Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
used. A rub-down of the person may be conducted, with their consent, if an<br />
officer has reasonable grounds to believe they possess an unauthorised item.<br />
Those who refuse these searches, must be refused admission or access to a<br />
prisoner.<br />
In relation to staff, a staff member‟s locker may be searched for the purposes<br />
of detecting unauthorised items. Searches must have the prior approval of<br />
the prison manager, <strong>and</strong> must be undertaken by two staff (s100). The staff<br />
member must also be advised of the proposed search, <strong>and</strong> has the right to be<br />
present during the search.<br />
If an officer has grounds to believe that a visitor or staff member is in<br />
possession of a controlled drug, they may detain that person, use reasonable<br />
physical force <strong>and</strong> promptly call the police. A person must not be detained for<br />
more than four hours (s103). Finally, any vehicle brought into a prison can be<br />
stopped <strong>and</strong> searched for unauthorised items or attempted escapees.<br />
Reasonable force can be used for the purposes of executing this search<br />
(s101).<br />
Issues<br />
In 2009, the Ombudsmen upheld a complaint concerning a situation where<br />
prisoners were required to squat during strip searches in circumstances where<br />
that requirement was not permitted by legislation (Ombudsmen‟s Office,<br />
2009:14). Further information on strip searches, with regards to women, can<br />
be found in section 8.3. There is clearly a need for further research across<br />
this whole area.<br />
7.4 Segregation<br />
Law <strong>and</strong> policy framework<br />
The Corrections Act provides for the segregation of prisoners for the purposes<br />
of: medical oversight (s60), protective custody (s59(1)), <strong>and</strong> security, good<br />
order or safety (s58).<br />
Segregation linked to medical oversight can be undertaken to assess or<br />
ensure a prisoner‟s mental or physical health (including the risk of self-harm).<br />
If this segregation is undertaken, the prisoner <strong>and</strong> chief executive must be<br />
informed, <strong>and</strong> given the reasons for segregation, in writing. Decisions to end<br />
segregation must be made by a medical officer. During segregation, the<br />
prisoner must be visited by a health professional at least once a day (twice a<br />
day if the prisoner is viewed as at risk of self-harm).<br />
Protective custody segregation can be undertaken on a voluntary or a directed<br />
(non-voluntary) basis. Protective segregation may be instigated where: the<br />
prisoner requests it <strong>and</strong> the manager considers it is in the best interests of the<br />
prisoner; or the manager is satisfied that the safety of the prisoner has been<br />
put at risk by another person <strong>and</strong> there is no reasonable way to ensure the<br />
74