25.11.2014 Views

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

A1P (1) MAJOR HIGHWAY SCHEMES - A5225 ... - Wigan Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A1R <strong>HIGHWAY</strong> ACCESS - NEW DEVELOPMENT<br />

Objections to Draft Deposit<br />

Ref No a b c d Name Agent Response Ref.<br />

457 O 009 A 1R Highways Agency WMBC 457<br />

572 O 029 A 1R Peter Sargeant FRTPI WIGAN MBC 572/A<br />

Objections to Revised Deposit<br />

Ref No a B c d Name Agent Response Ref.<br />

457 O 016 A 1R Highways Agency WMBC 457<br />

747 O 112 A 1R <strong>Wigan</strong> Borough Action Group WIGAN MBC 747/A<br />

Main Issues<br />

Whether this policy is appropriate, having regard to:<br />

• the protection of the trunk road network;<br />

• action prior to the submission of a planning application;<br />

• the relative priority to be afforded to wheelchair users.<br />

Inspector’s Considerations and Conclusions<br />

The protection of the trunk road network<br />

10.157 Policy A1R requires new development to facilitate safe and convenient<br />

access for all road vehicles in a way which is compatible with the hierarchy of<br />

accessibility and good urban design. An objector, at FDD stage, argues that policy A1R<br />

does not provide adequate protection for the safe and efficient operation of the trunk road<br />

network. At RDD stage the LPA has inserted in the reasoned justification a paragraph<br />

which informs that direct access on to the trunk road network will be restricted and<br />

developers will need to contact the Highways Agency at an early stage about any<br />

development that may directly or indirectly affect a trunk road. Such early contact will<br />

enable the Highways Agency to inform the prospective developer of the stringent<br />

restrictions on access which apply in such situations and of the implications, for the<br />

particular scheme, of DTLR Circular 04/2001.<br />

10.158 The same objector, at RDD stage, contends that this text still leaves it<br />

unclear when the Highways Agency should be consulted and what roads are actually<br />

trunk roads. The LPA has no formal standing in relation to emerging schemes of<br />

development until a planning application has been submitted. Once that happens the<br />

established procedures for consultation will be applied. It is for that reason that, in its<br />

reasoned justification to policy A1R, the LPA is restricted to advising that developers<br />

should contact the Highways Agency at an early stage and omits reference to a particular<br />

time-table.<br />

430

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!