Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Human Rights and Prisons - Rethinking Crime and Punishment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
On a financial level, this increasing prisoner population has notable<br />
implications. In 2009/10, the cost of imprisoning a person for one day was<br />
$249.14 (increased from $155.68 per day in 2003/04); this results in an<br />
annual cost of $90,936 2 (Department of Corrections, 2008b, 2010b). The<br />
Treasury (2010) estimated that, during 2010-2011, Corrections would spend<br />
over $750mn on the detention of sentenced <strong>and</strong> rem<strong>and</strong> prisoners. Treasury<br />
also warned that the growing prison population could cost up to $1.566bn<br />
over the next nine years (Gower, 2009). In 2009, Corrections were provided<br />
with $145.8mn to implement further double-bunking; $255.4mn to cover<br />
operational costs (such as employing more frontline staff, <strong>and</strong> providing more<br />
programmes, food, bedding, clothing, healthcare <strong>and</strong> transportation); <strong>and</strong><br />
$24mn to exp<strong>and</strong> prison capacity (Department of Corrections, 2009a). While<br />
these are, undoubtedly, sizeable sums – particularly when compared to<br />
community-based sentences – the Department is operating under financial<br />
restraint.<br />
The Department of Corrections (2008:22) detail that this expansion is<br />
dovetailed with the need to renovate a „significant proportion‟ of the prison<br />
estate as certain „facilities can no longer be regarded as fit for purpose, with<br />
some being at risk of non-compliance with relevant building st<strong>and</strong>ards‟. This<br />
expansion also impacts on the range of facilities required within the prisons –<br />
such as receiving offices, prisoner health units or at-risk units. As the<br />
Department (ibid) further noted, „At some prisons such facilities are already<br />
inadequate, relative to the total number of prisoners on the site‟.<br />
3.3 The Re-introduction of Private <strong>Prisons</strong><br />
Concerns about rising costs, in the face of increased prisoner populations, are<br />
among the reasons leading to the reintroduction of private enterprise in prison<br />
management. The Corrections (Contract Management of <strong>Prisons</strong>)<br />
Amendment Act 2009 enables prison management to be contracted to private<br />
parties. In the 2010/11 financial round, it is estimated that $12.9mn will be<br />
dedicated to prepare for <strong>and</strong> manage contracts for private prisons (The<br />
Treasury, 2010). Related prison construction, between 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2018, is<br />
expected to cost over $1.5bn.<br />
Thus far, two main sites will be contracted out. These will be the new prison<br />
at Wiri (a 1,000 bed male prison that is expected to be operational by 2014)<br />
<strong>and</strong> the redeveloped Mount Eden/Auckl<strong>and</strong> Central Rem<strong>and</strong> Prison. In the<br />
latter case, two new accommodation buildings, one being eight storeys high,<br />
opened in March 2011 <strong>and</strong> the prison is run by Serco.<br />
The application of a business model to the running of prisons has been the<br />
subject of much debate, not least because it raises a major ethical question –<br />
to what extent should private companies profit from the pains of<br />
imprisonment? In the USA, UK <strong>and</strong> Australia, a number of firms – such as<br />
2 This is compared to the costs of a community-based offender. In 2007/08, the daily cost of<br />
community-based sentences was $10.04 (increased from $8.65 in 2003/04). This results in<br />
an annual cost of $3,664 (Department of Corrections, 2008b).<br />
20