sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

24.11.2014 Views

Business impacts Summary S6: Pitt Street (one option) Traffic efficiency All options would be comparable in terms of their construction impacts; however it is possible that ‘option c’ would take less time to construct. It would therefore have less of an impact on existing bus services and travel times due to its potential shorter construction period. ‘Option c’ also benefits from its smaller construction footprint, which would cause less disruption to road users, bus users, pedestrians, adjacent businesses and buildings and the community. In summary, the purpose of improving Broadway and Wattle Street would be to reallocate traffic onto Wattle Street from Broadway in order to reduce traffic volumes on George Street so as to benefit road users. This would be best achieved by providing the most attractive diverge and merge arrangement between the two roads, which is achieved under ‘option a’. In this way, ‘option a’ would best meet the overall proposal objective of supporting growing demand for access to the city centre and improving road network functionality in future years. ‘Option a’ would also have more benefits for pedestrian amenity, capacity and kerbside use allocations than ‘option b’, and ‘option d’ and a potentially greater benefit than ‘option c’ in this regard. This is despite its potential longer construction program and wider construction footprint compared to ‘option c’. ‘Option a’ therefore performed best against the proposal objectives and evaluation criteria. The option would introduce traffic efficiencies, reduce congestion and improve traffic flows for this priority corridor for northbound traffic entering the city from George Street and Pitt Street at this location. Amenity Kerbside use Business impacts Summary This improvement would prioritise demand on the intersection during peak periods. The option would improve the road user experience for traffic by setting priorities at the intersection and improving traffic flows into George Street and Pitt Street from the south. The provided solution would result in no kerbside allocation changes. The reconfiguration of the intersection would not affect any loading zones, whilst it would benefit business traffic that uses the intersecting roads. There would be some disruption during construction however this would be limited due to the nature and scale of the proposed work in this location. The option identified for this pinch point would achieve the proposal objectives as it would support the growing demand for access on this priority corridor, especially for northbound traffic wanting to enter the city from George Street into George Street and Pitt Street at this location. It and would improve road network functionality for this traffic in future years. The option also performed well against the evaluation criteria and provided the required outcome through one proposed option. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 45 Review of Environmental Factors

Table 2-7 Analysis of options in precinct 4: college C1: Wentworth Avenue (one option) Traffic efficiency The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies, reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to section 2.1). Amenity Kerbside use The most efficient method of achieving this would be to time-restrict and modify the parking and loading along the kerbside whilst altering the lane priorities at the key intersections to introduce capacity. This would therefore make efficient use of this wide major road corridor. The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to bypass the core city centre roads by setting both southbound and northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capacity in light of the planned closure of part of George Street and the reprioritisation of Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street. The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking and loading provisions during peak periods. It would therefore introduce benefit to road users whilst retaining the existing kerbside provisions at other times. Business impacts Summary There would be some minor parking losses within the corridor to achieve the promoted solution. Whilst the proposal would introduce loading time-restrictions it would still allow loading/unloading at certain times. The option identified for this pinch point would achieve the proposal objectives as it would support the growing demand for traffic wanting to enter or leave the city via this priority corridor. It and would improve road network functionality for this traffic in future years. The option also performed well against the evaluation criteria and provided the required outcome through one proposed option. C2: College Street (one option) Traffic efficiency The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies, reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to section 2.1) particularly in light of the pedestrianisation of George Street with local property access allowed. Amenity Kerbside use The most efficient method of achieving this would be to modify the performance of the key intersections along the road with limited changes to the kerbside uses to introduce capacity. The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to bypass the core city centre roads by setting both southbound and northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capacity in light of the planned pedestrianisation of George Street (with local property access allowed) and the reprioritisation of Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street. It would work in combination with the proposed removal of the cycleway, the amenity loss of which is being offset by the creation of the Castlereagh Street cycleway within the core of the city. The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking and loading provisions during peak periods. It would maintain the kerb extension south of Park Street that is needed to support pedestrians accessing the two key buildings; the Australia Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 46 Review of Environmental Factors

Table 2-7<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> options in precinct 4: college<br />

C1: Wentworth Avenue (one option)<br />

Traffic<br />

efficiency<br />

The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies,<br />

reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be<br />

promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to<br />

section 2.1).<br />

Amenity<br />

Kerbside<br />

use<br />

The most efficient method <strong>of</strong> achieving this would be to time-restrict and<br />

modify the parking and loading along the kerbside whilst altering the lane<br />

priorities at the key intersections to introduce capa<strong>city</strong>. This would<br />

therefore make efficient use <strong>of</strong> this wide major road corridor.<br />

The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to<br />

bypass the core <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> roads by setting both southbound and<br />

northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capa<strong>city</strong> in light <strong>of</strong><br />

the planned closure <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> George Street and the reprioritisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street.<br />

The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking<br />

and loading provisions during peak periods. It would therefore introduce<br />

benefit to road users whilst retaining the existing kerbside provisions at<br />

other times.<br />

Business<br />

impacts<br />

Summary<br />

There would be some minor parking losses within the corridor to achieve<br />

the promoted solution.<br />

Whilst the proposal would introduce loading time-restrictions it would still<br />

allow loading/unloading at certain times.<br />

The option identified for this pinch point would achieve the proposal<br />

objectives as it would support the growing demand for traffic wanting to<br />

enter or leave the <strong>city</strong> via this priority corridor. It and would improve road<br />

network functionality for this traffic in future years. The option also<br />

performed well against the evaluation criteria and provided the required<br />

outcome through one proposed option.<br />

C2: College Street (one option)<br />

Traffic<br />

efficiency<br />

The option would benefit road users by introducing traffic efficiencies,<br />

reducing congestion and improving traffic flows allowing this road to be<br />

promoted as a priority bypass corridor as per the Access Strategy (refer to<br />

section 2.1) particularly in light <strong>of</strong> the pedestrianisation <strong>of</strong> George Street<br />

with local property access allowed.<br />

Amenity<br />

Kerbside<br />

use<br />

The most efficient method <strong>of</strong> achieving this would be to modify the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the key intersections along the road with limited changes<br />

to the kerbside uses to introduce capa<strong>city</strong>.<br />

The option would improve the road user experience for traffic wishing to<br />

bypass the core <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> roads by setting both southbound and<br />

northbound priorities. This would provide much needed capa<strong>city</strong> in light <strong>of</strong><br />

the planned pedestrianisation <strong>of</strong> George Street (with local property access<br />

allowed) and the reprioritisation <strong>of</strong> Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth<br />

Street. It would work in combination with the proposed removal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cycleway, the amenity loss <strong>of</strong> which is being <strong>of</strong>fset by the creation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Castlereagh Street cycleway within the core <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong>.<br />

The provided solution would modify and time-restrict the kerbside parking<br />

and loading provisions during peak periods.<br />

It would maintain the kerb extension south <strong>of</strong> Park Street that is needed to<br />

support pedestrians accessing the two key buildings; the Australia<br />

Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 46<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!