25.11.2014 Views

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACCESSIBILTY POLICY OMISSION<br />

Objections to Draft Deposit<br />

Ref No a b c d Name Agent Response Ref.<br />

021 O 001 OM Rotary Ltd WMBC 021 OM<br />

093 O 001 OM General Aviation Awareness <strong>Council</strong> WMBC 093 OM<br />

394 O 002 OM Crankwood, Abram and Lowton Bridleways WMBC 394 OM<br />

395 O 001 OM Leigh, Atherton, Astley and Tyldesley WMBC 395 OM<br />

418 O 026 OM GMPTE WMBC 418 OM<br />

Main Issues<br />

Whether the chapter of the RDD which relates to accessibility is appropriate, having<br />

regard to:<br />

• the omission of a policy relating to the provision of heliports;<br />

• the need to safeguard former railway lines for potential future communication<br />

routes;<br />

• the interests of horse riders.<br />

Inspector’s Considerations and Conclusions<br />

The omission of a policy relating to the provision of heliports<br />

10.182 Objectors argue that the UDP should contain a policy/proposal to promote<br />

the development of heliports. These would, the objectors contend, enable more rapid<br />

communication with Manchester Airport and other important centres and transport hubs.<br />

They would be of significant benefit to the local business community and would broaden<br />

the scope for recreational activity. For these reasons such a facility would support<br />

economic regeneration and provide necessary social infrastructure. PPG13 (annex B,<br />

paragraph 5) advises that LPAs will need to consider the role of small airfields in serving<br />

businesses, recreational, training and emergency services needs.<br />

10.183 The LPA acknowledges the potential benefits of such a development. It<br />

included such a policy in the currently adopted UDP, but since its adoption date of 1996<br />

no proposals for such a development have been forthcoming. There is no basis, therefore,<br />

for a conclusion that such a development is likely during the period of the replacement<br />

UDP. If a planning application was submitted for a heliport the provisions of policies<br />

G1A(a), A1, A1A and A1B would provide the basis for its determination. For these<br />

reasons I conclude that a specific policy is not required to either promote the provision of<br />

heliports or to form the basis for the determination of related planning applications.<br />

The need to safeguard former railway lines for potential future communication routes<br />

10.184 An objector argues that disused railway lines in the Borough should be<br />

safeguarded from development which would prejudice their future use as transport routes.<br />

440

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!