific to anti-doping in athletic training education programs. Third, this study may provide insight into the extent to which institutions of higher education and the NCAA meet their ideal stated purposes of developing character. In the current assessment focus of higher education, information from this study may help higher education and their athletic administrations better identify the extent of their character education goals, as well as help provide possible educational directions. 18
CHAPTER TWO Literature Review The purpose of this two part study is to: 1) conduct a pilot study for validation purposes of the Ergogenic Aids Moral Competence Inventory and 2) examine the general moral reasoning of Division I college student athletes’ and athletic training students’ compared with their moral reasoning about doping in sport as one measure of character development in higher education. The review of literature will provide a: 1) brief history of sport within the mission of higher education, 2) background into moral reasoning of athlete and athletic trainers, and 3) a brief history about doping in sport and why studying about moral reasoning and doping may be an important indicator of one component of character. Discussion about validty and reliability of the Ergogenic Aids Moral Competence Inventory will occur in chapter 3 under instrumentation. Brief History of Sport within the Mission of Higher Education It is beyond the scope of this study to examine in detail the social, cultural, political, and economic factors that drove the development of higher education in America. Therefore the purpose of this review is to examine the development of intercollegiate sport within the context of one of the stated missions of higher education, in particular the common mission between sport and higher education in terms of character development. In Colonial America, colleges were formed by churches, private individuals, and local as well as state governments. The colonial colleges were for the most part followed the European institutions that had been in existence for over 500 years (Cohen, 1998). One European model involved a classical liberal arts form and study of the natural sciences where students hired the faculty, set the curriculum and determined the standards for graduation. A second European model was developed within the church. For the most part, the mission of these institutions was 19
Page 1 and 2: THE MORAL REASONING OF STUDENT ATHL
Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Competitive, Respon
Page 5 and 6: sport. The results of this study we
Page 7 and 8: APPENDIX A ________________________
Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER ONE Introduction What is it
Page 11 and 12: college edifice, their paternalisti
Page 13 and 14: are stronger adults because of the
Page 15 and 16: purpose of higher education, which
Page 17 and 18: dope or not dope as well as how ins
Page 19 and 20: the athletic training facilities. T
Page 21 and 22: Certified athletic trainers and ath
Page 23 and 24: 5. What are the differences between
Page 25: 4. Designer Drugs - A drug produced
Page 29 and 30: more of a look like German institut
Page 31 and 32: institutions, conferences, and nati
Page 33 and 34: the cultural norms as a measure of
Page 35 and 36: “Moral reasoning, a systematic, l
Page 37 and 38: describe the reasons for particular
Page 39 and 40: it must be noted that only a low po
Page 41 and 42: Taylor-Hanson, in review). However,
Page 43 and 44: issues in sport or specific issues
Page 45 and 46: naturally occurring male sex hormon
Page 47 and 48: stored. After a few weeks, normal l
Page 49 and 50: of what the supplement actually con
Page 51 and 52: Despite the research and the warnin
Page 53 and 54: use their judgment in discriminatin
Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER THREE Methodology Research
Page 57 and 58: Ergogenic Aids and Moral Competence
Page 59 and 60: and then evaluated each of the thre
Page 61 and 62: Procedures Arrangements were made w
Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER FOUR Results The purpose of
Page 65 and 66: Table 2. Means and standard deviati
Page 67 and 68: I do not care whether Arnold choose
Page 69 and 70: Danny should do whatever will make
Page 71 and 72: Team Indiv. ATS F % F % F % Most co
Page 73 and 74: Most common reason not to take the
Page 75 and 76: Hypothesis Six No difference exists
Page 77 and 78:
and find that low levels of moral r
Page 79 and 80:
athletic training students did not
Page 81 and 82:
another paper, the notions of care-
Page 83 and 84:
esearch scored relatively low when
Page 85 and 86:
Scenario five presented a similar s
Page 87 and 88:
conversation and attitude speaks to
Page 89 and 90:
consistent set of moral principles,
Page 91 and 92:
REFERENCES Alder, P., & Alder, P.A.
Page 93 and 94:
Beller, J.M., Stoll, S.K., Williams
Page 95 and 96:
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J.,
Page 97 and 98:
Honour, J.W. (2004). The fight for
Page 99 and 100:
Perry, P.J., Lund, B.C., Deninger,
Page 101 and 102:
Smith, R.A. (1988). Sports and Free
Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX A HAHM - BELLER VALUES CHO
Page 105 and 106:
APPENDIX B EAMCI Instrument Please
Page 107 and 108:
2. George, while hanging out at the
Page 109 and 110:
4. Tony is the kind of athletic tra
Page 111 and 112:
APPENDIX C IRB approval 103
show all

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?