sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
disorientated immediately following the proposed tree pruning and removal. This would be most likely along Macquarie Street due to the removal of the two London Plane trees along the western kerb (work site: F1: Macquarie Street) (refer to section 6.6.3). This could cause a break in established flight lines between Hyde Park and the Domain/Botanic Garden. However, bat species are generally adaptive and find alternative routes. This would be assisted by the widespread presence of alternative structures to echolocate off. As such, the impact is assessed as negligible. There is the potential to injure or kill fauna when removing/pruning the trees. There is also a remote potential for larger nocturnal ground-dwelling species to fall into open excavation trenches. However both impacts are considered unlikely given the limited habitat potential of the proposal footprint and, in the case of species entrapment, the potential for such an impact to occur would be remote. Statutorily protected biodiversity As noted above, whilst the grey-headed flying fox may intermittently shelter or forage over the proposal footprint it is improbable that it depends on any of the affected trees for its survival. Consequently, as the proposal is unlikely to have a significant effect on this species and no assessment of significance under the TSC Act Assessment Guidelines (refer to section 6.9.1) is required. There are no anticipated impacts on species listed under either FM Act or EPBC Act due to the limited biodiversity values of the proposal footprint. Biodiversity impacts during operation Despite introducing traffic improvements in certain locations around the city centre the proposal would not impact on land with associated biodiversity values. Consequently, there would be no operational impacts. 6.9.4 Safeguards and management measures Table 6-57 lists the biodiversity safeguards and management measures that would be implemented to address the impacts identified above in section 6.9.3. Table 6-57 Biodiversity safeguards and management measures Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Biodiversity management across the entire proposal footprint Prepare a biodiversity management plan (BMP) as a sub-plan of the CEMP. As a minimum, the plan would: Provide for the discovery of unexpected threatened flora or fauna. The provisions of Standard Management Procedure: Unexpected Threatened Species Finds (Roads and Maritime, 2011) would be subsequently implemented. Construction contractor Preconstruction Construction Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 385 Review of Environmental Factors
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Impacts on non-listed species across the entire proposal footprint Impacts on non-listed species across the entire proposal footprint Impacts on non-listed species across the entire proposal footprint Prepare a detailed arboricultural survey (refer to section 6.6.4) to identify mature and hollowbearing trees that may be impacted by the proposal Implement measures to avoid or reduce impacts on these trees in line with those described above. As a precautionary measure ensure a qualified ecologist would be present during the felling/pruning of any identified hollow-bearing trees to manage wildlife that may be disturbed and/or injured. The ecologist would assess the species and then release them to the nearest suitable habitat if uninjured. As a precautionary measure close-off all excavations overnight, in locations where night works are not planned, to prevent animals becoming trapped Inspect each excavation prior to the works starting in the morning Have a designated qualified person would capture any inadvertently trapped species and release the species into the nearest suitable habitat if uninjured. Roads and Maritime Construction contractor Construction contractor Preconstruction Construction Construction 6.10 Waste management and resource use This section assesses the proposal’s potential waste management and resource use impacts. 6.10.1 Method Study area The study area considered the generation of waste across the proposal footprint, its temporary storage in one of the proposed construction compound/laydown areas (refer to section 3.4.2) and its disposal offsite. It also considered the availability and ability to obtain construction materials locally. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 386 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 351 and 352: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 353 and 354: 6.6.2 Existing environment Landscap
- Page 355 and 356: Landscape character zone Overview d
- Page 357 and 358: Tree characteristics The city centr
- Page 359 and 360: Table 6-41 Registered significant t
- Page 361 and 362: · Cafés, restaurants, hotels and
- Page 363 and 364: Location Receiver * Items marked wi
- Page 365 and 366: Table 6-43 Temporary construction l
- Page 367 and 368: Work site Section Receiver F1: Macq
- Page 369 and 370: Landscape character and visual impa
- Page 371 and 372: The tree’s consistency and contri
- Page 373 and 374: Table 6-46 Tree pruning and removal
- Page 375 and 376: Turning restrictions and provisions
- Page 377 and 378: Work site Section Visual receiver R
- Page 379 and 380: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 381 and 382: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 383 and 384: Despite this, Sydney Harbour suppor
- Page 385 and 386: The proposal footprint is located a
- Page 387 and 388: Flood risk The proposal footprint h
- Page 389 and 390: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 391 and 392: to contamination or the generation
- Page 393 and 394: Acid sulphate soils Acid sulphate s
- Page 395 and 396: Contaminated land (records) No site
- Page 397 and 398: Geology and soil impacts during ope
- Page 399 and 400: Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting
- Page 401: Table 6-56 Statutorily protected bi
- Page 405 and 406: 6.10.2 Potential impacts Waste gene
- Page 407 and 408: In addition, the contractor(s) woul
- Page 409 and 410: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 411 and 412: 6.11.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 413 and 414: Affected roads There are no screeni
- Page 415 and 416: Air quality sensitive receivers The
- Page 417 and 418: the roads covered by the proposal f
- Page 419 and 420: Greenhouse Gas Assessment Workbook
- Page 421 and 422: Climate change construction impacts
- Page 423 and 424: 6.14 Hazard and risk This section a
- Page 425 and 426: Hazard Potential consequence Key se
- Page 427 and 428: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 429 and 430: 6.15.2 Other committed and/or appro
- Page 431 and 432: Project Description Location and in
- Page 433 and 434: Project Description Location and in
- Page 435 and 436: Table 6-68 Potential cumulative imp
- Page 437 and 438: Cumulative effect Disruption to pub
- Page 439 and 440: Cumulative effect Key issues
- Page 441 and 442: Cumulative effect Key issues Street
- Page 443 and 444: Table 6-69 Potential cumulative eff
- Page 445 and 446: 6.15.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 447 and 448: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 449 and 450: Effect Affected factors/receivers L
- Page 451 and 452: 7 Environmental management This cha
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing<br />
Impacts on<br />
non-listed<br />
species across<br />
the entire<br />
proposal<br />
footprint<br />
Impacts on<br />
non-listed<br />
species across<br />
the entire<br />
proposal<br />
footprint<br />
Impacts on<br />
non-listed<br />
species across<br />
the entire<br />
proposal<br />
footprint<br />
<br />
<br />
Prepare a detailed arboricultural<br />
survey (refer to section 6.6.4) to<br />
identify mature and hollowbearing<br />
trees that may be<br />
impacted by the proposal<br />
Implement measures to avoid or<br />
reduce impacts on these trees<br />
in line with those described<br />
above.<br />
As a precautionary measure<br />
ensure a qualified ecologist<br />
would be present during the<br />
felling/pruning <strong>of</strong> any identified<br />
hollow-bearing trees to manage<br />
wildlife that may be disturbed<br />
and/or injured.<br />
The ecologist would assess the<br />
species and then release them to<br />
the nearest suitable habitat if<br />
uninjured.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
As a precautionary measure<br />
close-<strong>of</strong>f all excavations<br />
overnight, in locations where<br />
night works are not planned, to<br />
prevent animals becoming<br />
trapped<br />
Inspect each excavation prior to<br />
the works starting in the<br />
morning<br />
Have a designated qualified<br />
person would capture any<br />
inadvertently trapped species<br />
and release the species into the<br />
nearest suitable habitat if<br />
uninjured.<br />
Roads and<br />
Maritime<br />
Construction<br />
contractor<br />
Construction<br />
contractor<br />
Preconstruction<br />
Construction<br />
Construction<br />
6.10 Waste management and resource use<br />
This section assesses the proposal’s potential waste management and resource use<br />
impacts.<br />
6.10.1 Method<br />
Study area<br />
The study area considered the generation <strong>of</strong> waste across the proposal footprint, its<br />
temporary storage in one <strong>of</strong> the proposed construction compound/laydown areas<br />
(refer to section 3.4.2) and its disposal <strong>of</strong>fsite. It also considered the availability and<br />
ability to obtain construction materials locally.<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 386<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors