sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Waste and resource management during construction across the proposal Prepare a waste and resource management plan (WRMP) as a sub-plan of the CEMP. As a minimum describe the measures for handling, storing and classifying waste when ‘onsite’ and its subsequent disposal offsite to the relevant licenced facility. Construction contractor/ Maintenance contractor Construction/ operation Waste disposal during construction across the proposal Send all disposed materials to a suitably licenced waste management/landfill facility. Construction contractor Construction/ operation Waste handling and storage during construction across the proposal Store and segregate all waste at source (eg the construction compounds/laydown areas) in accordance with its classification. This includes recycled and reusable materials. Construction contractor Construction/ operation Littering and site tidiness during construction across the proposal footprint Monitor for waste accumulation, littering and general tidiness during routine site inspections. Construction contractor Construction Resource recovery during construction across the proposal Apply resource recovery principles: Reuse proposal-generated waste materials onsite (eg topsoil, recycled aggregate) providing it meets with exemption and classification requirements Construction contractor Construction/ operation Failing that, transfer the materials for use elsewhere on another site under a resource recovery exemption Employ waste segregation to allow paper, plastic, glass, metal and other material recycling. These materials could be either reused onsite or transferred to a recycling facility Consider composting general putrescible waste to allow recovery. Transfer these materials offsite to a composting facility. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 391 Review of Environmental Factors
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Reducing primary resource demand during construction across the proposal Use recycled and low embodied energy products to reduce primary resource demand in instances where the materials are cost and performance competitive (eg where quality control specifications allow). Construction contractor Construction/ operation 6.11 Aboriginal heritage This section assesses the proposal’s potential impact on Aboriginal heritage. 6.11.1 Method Study area The Aboriginal heritage assessment study area considered any remanet artefacts, sites or items within the five precincts shown on Figure 1-1, with a focus on the 17 work sites. The local pre-European settlement history was also used to describe the existing environment. Method and assessment criteria The Aboriginal assessment referred to the following legislation and guidance: National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 Due Diligence Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects in NSW, 2010 (OEH, 2010) Procedure for Aboriginal Heritage Consultation and Investigation (PACHCI) (Roads and Maritime, 2011) Standard Management Procedure, Unexpected Archaeological Finds (Roads and Maritime, 2012). The assessment adopted the four-stage method set out under the PACHCI. The focus of the assessment was to confirm the assumption that the proposal footprint and its environs have been heavily developed and disturbed sufficient to remove any reasonable potential for Aboriginal heritage values to remain. 6.11.2 Existing environment Prior to European settlement in 1788, the area surrounding Sydney Harbour was occupied by the Eora people. Today their occupation is evident through the discovery of middens, rock shelters and engravings along the coastline. The Eora were distributed into family and clan groups. The three main clans were the Gadigal, the Wanegal and the Cammeraygal. The Gadigal occupied the study area. Three Aboriginal sites were identified within the proposal footprint (identified through an extensive search of the Aboriginal heritage information management system (AHIMS) database in November 2014 (refer to Appendix K)). No Aboriginal heritage places were recorded. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 392 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 357 and 358: Tree characteristics The city centr
- Page 359 and 360: Table 6-41 Registered significant t
- Page 361 and 362: · Cafés, restaurants, hotels and
- Page 363 and 364: Location Receiver * Items marked wi
- Page 365 and 366: Table 6-43 Temporary construction l
- Page 367 and 368: Work site Section Receiver F1: Macq
- Page 369 and 370: Landscape character and visual impa
- Page 371 and 372: The tree’s consistency and contri
- Page 373 and 374: Table 6-46 Tree pruning and removal
- Page 375 and 376: Turning restrictions and provisions
- Page 377 and 378: Work site Section Visual receiver R
- Page 379 and 380: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 381 and 382: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 383 and 384: Despite this, Sydney Harbour suppor
- Page 385 and 386: The proposal footprint is located a
- Page 387 and 388: Flood risk The proposal footprint h
- Page 389 and 390: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 391 and 392: to contamination or the generation
- Page 393 and 394: Acid sulphate soils Acid sulphate s
- Page 395 and 396: Contaminated land (records) No site
- Page 397 and 398: Geology and soil impacts during ope
- Page 399 and 400: Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting
- Page 401 and 402: Table 6-56 Statutorily protected bi
- Page 403 and 404: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 405 and 406: 6.10.2 Potential impacts Waste gene
- Page 407: In addition, the contractor(s) woul
- Page 411 and 412: 6.11.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 413 and 414: Affected roads There are no screeni
- Page 415 and 416: Air quality sensitive receivers The
- Page 417 and 418: the roads covered by the proposal f
- Page 419 and 420: Greenhouse Gas Assessment Workbook
- Page 421 and 422: Climate change construction impacts
- Page 423 and 424: 6.14 Hazard and risk This section a
- Page 425 and 426: Hazard Potential consequence Key se
- Page 427 and 428: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 429 and 430: 6.15.2 Other committed and/or appro
- Page 431 and 432: Project Description Location and in
- Page 433 and 434: Project Description Location and in
- Page 435 and 436: Table 6-68 Potential cumulative imp
- Page 437 and 438: Cumulative effect Disruption to pub
- Page 439 and 440: Cumulative effect Key issues
- Page 441 and 442: Cumulative effect Key issues Street
- Page 443 and 444: Table 6-69 Potential cumulative eff
- Page 445 and 446: 6.15.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 447 and 448: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 449 and 450: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 451 and 452: 7 Environmental management This cha
- Page 453 and 454: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 455 and 456: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
- Page 457 and 458: No Impact Environmental safeguard R
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing<br />
Reducing primary<br />
resource demand<br />
during construction<br />
across the proposal<br />
Use recycled and low embodied<br />
energy products to reduce<br />
primary resource demand in<br />
instances where the materials<br />
are cost and performance<br />
competitive (eg where quality<br />
control specifications allow).<br />
Construction<br />
contractor<br />
Construction/<br />
operation<br />
6.11 Aboriginal heritage<br />
This section assesses the proposal’s potential impact on Aboriginal heritage.<br />
6.11.1 Method<br />
Study area<br />
The Aboriginal heritage assessment study area considered any remanet artefacts,<br />
sites or items within the five precincts shown on Figure 1-1, with a focus on the<br />
17 work sites. The local pre-European settlement history was also used to describe<br />
the existing environment.<br />
Method and assessment criteria<br />
The Aboriginal assessment referred to the following legislation and guidance:<br />
National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974<br />
Due Diligence Code <strong>of</strong> Practice for the Protection <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal Objects in<br />
NSW, 2010 (OEH, 2010)<br />
Procedure for Aboriginal Heritage Consultation and Investigation (PACHCI)<br />
(Roads and Maritime, 2011)<br />
Standard Management Procedure, Unexpected Archaeological Finds (Roads<br />
and Maritime, 2012).<br />
The assessment adopted the four-stage method set out under the PACHCI. The<br />
focus <strong>of</strong> the assessment was to confirm the assumption that the proposal footprint<br />
and its environs have been heavily developed and disturbed sufficient to remove any<br />
reasonable potential for Aboriginal heritage values to remain.<br />
6.11.2 Existing environment<br />
Prior to European settlement in 1788, the area surrounding Sydney Harbour was<br />
occupied by the Eora people. Today their occupation is evident through the discovery<br />
<strong>of</strong> middens, rock shelters and engravings along the coastline. The Eora were<br />
distributed into family and clan groups. The three main clans were the Gadigal, the<br />
Wanegal and the Cammeraygal. The Gadigal occupied the study area.<br />
Three Aboriginal sites were identified within the proposal footprint (identified through<br />
an extensive search <strong>of</strong> the Aboriginal heritage information management system<br />
(AHIMS) database in November 2014 (refer to Appendix K)). No Aboriginal heritage<br />
places were recorded.<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 392<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors