sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

24.11.2014 Views

the United States Environment Protection Authority and UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). In the case of the proposal, it is clear that the ambient average conditions in the afternoon are sufficient to warrant dust control and suppression measures, notwithstanding the potential shielding/channelling effect provided by the urban environment that may lessen or worsen the conditions on site. Existing ambient air quality The existing ambient air quality of the proposal footprint is heavily influenced by road traffic emissions, principally comprising oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), oxides of sulphur (SO x ) and particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ). Other anthropogenic air pollutant sources include the industrial areas located in Botany Bay (to the south) and Homebush (to the west). The nearest locations where long-term ambient air quality is monitored are in Rozelle and Randwick. These sites are typical of the inner suburbs and representative of the city centre and therefore the study area. The long-term monitored air quality classification in these two locations is assessed as ‘good-to-very-good’ for approximately 60 per cent of the time and ‘fair’ for 30 per cent of the time. For the remaining 10 per cent of the time it is ‘poor’ due to high ozone levels (taken from the Classification of Air Quality, (EPA, 2013)). Table 6-61 shows the ambient air quality recorded for the key road traffic pollutants in the above two locations from 1 January 2013 until 1 January 2014 (EPA, 2014). Table 6-61 Ambient air quality of the key road traffic pollutants Pollutant 8-hour/one day averaging period National ambient air quality standards and goals (averaging period) Annual average mean concentration and (annual average maximum concentration) Carbon monoxide (CO) 9.0 ppm (8-hours) 0.27 (1.3) microgram per cubic metre (μgm -3 ) Particulate matter (PM 10 ) 50 μgm -3 (one day) 18.9–18.3 (55.3–58.5) μgm -3 Annual average Sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) 0.02 ppm 0.001 ppm Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) 0.03 ppm 0.007–0.011 ppm Ambient air quality within the city centre is likely to reflect the concentrations recorded in Rozelle and Randwick. The daily and annual average concentrations are several orders of magnitude below the Air NEPM goals with the exception of PM 10 . The Air NEPM PM 10 criterion was exceeded for three days between 1 January 2013 and 1 January 2014. Despite this, it can be concluded that the local ambient air quality in terms of the principal road traffic pollutant concentrations is favourable when compared to other major global cities around the world. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 397 Review of Environmental Factors

Air quality sensitive receivers There is a diversity of land uses within the study area (refer to section 6.5.2). They include (high-rise) residential buildings, public open spaces and other sensitive receiver types (eg educations facilities, health facilities and community support facilities). Also the high number of pedestrians within the city centre means that the whole study area should be considered sensitive to changes in air quality. 6.12.3 Potential impacts Air quality impacts during construction Dust dispersion There would be potential for dust dispersion due to the high erosion and mobilisation of the underlying soils (refer to section 6.8.2), combined with the prevailing local meteorological conditions and wind tunnelling effect along the city’s roads. Ground excavation work has the greatest risk and potential for generating dust. This would occur as a result of undertaking proposed utility adjustments, drainage modifications, road furniture relocation, and general signage, traffic signal and lighting pole relocations. Table 3-3 to Table 3-7 and Table 3-14 describe the location where these activities are planned to take place within the proposal footprint. Consequently, there is at least one location in each work site where there is the potential for dust to be generated. The associated impacts would depend on the duration of work in each location. The more major work locations (refer to the grey shaded cells in Table 3-3 to Table 3-7) would be typically in place for longer than three months. Despite this, any ground excavation work would be a small component of the construction activities taking place at a given work site. As such, dust from these activities would only be generated for a short period during the time the work site would be under construction. Dust would also be generated from a number of other activities (ie cutting, grinding, sawing) as: (Sections of) the road surface is ‘broken out’ (associated with all types of improvement described in Table 3-2) The footpaths, kerbs and intersections are adjusted (associated with the corresponding types of improvement described in Table 3-2) Other supporting work is undertake, the most notable of which would be regrading and resurfacing the road. Table 3-3 to Table 3-7 describes the locations where these activities would take place. The risk of dust mobilisation increases where excavations are exposed for long periods and materials are stockpiled. As there would be a requirement to close off each work site at the end of a shift and remove any material offsite to a construction compound or laydown area the potential for dust generation within the proposal footprint would be reduced. Stockpile management at the currently operational construction compounds/laydown areas (refer to section 3.5.1) would be managed in accordance with existing adopted practices to ensure dust propagation would be limited. Dust could also be generated along the haulage routes, however the Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 398 Review of Environmental Factors

the United States Environment Protection Authority and UK Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). In the case <strong>of</strong> the proposal, it is clear<br />

that the ambient average conditions in the afternoon are sufficient to warrant dust<br />

control and suppression measures, notwithstanding the potential<br />

shielding/channelling effect provided by the urban environment that may lessen or<br />

worsen the conditions on site.<br />

Existing ambient air quality<br />

The existing ambient air quality <strong>of</strong> the proposal footprint is heavily influenced by road<br />

traffic emissions, principally comprising oxides <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (NO x ), oxides <strong>of</strong> sulphur<br />

(SO x ) and particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ). Other anthropogenic air pollutant<br />

sources include the industrial areas located in Botany Bay (to the south) and<br />

Homebush (to the west).<br />

The nearest locations where long-term ambient air quality is monitored are in Rozelle<br />

and Randwick. These sites are typical <strong>of</strong> the inner suburbs and representative <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> and therefore the study area.<br />

The long-term monitored air quality classification in these two locations is assessed<br />

as ‘good-to-very-good’ for approximately 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> the time and ‘fair’ for 30 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the time. For the remaining 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the time it is ‘poor’ due to high<br />

ozone levels (taken from the Classification <strong>of</strong> Air Quality, (EPA, 2013)).<br />

Table 6-61 shows the ambient air quality recorded for the key road traffic pollutants in<br />

the above two locations from 1 January 2013 until 1 January 2014 (EPA, 2014).<br />

Table 6-61<br />

Ambient air quality <strong>of</strong> the key road traffic pollutants<br />

Pollutant<br />

8-hour/one day averaging period<br />

National ambient air<br />

quality standards and<br />

goals (averaging period)<br />

Annual average mean<br />

concentration and (annual<br />

average maximum<br />

concentration)<br />

Carbon monoxide (CO) 9.0 ppm (8-hours) 0.27 (1.3) microgram per cubic<br />

metre (μgm -3 )<br />

Particulate matter (PM 10 ) 50 μgm -3 (one day) 18.9–18.3 (55.3–58.5) μgm -3<br />

Annual average<br />

Sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) 0.02 ppm 0.001 ppm<br />

Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) 0.03 ppm 0.007–0.011 ppm<br />

Ambient air quality within the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> is likely to reflect the concentrations<br />

recorded in Rozelle and Randwick. The daily and annual average concentrations are<br />

several orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude below the Air NEPM goals with the exception <strong>of</strong> PM 10 .<br />

The Air NEPM PM 10 criterion was exceeded for three days between 1 January 2013<br />

and 1 January 2014. Despite this, it can be concluded that the local ambient air<br />

quality in terms <strong>of</strong> the principal road traffic pollutant concentrations is favourable<br />

when compared to other major global cities around the world.<br />

Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 397<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!