sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
Cumulative effect Pedestrian amenity and capacity due to footpath restrictions, including increased pedestrian journey times Key issues R2: Market Street R4: Clarence Street R5: York Street S3: Pitt Street C2: College Street. Potential cumulative impacts may include the restriction of access to the bus stops. Longer term or more extensive access restrictions to bus stops may potentially reduce accessibility and require users to walk to alternative locations, leading to increased journey times. The cumulative impact would ultimately depend on the timing and staging overlap between other projects and this proposal. Safeguards and management measures to avoid and/or minimise the proposal’s impacts on bus provisions and services are provided in Section 6.1.4. The construction staging and program would also be developed cognisant of the controls introduced under the above projects, with specific areas of conflict identified in the construction traffic management plan (refer to section 6.1.4). Conflict would be managed by: Scheduling work to avoid cumulative interactions with other projects Implementing traffic management controls to respect critical timing requirements of these other projects Monitoring of bus delays and bus stop restrictions during construction across the proposal footprint to consider cumulative effects from these other projects and modifying the construction management measures accordingly. Therefore, there will be a need to manage the interfaces of the construction staging and programming of this proposal in combination with the above projects to ensure impacts are minimised. The duration, type and extent of any footpath restriction would depend on the improvements being installed in any given location. It is assumed that potential restrictions could be in place for over three months in locations where more major work would be taking place (refer to Table 3-3 to Table 3-7). The restriction or delays would be relaxed during high demand (ie peak) periods so as not to impact on the city’s road network performance (refer to section 6.1.3). Footpaths and cycleways along the following roads may be impacted by simultaneous construction of the Sydney City Centre Bus Infrastructure and Sydney City Centre Cycleway projects and this proposal: NW1: Kent Street R1: Park Street Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 421 Review of Environmental Factors
Cumulative effect Key issues R2: Market Street R4: Clarence Street R5: York Street S2: Goulburn Street S4: Ultimo Road S5: Broadway S6: Pitt Street C1: Wentworth Avenue C2: College Street F1: Macquarie Street. The above restrictions may have a cumulative effect on pedestrians and cyclists leading to the following temporary impacts: Footpath congestion and reduced pedestrian capacity along the above roads Longer term footpath closures requiring pedestrians to divert to alternative routes, which may lead to longer travel delays and increased walking distances Longer term or more extensive pedestrian crossing restrictions that may reduce amenity and accessibility, and potentially require diversions Longer-term cycleway restrictions that may redirect greater and prolonged use of general traffic lanes, bus lanes or footpaths by cyclists. The cumulative impact would depend on the timing and staging overlap between the above projects and this proposal. Safeguards and management measures to avoid and/or minimise the proposal’s impacts on pedestrians and cyclists are provided in Section 6.1.4. The construction staging and program would also be developed cognisant of the controls introduced under the above projects, with specific areas of conflict identified in the construction traffic management plan (refer to section 6.1.4). Conflict would be managed by: Scheduling work to avoid cumulative interactions with other projects Implementing traffic management controls to respect critical timing requirements of these other projects Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 422 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 387 and 388: Flood risk The proposal footprint h
- Page 389 and 390: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 391 and 392: to contamination or the generation
- Page 393 and 394: Acid sulphate soils Acid sulphate s
- Page 395 and 396: Contaminated land (records) No site
- Page 397 and 398: Geology and soil impacts during ope
- Page 399 and 400: Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting
- Page 401 and 402: Table 6-56 Statutorily protected bi
- Page 403 and 404: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 405 and 406: 6.10.2 Potential impacts Waste gene
- Page 407 and 408: In addition, the contractor(s) woul
- Page 409 and 410: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 411 and 412: 6.11.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 413 and 414: Affected roads There are no screeni
- Page 415 and 416: Air quality sensitive receivers The
- Page 417 and 418: the roads covered by the proposal f
- Page 419 and 420: Greenhouse Gas Assessment Workbook
- Page 421 and 422: Climate change construction impacts
- Page 423 and 424: 6.14 Hazard and risk This section a
- Page 425 and 426: Hazard Potential consequence Key se
- Page 427 and 428: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 429 and 430: 6.15.2 Other committed and/or appro
- Page 431 and 432: Project Description Location and in
- Page 433 and 434: Project Description Location and in
- Page 435 and 436: Table 6-68 Potential cumulative imp
- Page 437: Cumulative effect Disruption to pub
- Page 441 and 442: Cumulative effect Key issues Street
- Page 443 and 444: Table 6-69 Potential cumulative eff
- Page 445 and 446: 6.15.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 447 and 448: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 449 and 450: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 451 and 452: 7 Environmental management This cha
- Page 453 and 454: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 455 and 456: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 457 and 458: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 459 and 460: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 461 and 462: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 463 and 464: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 465 and 466: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 467 and 468: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 469 and 470: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 471 and 472: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 473 and 474: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 475 and 476: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 477 and 478: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 479 and 480: 8 Conclusion This chapter provides
- Page 481 and 482: Object environment. 5(a)(ii) To enc
- Page 483 and 484: 8.3 Ecologically sustainable develo
- Page 485 and 486: 8.3.4 Improved valuation, pricing a
- Page 487 and 488: 9 Certification This review of envi
Cumulative effect<br />
Key issues<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
R2: Market Street<br />
R4: Clarence Street<br />
R5: York Street<br />
S2: Goulburn Street<br />
S4: Ultimo Road<br />
S5: Broadway<br />
S6: Pitt Street<br />
C1: Wentworth Avenue<br />
C2: College Street<br />
F1: Macquarie Street.<br />
The above restrictions may have a cumulative effect on pedestrians and cyclists leading to the following temporary<br />
impacts:<br />
Footpath congestion and reduced pedestrian capa<strong>city</strong> along the above roads<br />
Longer term footpath closures requiring pedestrians to divert to alternative routes, which may lead to longer travel<br />
delays and increased walking distances<br />
Longer term or more extensive pedestrian crossing restrictions that may reduce amenity and accessibility, and<br />
potentially require diversions<br />
Longer-term cycleway restrictions that may redirect greater and prolonged use <strong>of</strong> general traffic lanes, bus lanes or<br />
footpaths by cyclists.<br />
The cumulative impact would depend on the timing and staging overlap between the above projects and this proposal.<br />
Safeguards and management measures to avoid and/or minimise the proposal’s impacts on pedestrians and cyclists are<br />
provided in Section 6.1.4. The construction staging and program would also be developed cognisant <strong>of</strong> the controls<br />
introduced under the above projects, with specific areas <strong>of</strong> conflict identified in the construction traffic management plan<br />
(refer to section 6.1.4). Conflict would be managed by:<br />
<br />
<br />
Scheduling work to avoid cumulative interactions with other projects<br />
Implementing traffic management controls to respect critical timing requirements <strong>of</strong> these other projects<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 422<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors