A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
household type, the type of housing and its location. Objectors argue that the LPA has<br />
failed to do this. These factors are, in practice, difficult to reflect in a policy because the<br />
LPA has no control over the identity of the individuals and households who occupy<br />
particular dwellings. PPG3 recognises this by limiting its provisions to the advice that<br />
LPAs should allow for significantly lower levels of off-street parking provision,<br />
particularly for developments in locations such as town centres where services are readily<br />
available by walking, cycling or public transport, or which provide housing for elderly<br />
people, single people and students where demand for car parking is likely to be less than<br />
for family housing. The UDP standards do conform to this advice by providing for less<br />
car parking space in town centre developments than in out-of-centre ones, and for single<br />
bed and sheltered accommodation as compared with larger dwellings.<br />
10.172 PPG3 advises that car parking standards that result, on average, in<br />
development with more than 1.5 off-street car parking spaces per dwelling are unlikely to<br />
reflect the Government’s emphasis on securing sustainable environments. Policies which<br />
would result in higher levels of off-street parking, especially in urban areas, should not be<br />
adopted. A subsequent Ministerial Statement has clarified that PPG3 envisages that the<br />
average of 1.5 car spaces is to be taken over the whole of an LPAs area. Objectors argue<br />
that this does not necessarily mean that developments above this average will harm this<br />
objective. The RDD standards reflect that view by providing that, for dwelling houses<br />
with 4 or more bedrooms, 2 car spaces would be appropriate.<br />
10.173 There is no basis for a conclusion that the maximum standards provided<br />
for dwelling houses, i.e. 1 per 3 dwellings for sheltered housing; 1 per dwelling for single<br />
bed dwellings and flats in town centres and dwelling houses of up to 3 bedrooms; 1.5 per<br />
dwelling for 2 + bedroom flats outside town centres and 2 per dwelling for 4 + bedroom<br />
dwellings would result in this overall average of 1.5 off-street spaces per dwelling being<br />
exceeded within new housing developments across the LPA area as a whole. Objectors<br />
argue that additional provision should be made for visitors’ car parking spaces. My<br />
interpretation of the advice of PPG3 is that this is to be provided within the overall<br />
average of 1.5 off-street car spaces per dwelling. I conclude that the LPA’s car parking<br />
standards are in conformity with the advice of PPG3.<br />
10.174 Objectors regard the prescription of rigid standards as inappropriate in<br />
principle. They note that the reference within PPG3 to 1.5 off-street car parking spaces<br />
per dwelling is expressed as an average. It is necessary, however, for the LPA to<br />
prescribe specific standards for particular categories of housing development to achieve<br />
this average. LPAs are advised to revise their parking standards to allow for significantly<br />
lower levels of off-street parking provision than in the past. It is still necessary, therefore,<br />
for the LPA to define clear standards of some sort.<br />
10.175 Objectors argue that it is illogical for the standards to require a maximum<br />
of 1.5 car spaces per 2+ bedroom flat outside a town centre but a maximum of only 1 car<br />
space per 3-bedroom dwelling. The explanatory text to Appendix 9 informs that the<br />
parking standards are based on Greater Manchester-wide standards developed in<br />
partnership with the Greater Manchester districts through the Local Transport Plan<br />
435