25.11.2014 Views

FrogLog 103 PDF here - Amphibian Specialist Group

FrogLog 103 PDF here - Amphibian Specialist Group

FrogLog 103 PDF here - Amphibian Specialist Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effects of flow regimes altered<br />

by dams on survival population<br />

declines, and range-wide losses of<br />

California river-breeding frogs<br />

By Sarah J. Kupferberg, Wendy J. Palen, Amy J.<br />

Lind, Steve Bobzien, Alessandro Catenazzi, Joe<br />

Drennan & Mary E. Power<br />

Widespread alteration of natural<br />

hydrologic patterns by large dams<br />

combined with peak demands for power<br />

and water delivery during summer months<br />

have resulted in frequent aseasonal flow<br />

pulses in rivers of western North America.<br />

Native species in these ecosystems have<br />

evolved with predictable annual flooddrought<br />

cycles; thus, individuals and<br />

populations are vulnerable to disruption<br />

of the seasonal synchrony between stable<br />

low-flow conditions and reproduction. We<br />

evaluated whether altered flow regimes<br />

affected two native frogs in California and<br />

Oregon (U.S.A.) at four spatial and temporal<br />

extents. At the two largest geographic and<br />

time scales we examined changes in species<br />

distribution over approximately 50 years<br />

and compared current population density<br />

between 11 regulated and 16 unregulated<br />

rivers. At two finer scales, we assessed<br />

temporal trends in abundance among<br />

populations occupying rivers with different<br />

hydrologic histories, and related withinyear<br />

patterns of early life stage survival to<br />

seasonal hydrology. The Foothill yellow<br />

legged frog (Rana boylii) breeds only in<br />

flowing water and is more likely to be absent<br />

downstream of large dams than in freeflowing<br />

rivers. Breeding populations are<br />

on average five times smaller in regulated<br />

rivers than in unregulated rivers. Time<br />

series data (range = 8 − 19 years) from five<br />

populations of yellow legged frogs and two<br />

populations of California red-legged frogs<br />

(R. draytonii) across a gradient of natural<br />

to highly artificial timing and magnitude<br />

of flooding indicate that a key flow-regime<br />

attribute is variability of flows in spring and<br />

summer. Extreme flow fluctuations due to<br />

pulsed releases from dams, rapid cessation<br />

of spills and natural storm events were<br />

strongly correlated with high mortality<br />

of embryos and tadpoles by scouring<br />

and stranding. Subsequent decreases in<br />

densities of adult females followed after a<br />

lag corresponding to the time for affected<br />

cohorts to reach reproductive maturity. To<br />

balance the increasing demands for water<br />

and hydroelectric power with conservation<br />

of these frogs and other species with similar<br />

phenology, dam operations that better<br />

mimic natural flow timing are needed.<br />

S. J., Kupferberg, et al., Cons. Bio. 26, 513<br />

(2012).<br />

Frog population viability under<br />

present and future climate<br />

conditions: a Bayesian state-space<br />

approach<br />

By Rebecca McCaffery, Antti Solonen &<br />

Elizabeth Crone<br />

World-wide extinctions of amphibians<br />

are at the forefront of the<br />

biodiversity crisis, with climate change<br />

figuring prominently as a potential driver<br />

of continued amphibian decline. As in other<br />

taxa, changes in both the mean and variability<br />

of climate conditions may affect amphibian<br />

populations in complex, unpredictable<br />

ways. In western North America, climate<br />

The Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris) is a pondbreeding<br />

amphibian found at a range of elevations in<br />

western North America. In a high elevation population<br />

of this species in Montana, USA, we found that future<br />

decreases in snowpack are forecast to increase<br />

population viability. Photo: Rebecca McCaffery.<br />

Locations (a) of focal watersheds in California (Alameda Creek, north fork [NF] of the Feather River, south fork<br />

[SF] of the Eel River) and average clutch densities (circles) w<strong>here</strong> breeding censuses of Foothill yellow-legged frog<br />

(Rana boylii) (b) have been conducted in regulated and unregulated rivers. Clutches (c) are attached to rocks, and<br />

remain visible if stranded (d) or until hatching (e). Photo: A. Catenazzi & J. Drennan.<br />

models predict a reduced duration and<br />

extent of mountain snowpack and increased<br />

variability in precipitation, which may have<br />

consequences for amphibians inhabiting<br />

montane ecosystems. We used Bayesian<br />

capture–recapture methods to estimate<br />

survival and transition probabilities<br />

in a high-elevation population of the<br />

Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris)<br />

over 10 years and related these rates to<br />

interannual variation in peak snowpack.<br />

Then, we forecasted frog population<br />

growth and viability under a range of<br />

scenarios with varying levels of change in<br />

mean and variance in snowpack. Over a<br />

range of future scenarios, changes in mean<br />

snowpack had a greater effect on viability<br />

than changes in the variance of snowpack,<br />

with forecasts largely predicting an increase<br />

in population viability. Population models<br />

based on snowpack during our study period<br />

predicted a declining population. Although<br />

mean conditions were more important for<br />

viability than variance, for a given mean<br />

snowpack depth, increases in variability<br />

could change a population from increasing<br />

to decreasing. T<strong>here</strong>fore, the influence of<br />

changing climate variability on populations<br />

should be accounted for in predictive<br />

models. The Bayesian modelling framework<br />

<strong>FrogLog</strong> 20 (4) | Issue number <strong>103</strong> (July 2012) | 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!