Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
education. These included: it provided something to do; was a way to<br />
positively focus the mind; developed positive mental health; bolstered selfesteem;<br />
gave confidence; improved relations with prison staff; improved<br />
relations with other prisoners; <strong>and</strong> built opportunities for the prisoner (<strong>and</strong> their<br />
family) on release. Educational classes had important short <strong>and</strong> long-term<br />
effects.<br />
The UN Special Rapporteur on Education (2009:s4) has recently confirmed<br />
these outcomes for educational programmes but also argues that education is<br />
an „imperative in its own right‟. For the Special Rapporteur, education enables<br />
„positive change <strong>and</strong> human capacity‟ (ibid:s10); it is a means for prisoners to<br />
fulfil their potential. For these reasons, education should be a central feature<br />
of prison life.<br />
Despite the potential of education to secure a number of positive outcomes,<br />
international commentators have indicated that there remain many barriers to<br />
education in prisons. The UN Special Rapporteur (ibid), as well as Jones <strong>and</strong><br />
Pike (2010) have noted:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Negative attitudes – particularly of politicians <strong>and</strong> policy-makers, such<br />
that prisoners are viewed as not deserving of education services;<br />
Experiential barriers – that prisoners have low self-esteem, or learning<br />
difficulties that inhibit their progress;<br />
Institutional issues – education is undermined by: lockdowns; prisoner<br />
transfers; poor libraries; lack of educational material; long waiting lists<br />
for courses; lack of IT training; lack of teaching staff or support staff;<br />
the withdrawal of education as a punishment measure; prisoners<br />
having to self-fund education; discrimination of access dependent on<br />
sentence length, classification, <strong>and</strong> so on; dated vocational courses;<br />
<strong>and</strong>, the lack of awareness about learning difficulties <strong>and</strong> the means to<br />
approach them.<br />
In New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, Baragwanath (2009) argues that few young prisoners receive<br />
their educational entitlement, <strong>and</strong> that this breaches their educational rights.<br />
She notes a number of deficiencies, including that:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Prison teachers do not work under a secondary school hierarchy;<br />
Prisoners have restricted school times <strong>and</strong> no formal homework time;<br />
Prisoners are given no incentive to continue learning post 16th<br />
birthday, <strong>and</strong> consequently those aged 17 or 18 tend to miss out on<br />
education;<br />
In January 2009, just 130 prisoners were enrolled in correspondence<br />
school;<br />
It is almost impossible for those on rem<strong>and</strong> to receive education, even<br />
if they have lengthy rem<strong>and</strong> periods;<br />
If prisoners wish to access courses with the Open Polytechnic, they<br />
have to get a student loan to assist with their fees. This impacts<br />
negatively on their situation post-release.<br />
49