A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
at food stores, where car parks could be used by town and district centre shoppers,<br />
thereby facilitating linked trips.<br />
10.164 Under the terms of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004,<br />
RPG13 has become the Interim Regional Spatial Strategy. It is, therefore, part of the<br />
development plan for each relevant LPA area and has the full weight of s38(6). For this<br />
reason, and because it is addressed more closely to local circumstances, it should be<br />
given more weight than the advice of PPG13. PPG13 itself (paragraph 53) advises that<br />
Regional Planning Bodies and LPAs may adopt more rigorous standards than those set<br />
out in PPG13 (annex D) where this is appropriate.<br />
10.165 PPG13 (paragraph 54) advises that, for individual developments, car<br />
parking provision above maximum standards may be permitted where the need for this<br />
has been demonstrated through a Transport Assessment. This is reflected in the second<br />
paragraph of the reasoned justification to policy A1S. An objector contends that the<br />
reasoned justification text is an over-generalised version of the advice of PPG13<br />
(paragraph 54) but, in my view, it is a fair representation of it. An objector argues that the<br />
UDP should provide guidance on how a Transport Assessment would demonstrate the<br />
requirement for extra parking and how this would be linked to Travel Plans and other<br />
initiatives to promote modal shift. In my view it is sufficient for the RDD to require that a<br />
Transport Assessment be used to demonstrate why parking in excess of the maximum<br />
standards is needed. The detailed measures to be employed in the assessment will vary<br />
from one scheme to another and are best determined at development control stage.<br />
The encouragement of reduced parking provision<br />
10.166 An objector argues that the UDP should encourage reduced parking<br />
provision in areas well served by public transport or existing parking spaces. It should<br />
consider the use of shared car parking in appropriate circumstances. The second element<br />
of policy A1S does this. It provides that the scope for providing car parking below the<br />
maximum standard will be considered against the factors of accessibility of the site by<br />
public transport and the availability of off-street and on-street parking spaces. These<br />
latter categories of car parking are of a type which would be likely to be shared.<br />
The relevance of maximum parking standards<br />
10.167 An objector notes the reference to maximum car parking standards in both<br />
policy A1S and Appendix 9. He argues that, as a general principle, these should be<br />
replaced with minimum standards. The references to maximum parking standards are,<br />
however, soundly based on the advice of PPG13 (paragraph 52) that policies in<br />
development plans should set maximum levels of parking for broad classes of<br />
development.<br />
433