25.11.2014 Views

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

process. PPG13 (annex D) advises that, for land uses not covered by its standards (such<br />

as housing), the most stringent regional or local standards should apply. The specific<br />

disparity between the standard for 2+ bedroom flats and 3-bedroom dwellings is<br />

accounted for by the consideration that, within a development containing a number of<br />

flats where communal parking areas are provided, it is possible to apply an average figure<br />

such as 1.5 spaces per dwelling, but for individual dwellings the car spaces must be based<br />

on whole numbers.<br />

10.176 The LPA clarifies that, for dwelling houses, it does not count a garage<br />

within a residential curtilage as a car space because many people use these for storage.<br />

This approach provides occupiers with a degree of choice as to how they use the space<br />

around their dwelling, allowing an increase up to 2 on-site car spaces if this is needed in<br />

the particular case. This approach would still, having regard to the range of dwelling<br />

types, allow the overall average of 1.5 car spaces per dwelling to be not exceeded. In the<br />

interests of clarity, however, this important aspect of the application of standards should<br />

be referred to in the UDP.<br />

The appropriate parking standards for stadia<br />

10.177 An objector considers that the parking standards for stadia, as presented in<br />

Appendix 9, are unreasonably low. The reasoned justification to policy A1S informs,<br />

however, that it is possible for a developer to provide parking in excess of the maximum<br />

standards if this is justified by a Transport Assessment. The UDP, therefore, provides the<br />

flexibility to respond to exceptional circumstances in respect of parking provision.<br />

Grammatical aspects<br />

10.178 The second element of the policy presents various factors to which regard<br />

is to be had when deciding whether it is acceptable to depart from stated parking<br />

standards. An objector proposes changes to the wording of criterion (iii) which would<br />

replace ‘without’ with ‘whose use would not cause’ and the word ‘and’ with ‘or’. These<br />

would not materially improve its comprehension. Within the second paragraph of the<br />

reasoned justification the word ‘sets’ should be modified to ‘set’ in order to secure<br />

consistency with the plural term ‘criteria’.<br />

Recommendation<br />

I recommend:<br />

(REC 10.24) that the RDD be modified to secure that the explanatory text to<br />

Appendix 9 clarifies that the LPA does not regard garages within a residential<br />

curtilage as an off-street parking space for the purposes of applying the maximum<br />

car parking standards.<br />

436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!