25.11.2014 Views

Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

used. A rub-down of the person may be conducted, with their consent, if an<br />

officer has reasonable grounds to believe they possess an unauthorised item.<br />

Those who refuse these searches, must be refused admission or access to a<br />

prisoner.<br />

In relation to staff, a staff member‟s locker may be searched for the purposes<br />

of detecting unauthorised items. Searches must have the prior approval of<br />

the prison manager, <strong>and</strong> must be undertaken by two staff (s100). The staff<br />

member must also be advised of the proposed search, <strong>and</strong> has the right to be<br />

present during the search.<br />

If an officer has grounds to believe that a visitor or staff member is in<br />

possession of a controlled drug, they may detain that person, use reasonable<br />

physical force <strong>and</strong> promptly call the police. A person must not be detained for<br />

more than four hours (s103). Finally, any vehicle brought into a prison can be<br />

stopped <strong>and</strong> searched for unauthorised items or attempted escapees.<br />

Reasonable force can be used for the purposes of executing this search<br />

(s101).<br />

Issues<br />

In 2009, the Ombudsmen upheld a complaint concerning a situation where<br />

prisoners were required to squat during strip searches in circumstances where<br />

that requirement was not permitted by legislation (Ombudsmen‟s Office,<br />

2009:14). Further information on strip searches, with regards to women, can<br />

be found in section 8.3. There is clearly a need for further research across<br />

this whole area.<br />

7.4 Segregation<br />

Law <strong>and</strong> policy framework<br />

The Corrections Act provides for the segregation of prisoners for the purposes<br />

of: medical oversight (s60), protective custody (s59(1)), <strong>and</strong> security, good<br />

order or safety (s58).<br />

Segregation linked to medical oversight can be undertaken to assess or<br />

ensure a prisoner‟s mental or physical health (including the risk of self-harm).<br />

If this segregation is undertaken, the prisoner <strong>and</strong> chief executive must be<br />

informed, <strong>and</strong> given the reasons for segregation, in writing. Decisions to end<br />

segregation must be made by a medical officer. During segregation, the<br />

prisoner must be visited by a health professional at least once a day (twice a<br />

day if the prisoner is viewed as at risk of self-harm).<br />

Protective custody segregation can be undertaken on a voluntary or a directed<br />

(non-voluntary) basis. Protective segregation may be instigated where: the<br />

prisoner requests it <strong>and</strong> the manager considers it is in the best interests of the<br />

prisoner; or the manager is satisfied that the safety of the prisoner has been<br />

put at risk by another person <strong>and</strong> there is no reasonable way to ensure the<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!