A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ACCESSIBILTY POLICY OMISSION<br />
Objections to Draft Deposit<br />
Ref No a b c d Name Agent Response Ref.<br />
021 O 001 OM Rotary Ltd WMBC 021 OM<br />
093 O 001 OM General Aviation Awareness <strong>Council</strong> WMBC 093 OM<br />
394 O 002 OM Crankwood, Abram and Lowton Bridleways WMBC 394 OM<br />
395 O 001 OM Leigh, Atherton, Astley and Tyldesley WMBC 395 OM<br />
418 O 026 OM GMPTE WMBC 418 OM<br />
Main Issues<br />
Whether the chapter of the RDD which relates to accessibility is appropriate, having<br />
regard to:<br />
• the omission of a policy relating to the provision of heliports;<br />
• the need to safeguard former railway lines for potential future communication<br />
routes;<br />
• the interests of horse riders.<br />
Inspector’s Considerations and Conclusions<br />
The omission of a policy relating to the provision of heliports<br />
10.182 Objectors argue that the UDP should contain a policy/proposal to promote<br />
the development of heliports. These would, the objectors contend, enable more rapid<br />
communication with Manchester Airport and other important centres and transport hubs.<br />
They would be of significant benefit to the local business community and would broaden<br />
the scope for recreational activity. For these reasons such a facility would support<br />
economic regeneration and provide necessary social infrastructure. PPG13 (annex B,<br />
paragraph 5) advises that LPAs will need to consider the role of small airfields in serving<br />
businesses, recreational, training and emergency services needs.<br />
10.183 The LPA acknowledges the potential benefits of such a development. It<br />
included such a policy in the currently adopted UDP, but since its adoption date of 1996<br />
no proposals for such a development have been forthcoming. There is no basis, therefore,<br />
for a conclusion that such a development is likely during the period of the replacement<br />
UDP. If a planning application was submitted for a heliport the provisions of policies<br />
G1A(a), A1, A1A and A1B would provide the basis for its determination. For these<br />
reasons I conclude that a specific policy is not required to either promote the provision of<br />
heliports or to form the basis for the determination of related planning applications.<br />
The need to safeguard former railway lines for potential future communication routes<br />
10.184 An objector argues that disused railway lines in the Borough should be<br />
safeguarded from development which would prejudice their future use as transport routes.<br />
440