sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
‘Option b’ would involve setting different traffic priorities during the morning and evening peak periods to allow bus traffic more opportunity to travel north and exit the city without delays along Clarence Street. Under this option the bus lane would remain adjacent to the western kerb and the kerbside allocations would be unaffected. R5: York Street (three options) York Street has been prioritised as a bus corridor in the Access Strategy. Three options emerged to improve bus operations between Barrack Street and Druitt Street and include: ‘Option a’ would involve lane reconfiguration works. By removing the kerb extension on the south-west corner of the York Street/King Street intersection it would be possible to create additional lane capacity for southbound buses heading into the city in the morning peak period. These works would be combined with proposed kerbside allocation restrictions to create additional morning peak period traffic lanes ‘Option b’ would involve the removal of the mid-block kerb extension and signals along York Street south of King Street to create a new traffic lane throughout this section of York Street up to Market Street. It would also see a reduction in the south-west kerb extension at the York Street/King Street intersection ‘Option c’ would be consistent with ‘option a’ except the extended kerb extensions at King Street would only be partially reduced to achieve the additional lane capacity. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 25 Review of Environmental Factors
Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 26 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 1 and 2: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 3 and 4: Executive summary The proposal Road
- Page 5 and 6: the proposed Sydney City Centre Cyc
- Page 7 and 8: The REF concludes that the proposal
- Page 9 and 10: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 11 and 12: Effect Temporary light spill impact
- Page 13 and 14: maintenance of traffic flows in the
- Page 15 and 16: What happens next? Following the su
- Page 17 and 18: 6.7 Water quality and hydrology ...
- Page 19 and 20: If approved, the proposal would tak
- Page 21 and 22: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 23 and 24: In doing so, the REF helps fulfil t
- Page 25 and 26: 2 Need and options considered This
- Page 27 and 28: NSW Long Term Transport Master Plan
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2 Existing road and public transp
- Page 31 and 32: Road Sussex Street between King Str
- Page 33 and 34: Road Precinct 4: college Wentworth
- Page 35 and 36: Bus stop hubs located at Circular Q
- Page 37 and 38: With these allocations set, Transpo
- Page 39 and 40: 2.4.2 Identified proposal options P
- Page 41: Precinct 2: retail Precinct 2: reta
- Page 45 and 46: Precinct 3: southern Precinct 3: so
- Page 47 and 48: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 49 and 50: Precinct 4: college Precinct 4: col
- Page 51 and 52: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 53 and 54: NW2: King Street (two options) Traf
- Page 55 and 56: Amenity All three options reallocat
- Page 57 and 58: Amenity At present, buses cannot re
- Page 59 and 60: Summary Table 2-6 ‘Option b’ an
- Page 61 and 62: Amenity Kerbside use Business impac
- Page 63 and 64: Table 2-7 Analysis of options in pr
- Page 65 and 66: Amenity Kerbside use Business impac
- Page 67 and 68: 3 Description of the proposal The p
- Page 69 and 70: Work site reference Section Start a
- Page 71 and 72: Table 3-2 Typical traffic capacity
- Page 73 and 74: Typical improvement (with example)
- Page 75 and 76: Typical improvement (with example)
- Page 77 and 78: Typical improvement (with example)
- Page 79 and 80: Sussex Street to Kent Street Sussex
- Page 81 and 82: George Street to Pitt Street York S
- Page 83 and 84: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 85 and 86: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 87 and 88: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 89 and 90: Kent Street intersection Pitt Stree
- Page 91 and 92: Pitt Street to Castlereagh Street G
‘Option b’ would involve setting different traffic priorities during the morning and<br />
evening peak periods to allow bus traffic more opportunity to travel north<br />
and exit the <strong>city</strong> without delays along Clarence Street. Under this option the<br />
bus lane would remain adjacent to the western kerb and the kerbside<br />
allocations would be unaffected.<br />
R5: York Street (three options)<br />
York Street has been prioritised as a bus corridor in the Access Strategy. Three<br />
options emerged to improve bus operations between Barrack Street and Druitt Street<br />
and include:<br />
‘Option a’ would involve lane reconfiguration works. By removing the kerb<br />
extension on the south-west corner <strong>of</strong> the York Street/King Street intersection it<br />
would be possible to create additional lane capa<strong>city</strong> for southbound buses<br />
heading into the <strong>city</strong> in the morning peak period. These works would be<br />
combined with proposed kerbside allocation restrictions to create additional<br />
morning peak period traffic lanes<br />
‘Option b’ would involve the removal <strong>of</strong> the mid-block kerb extension and<br />
signals along York Street south <strong>of</strong> King Street to create a new traffic lane<br />
throughout this section <strong>of</strong> York Street up to Market Street. It would also see a<br />
reduction in the south-west kerb extension at the York Street/King Street<br />
intersection<br />
‘Option c’ would be consistent with ‘option a’ except the extended kerb<br />
extensions at King Street would only be partially reduced to achieve the<br />
additional lane capa<strong>city</strong>.<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 25<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors