sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
standard-practice of sheeting and covering any trucks and using wheel brushes would minimise this impact. Whilst long-term dust exposure can lead to human health impacts, including asthma, such impacts from this proposal would be unlikely. More likely would be the potential for localised nuisance in the form of minor and temporary dust deposition on outside dining and seating areas, building frontages and parked cars. Equipment emissions Emissions-generating construction equipment (refer to section 3.3.5) may need to operate within restricted spaces within the city centre adjacent to building frontages for a number of consecutive days during construction. Whilst it would not impact on the air quality of the road corridor it may have an effect on immediately adjacent locations where ‘significant numbers of people congregate’ (eg ground-floor cafés, restaurants, hotel lobbies). This would be managed through the controls described below in Table 6-63. Emissions associated with construction traffic delays When traffic idles and queues, engine performance is compromised and fuel burns less efficiently, leading to an increase in traffic-generate air emissions. Section 6.1 discusses the consequential minor traffic delays that would occur across the proposal footprint caused as a result of implementing traffic management controls at each work site during construction. Whilst the construction program and staging would be used to ensure there would be no effect on the performance of the road network overall, there would be a temporary minor effect on air quality within the immediacy of the affected road corridor due to increased idling traffic. However, as ambient conditions are significantly below the Air NEPM air quality goals this impact would have no human health impact despite it potentially being perceptible. Air quality impacts during operation Appendix L shows the work sites where traffic flows would increase by more than 1,000 vehicles per day under the proposal. These changes would occur through the reallocation and reprioritisation of traffic within the city centre as a result of implementing the various projects under the Access Strategy. It would occur at various points within the following work sites: NW2: King Street R1: Park Street R2: Market Street R4: Clarence Street R5: York Street S2: Goulburn Street S3: Pitt Street C1: Wentworth Avenue C2: College Street F1: Macquarie Street. As the above screening criterion is triggered at ten of the 17 work sites there may be a perceptible minor reduction in air quality within the immediate road corridor in these locations. However, as described in the introduction to this section, there may conversely be a perceptible minor improvement in air quality in other locations due to the reduction in traffic on certain roads and its reallocation and reprioritisation onto Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 399 Review of Environmental Factors
the roads covered by the proposal footprint. Overall however, these changes would have a negligible impact to the city’s air quality which would remain unaffected by the proposal. 6.12.4 Safeguards and management measures Table 6-62 lists the air quality safeguards and management measures that would be implemented to address the impacts identified above in section 6.12.3. Table 6-62 Air quality safeguards and management measures Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Air quality emissions and dust propagation across the proposal footprint Air quality emissions and dust propagation across the proposal footprint An air quality management plan (AQMP) would form a sub-plan of the CEMP. As a minimum, the plan would: Map sensitive receiver locations Identify potential dust generating activities Provide for the monitoring the weather conditions Provide for the monitoring of dust generation on site Specify the inclusion of dust suppression control measures during high-wind events (see below) Specify the inclusion of emission control measures to reduce vehicle exhaust and machinery emissions, particularly in the context of ground-floor businesses adjacent to work sites. Specific management measures contained with the AQMP would include the following: Cover all waste transportation vehicles Stabilise temporary stockpiles Stabilise unsealed and exposed areas Minimise disturbance and the extent of exposed areas Progressively stabilise disturbed/exposed areas Implement additional dust control measures in exposed areas where the wind speed is excessive (including Construction contractor Construction contractor Construction Construction Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 400 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 365 and 366: Table 6-43 Temporary construction l
- Page 367 and 368: Work site Section Receiver F1: Macq
- Page 369 and 370: Landscape character and visual impa
- Page 371 and 372: The tree’s consistency and contri
- Page 373 and 374: Table 6-46 Tree pruning and removal
- Page 375 and 376: Turning restrictions and provisions
- Page 377 and 378: Work site Section Visual receiver R
- Page 379 and 380: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 381 and 382: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 383 and 384: Despite this, Sydney Harbour suppor
- Page 385 and 386: The proposal footprint is located a
- Page 387 and 388: Flood risk The proposal footprint h
- Page 389 and 390: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 391 and 392: to contamination or the generation
- Page 393 and 394: Acid sulphate soils Acid sulphate s
- Page 395 and 396: Contaminated land (records) No site
- Page 397 and 398: Geology and soil impacts during ope
- Page 399 and 400: Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting
- Page 401 and 402: Table 6-56 Statutorily protected bi
- Page 403 and 404: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 405 and 406: 6.10.2 Potential impacts Waste gene
- Page 407 and 408: In addition, the contractor(s) woul
- Page 409 and 410: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 411 and 412: 6.11.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 413 and 414: Affected roads There are no screeni
- Page 415: Air quality sensitive receivers The
- Page 419 and 420: Greenhouse Gas Assessment Workbook
- Page 421 and 422: Climate change construction impacts
- Page 423 and 424: 6.14 Hazard and risk This section a
- Page 425 and 426: Hazard Potential consequence Key se
- Page 427 and 428: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 429 and 430: 6.15.2 Other committed and/or appro
- Page 431 and 432: Project Description Location and in
- Page 433 and 434: Project Description Location and in
- Page 435 and 436: Table 6-68 Potential cumulative imp
- Page 437 and 438: Cumulative effect Disruption to pub
- Page 439 and 440: Cumulative effect Key issues
- Page 441 and 442: Cumulative effect Key issues Street
- Page 443 and 444: Table 6-69 Potential cumulative eff
- Page 445 and 446: 6.15.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 447 and 448: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 449 and 450: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 451 and 452: 7 Environmental management This cha
- Page 453 and 454: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 455 and 456: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 457 and 458: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 459 and 460: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 461 and 462: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 463 and 464: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 465 and 466: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
standard-practice <strong>of</strong> sheeting and covering any trucks and using wheel brushes<br />
would minimise this impact.<br />
Whilst long-term dust exposure can lead to human health impacts, including asthma,<br />
such impacts from this proposal would be unlikely. More likely would be the potential<br />
for localised nuisance in the form <strong>of</strong> minor and temporary dust deposition on outside<br />
dining and seating areas, building frontages and parked cars.<br />
Equipment emissions<br />
Emissions-generating construction equipment (refer to section 3.3.5) may need to<br />
operate within restricted spaces within the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> adjacent to building frontages<br />
for a number <strong>of</strong> consecutive days during construction. Whilst it would not impact on<br />
the air quality <strong>of</strong> the road corridor it may have an effect on immediately adjacent<br />
locations where ‘significant numbers <strong>of</strong> people congregate’ (eg ground-floor cafés,<br />
restaurants, hotel lobbies). This would be managed through the controls described<br />
below in Table 6-63.<br />
Emissions associated with construction traffic delays<br />
When traffic idles and queues, engine performance is compromised and fuel burns<br />
less efficiently, leading to an increase in traffic-generate air emissions.<br />
Section 6.1 discusses the consequential minor traffic delays that would occur across<br />
the proposal footprint caused as a result <strong>of</strong> implementing traffic management controls<br />
at each work site during construction. Whilst the construction program and staging<br />
would be used to ensure there would be no effect on the performance <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
network overall, there would be a temporary minor effect on air quality within the<br />
immediacy <strong>of</strong> the affected road corridor due to increased idling traffic. However, as<br />
ambient conditions are significantly below the Air NEPM air quality goals this impact<br />
would have no human health impact despite it potentially being perceptible.<br />
Air quality impacts during operation<br />
Appendix L shows the work sites where traffic flows would increase by more than<br />
1,000 vehicles per day under the proposal. These changes would occur through the<br />
reallocation and reprioritisation <strong>of</strong> traffic within the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
implementing the various projects under the Access Strategy. It would occur at<br />
various points within the following work sites:<br />
NW2: King Street<br />
R1: Park Street<br />
R2: Market Street<br />
R4: Clarence Street<br />
R5: York Street<br />
S2: Goulburn Street<br />
S3: Pitt Street<br />
C1: Wentworth Avenue<br />
C2: College Street<br />
F1: Macquarie Street.<br />
As the above screening criterion is triggered at ten <strong>of</strong> the 17 work sites there may be<br />
a perceptible minor reduction in air quality within the immediate road corridor in these<br />
locations. However, as described in the introduction to this section, there may<br />
conversely be a perceptible minor improvement in air quality in other locations due to<br />
the reduction in traffic on certain roads and its reallocation and reprioritisation onto<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 399<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors