sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
Business impacts Summary S6: Pitt Street (one option) Traffic efficiency All options would be comparable in terms of their construction impacts; however it is possible that ‘option c’ would take less time to construct. It would therefore have less of an impact on existing bus services and travel times due to its potential shorter construction period. ‘Option c’ also benefits from its smaller construction footprint, which would cause less disruption to road users, bus users, pedestrians, adjacent businesses and buildings and the community. In summary, the purpose of improving Broadway and Wattle Street would be to reallocate traffic onto Wattle Street from Broadway in order to reduce traffic volumes on George Street so as to benefit road users. This would be best achieved by providing the most attractive diverge and merge arrangement between the two roads, which is achieved under ‘option a’. In this way, ‘option a’ would best meet the overall proposal objective of supporting growing demand for access to the city centre and improving road network functionality in future years. ‘Option a’ would also have more benefits for pedestrian amenity, capacity and kerbside use allocations than ‘option b’, and ‘option d’ and a potentially greater benefit than ‘option c’ in this regard. This is despite its potential longer construction program and wider construction footprint compared to ‘option c’. ‘Option a’ therefore performed best against the proposal objectives and evaluation criteria. The option would introduce traffic efficiencies, reduce congestion and improve traffic flows for this priority corridor for northbound traffic entering the city from George Street and Pitt Street at this location. Amenity Kerbside use Business impacts Summary This improvement would prioritise demand on the intersection during peak periods. The option would improve the road user experience for traffic by setting priorities at the intersection and improving traffic flows into George Street and Pitt Street from the south. The provided solution would result in no kerbside allocation changes. The reconfiguration of the intersection would not affect any loading zones, whilst it would benefit business traffic that uses the intersecting roads. There would be some disruption during construction however this would be limited due to the nature and scale of the proposed work in this location. The option identified for this pinch point would achieve the proposal objectives as it would support the growing demand for access on this priority corridor, especially for northbound traffic wanting to enter the city from George Street into George Street and Pitt Street at this location. It and would improve road network functionality for this traffic in future years. The option also performed well against the evaluation criteria and provided the required outcome through one proposed option. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 45 Review of Environmental Factors
Table 2-7 Analysis of options in precinct 4: college C1: Wentworth Avenue (one option) Traffic efficiency The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies, reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to section 2.1). Amenity Kerbside use The most efficient method of achieving this would be to time-restrict and modify the parking and loading along the kerbside whilst altering the lane priorities at the key intersections to introduce capacity. This would therefore make efficient use of this wide major road corridor. The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to bypass the core city centre roads by setting both southbound and northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capacity in light of the planned closure of part of George Street and the reprioritisation of Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street. The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking and loading provisions during peak periods. It would therefore introduce benefit to road users whilst retaining the existing kerbside provisions at other times. Business impacts Summary There would be some minor parking losses within the corridor to achieve the promoted solution. Whilst the proposal would introduce loading time-restrictions it would still allow loading/unloading at certain times. The option identified for this pinch point would achieve the proposal objectives as it would support the growing demand for traffic wanting to enter or leave the city via this priority corridor. It and would improve road network functionality for this traffic in future years. The option also performed well against the evaluation criteria and provided the required outcome through one proposed option. C2: College Street (one option) Traffic efficiency The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies, reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to section 2.1) particularly in light of the pedestrianisation of George Street with local property access allowed. Amenity Kerbside use The most efficient method of achieving this would be to modify the performance of the key intersections along the road with limited changes to the kerbside uses to introduce capacity. The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to bypass the core city centre roads by setting both southbound and northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capacity in light of the planned pedestrianisation of George Street (with local property access allowed) and the reprioritisation of Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street. It would work in combination with the proposed removal of the cycleway, the amenity loss of which is being offset by the creation of the Castlereagh Street cycleway within the core of the city. The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking and loading provisions during peak periods. It would maintain the kerb extension south of Park Street that is needed to support pedestrians accessing the two key buildings; the Australia Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 46 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 11 and 12: Effect Temporary light spill impact
- Page 13 and 14: maintenance of traffic flows in the
- Page 15 and 16: What happens next? Following the su
- Page 17 and 18: 6.7 Water quality and hydrology ...
- Page 19 and 20: If approved, the proposal would tak
- Page 21 and 22: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 23 and 24: In doing so, the REF helps fulfil t
- Page 25 and 26: 2 Need and options considered This
- Page 27 and 28: NSW Long Term Transport Master Plan
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2 Existing road and public transp
- Page 31 and 32: Road Sussex Street between King Str
- Page 33 and 34: Road Precinct 4: college Wentworth
- Page 35 and 36: Bus stop hubs located at Circular Q
- Page 37 and 38: With these allocations set, Transpo
- Page 39 and 40: 2.4.2 Identified proposal options P
- Page 41 and 42: Precinct 2: retail Precinct 2: reta
- Page 43 and 44: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 45 and 46: Precinct 3: southern Precinct 3: so
- Page 47 and 48: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 49 and 50: Precinct 4: college Precinct 4: col
- Page 51 and 52: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 53 and 54: NW2: King Street (two options) Traf
- Page 55 and 56: Amenity All three options reallocat
- Page 57 and 58: Amenity At present, buses cannot re
- Page 59 and 60: Summary Table 2-6 ‘Option b’ an
- Page 61: Amenity Kerbside use Business impac
- Page 65 and 66: Amenity Kerbside use Business impac
- Page 67 and 68: 3 Description of the proposal The p
- Page 69 and 70: Work site reference Section Start a
- Page 71 and 72: Table 3-2 Typical traffic capacity
- Page 73 and 74: Typical improvement (with example)
- Page 75 and 76: Typical improvement (with example)
- Page 77 and 78: Typical improvement (with example)
- Page 79 and 80: Sussex Street to Kent Street Sussex
- Page 81 and 82: George Street to Pitt Street York S
- Page 83 and 84: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 85 and 86: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 87 and 88: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 89 and 90: Kent Street intersection Pitt Stree
- Page 91 and 92: Pitt Street to Castlereagh Street G
- Page 93 and 94: Margaret Street to Erskine Street J
- Page 95 and 96: Market Street intersection King Str
- Page 97 and 98: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 99 and 100: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 101 and 102: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 103 and 104: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 105 and 106: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 107 and 108: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 109 and 110: Liverpool Street to Eager Lane Jame
- Page 111 and 112: Hay Street to Rawson Place Goulburn
Table 2-7<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> options in precinct 4: college<br />
C1: Wentworth Avenue (one option)<br />
Traffic<br />
efficiency<br />
The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies,<br />
reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be<br />
promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to<br />
section 2.1).<br />
Amenity<br />
Kerbside<br />
use<br />
The most efficient method <strong>of</strong> achieving this would be to time-restrict and<br />
modify the parking and loading along the kerbside whilst altering the lane<br />
priorities at the key intersections to introduce capa<strong>city</strong>. This would<br />
therefore make efficient use <strong>of</strong> this wide major road corridor.<br />
The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to<br />
bypass the core <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> roads by setting both southbound and<br />
northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capa<strong>city</strong> in light <strong>of</strong><br />
the planned closure <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> George Street and the reprioritisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street.<br />
The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking<br />
and loading provisions during peak periods. It would therefore introduce<br />
benefit to road users whilst retaining the existing kerbside provisions at<br />
other times.<br />
Business<br />
impacts<br />
Summary<br />
There would be some minor parking losses within the corridor to achieve<br />
the promoted solution.<br />
Whilst the proposal would introduce loading time-restrictions it would still<br />
allow loading/unloading at certain times.<br />
The option identified for this pinch point would achieve the proposal<br />
objectives as it would support the growing demand for traffic wanting to<br />
enter or leave the <strong>city</strong> via this priority corridor. It and would improve road<br />
network functionality for this traffic in future years. The option also<br />
performed well against the evaluation criteria and provided the required<br />
outcome through one proposed option.<br />
C2: College Street (one option)<br />
Traffic<br />
efficiency<br />
The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies,<br />
reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be<br />
promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to<br />
section 2.1) particularly in light <strong>of</strong> the pedestrianisation <strong>of</strong> George Street<br />
with local property access allowed.<br />
Amenity<br />
Kerbside<br />
use<br />
The most efficient method <strong>of</strong> achieving this would be to modify the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the key intersections along the road with limited changes<br />
to the kerbside uses to introduce capa<strong>city</strong>.<br />
The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to<br />
bypass the core <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> roads by setting both southbound and<br />
northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capa<strong>city</strong> in light <strong>of</strong><br />
the planned pedestrianisation <strong>of</strong> George Street (with local property access<br />
allowed) and the reprioritisation <strong>of</strong> Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth<br />
Street. It would work in combination with the proposed removal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cycleway, the amenity loss <strong>of</strong> which is being <strong>of</strong>fset by the creation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Castlereagh Street cycleway within the core <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong>.<br />
The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking<br />
and loading provisions during peak periods.<br />
It would maintain the kerb extension south <strong>of</strong> Park Street that is needed to<br />
support pedestrians accessing the two key buildings; the Australia<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 46<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors