25.11.2014 Views

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

household type, the type of housing and its location. Objectors argue that the LPA has<br />

failed to do this. These factors are, in practice, difficult to reflect in a policy because the<br />

LPA has no control over the identity of the individuals and households who occupy<br />

particular dwellings. PPG3 recognises this by limiting its provisions to the advice that<br />

LPAs should allow for significantly lower levels of off-street parking provision,<br />

particularly for developments in locations such as town centres where services are readily<br />

available by walking, cycling or public transport, or which provide housing for elderly<br />

people, single people and students where demand for car parking is likely to be less than<br />

for family housing. The UDP standards do conform to this advice by providing for less<br />

car parking space in town centre developments than in out-of-centre ones, and for single<br />

bed and sheltered accommodation as compared with larger dwellings.<br />

10.172 PPG3 advises that car parking standards that result, on average, in<br />

development with more than 1.5 off-street car parking spaces per dwelling are unlikely to<br />

reflect the Government’s emphasis on securing sustainable environments. Policies which<br />

would result in higher levels of off-street parking, especially in urban areas, should not be<br />

adopted. A subsequent Ministerial Statement has clarified that PPG3 envisages that the<br />

average of 1.5 car spaces is to be taken over the whole of an LPAs area. Objectors argue<br />

that this does not necessarily mean that developments above this average will harm this<br />

objective. The RDD standards reflect that view by providing that, for dwelling houses<br />

with 4 or more bedrooms, 2 car spaces would be appropriate.<br />

10.173 There is no basis for a conclusion that the maximum standards provided<br />

for dwelling houses, i.e. 1 per 3 dwellings for sheltered housing; 1 per dwelling for single<br />

bed dwellings and flats in town centres and dwelling houses of up to 3 bedrooms; 1.5 per<br />

dwelling for 2 + bedroom flats outside town centres and 2 per dwelling for 4 + bedroom<br />

dwellings would result in this overall average of 1.5 off-street spaces per dwelling being<br />

exceeded within new housing developments across the LPA area as a whole. Objectors<br />

argue that additional provision should be made for visitors’ car parking spaces. My<br />

interpretation of the advice of PPG3 is that this is to be provided within the overall<br />

average of 1.5 off-street car spaces per dwelling. I conclude that the LPA’s car parking<br />

standards are in conformity with the advice of PPG3.<br />

10.174 Objectors regard the prescription of rigid standards as inappropriate in<br />

principle. They note that the reference within PPG3 to 1.5 off-street car parking spaces<br />

per dwelling is expressed as an average. It is necessary, however, for the LPA to<br />

prescribe specific standards for particular categories of housing development to achieve<br />

this average. LPAs are advised to revise their parking standards to allow for significantly<br />

lower levels of off-street parking provision than in the past. It is still necessary, therefore,<br />

for the LPA to define clear standards of some sort.<br />

10.175 Objectors argue that it is illogical for the standards to require a maximum<br />

of 1.5 car spaces per 2+ bedroom flat outside a town centre but a maximum of only 1 car<br />

space per 3-bedroom dwelling. The explanatory text to Appendix 9 informs that the<br />

parking standards are based on Greater Manchester-wide standards developed in<br />

partnership with the Greater Manchester districts through the Local Transport Plan<br />

435

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!