sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
Table 6-49 Work sites Flood catchment characteristics and flood risk Flood catchment characteristics City area NW2: King Street R2: Market Street R5: York Street F1: Macquarie Street F2: Macquarie Street Darling Harbour S3: Pitt Street S4: Ultimo Road C1: Wentworth Avenue The catchment covers parts of the city centre, Millers Point and Barangaroo. The majority of the catchment drains to Sydney Cove via Sydney Water’s main trunk drainage system. This includes road drainage. There are no open-channel reaches in the catchment and water infiltration is limited due to the extensive impervious surfaces. The catchment has flooded six times since 1949. The draft catchment flood study (BMT WBM Pty Ltd, 2014a) predicted flooding across a range of scenarios including the probable maximum flood (PMF) event (eg worst case flood risks) in the following areas within the construction footprint: Along the length of King Street (work site NW2) to a depth of over one metre between George Street and Pitt Street Along the length of Market Street (work site R2) to a depth of 0.5 metres Along a small section of York Street (work site R5) to a depth of 0.1 metres Along sections of Macquarie Street (work sites F1 and F2) to a depth of 0.1 metres The study also provisionally reports that there would be a minimum of 25 minutes following an extreme rainfall event before some of the city streets would start to flood. The catchment covers Haymarket, Ultimo and parts of the city centre. The catchment drains broadly south to north via Sydney Water’s main trunk drainage system. The following relevant flood risks are noted in the draft flood study (BMT WBM Pty Ltd, 2014b): The corner of Goulburn Street and Wentworth Avenue (work site C1) which was subsequently modelled and shown to flood to 0.3 metres under a PMF worst case event The corner of Ultimo Road and Harris Street (work site S4) which was subsequently modelled and shown to flood to 0.6 metres under a PMF worst case event The ability for Pitt Street at Liverpool Street (work site S3) was shown to flood under a PMF worst case event. With this knowledge, City of Sydney is currently in the process of developing a flood risk management strategy for the catchment based on the predicted flood levels. Groundwater Sydney’s groundwater is classified into three principal aquifer units: the Botany Bay sand beds; the metropolitan coastal sand (coastal sands); and the Sydney basincentral (porous) rock beds. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 367 Review of Environmental Factors
The proposal footprint is located above the Sydney basin-central area porous rock aquifer unit. This is the most extensive of Sydney’s aquifer units; however its associated groundwater quality is ‘poor-to-very-poor’ (State of the Catchment, Groundwater the Sydney Metropolitan Region 2010, DECCW). The proposal footprint is not located on land designated for groundwater management or underlain by a vulnerable aquifer. It is also located outside of the heavily contaminated Botany Bay sand beds. The available published information on localised groundwater depth is limited to a few bore records around Barangaroo and the periphery of the city centre. These records confirm the presence of a water bearing zone at shallow depths of between one and six metres. The wider literature also confirms that groundwater depths can vary from just below the surface to approximately 10 metres 4 . Coastal inundation also occurs east of the proposal footprint, often requiring dewatering during construction. In conclusion, the geology and soil characteristics of the proposal footprint (refer to section 6.8.2) are capable of bearing groundwater. They are also capable of being hydraulically connected allowing groundwater to transfer between the geological horizons and the upper soil layers (referred to as an unconfined groundwater). That said, certain of the soils are characteristically impervious or semi-pervious (refer to section 6.8.2) and would not readily support groundwater flow. They may however support locally perched waters at or close to the surface or limited flows across their extents. Closer to Sydney Harbour there is likely to be an interface between the groundwater and coastal waters. As a result, the groundwater is likely to be slightly brackish as a result of saline intrusion. The extent of saline intrusion and brackish concentrations will depend on the localised groundwater pressure and chemistry along with the geology of the area. 6.7.3 Potential impacts Water quality and hydrology impacts during construction Accidental spillage Some of the proposed construction works detailed in section 3.3 would have a limited risk of resulting in accidental chemical, oil and fuel spillages during construction. This risk would exist: At any work site as a result of general working activities Along haulage routes through accidents or poorly maintained vehicles At the construction compounds/laydown areas as a result of poor materials handling, poor materials storage or poor equipment maintenance practices. The corresponding activities within the proposal footprint that would be at greater risk of accidental spillage include: Removing spoil and waste from site to one of the construction compounds or temporary laydown areas (ie haulage) Delivering materials to site or one of the construction compounds or temporary laydown areas (ie haulage) Loading and unloading at the work sites and construction compounds or laydown areas Major ground excavation work, including drainage modifications and utility adjustments. 4 Russell. G, Green. R, Rumpf. C, Managing Groundwater Impacts of Construction in Sydney NSW, 2010. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 368 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 333 and 334: Work site C: Wattle Street intersec
- Page 335 and 336: Work site D: Wemyss Lane to Goulbur
- Page 337 and 338: Work site F: Park Street to Oxford
- Page 339 and 340: Method and assessment criteria The
- Page 341 and 342: General land use character General
- Page 343 and 344: Development precinct Precinct 1: re
- Page 345 and 346: Property Roadside property Table 6-
- Page 347 and 348: Future land uses and development pr
- Page 349 and 350: Rubbish bins Water fountains City m
- Page 351 and 352: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 353 and 354: 6.6.2 Existing environment Landscap
- Page 355 and 356: Landscape character zone Overview d
- Page 357 and 358: Tree characteristics The city centr
- Page 359 and 360: Table 6-41 Registered significant t
- Page 361 and 362: · Cafés, restaurants, hotels and
- Page 363 and 364: Location Receiver * Items marked wi
- Page 365 and 366: Table 6-43 Temporary construction l
- Page 367 and 368: Work site Section Receiver F1: Macq
- Page 369 and 370: Landscape character and visual impa
- Page 371 and 372: The tree’s consistency and contri
- Page 373 and 374: Table 6-46 Tree pruning and removal
- Page 375 and 376: Turning restrictions and provisions
- Page 377 and 378: Work site Section Visual receiver R
- Page 379 and 380: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 381 and 382: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 383: Despite this, Sydney Harbour suppor
- Page 387 and 388: Flood risk The proposal footprint h
- Page 389 and 390: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 391 and 392: to contamination or the generation
- Page 393 and 394: Acid sulphate soils Acid sulphate s
- Page 395 and 396: Contaminated land (records) No site
- Page 397 and 398: Geology and soil impacts during ope
- Page 399 and 400: Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting
- Page 401 and 402: Table 6-56 Statutorily protected bi
- Page 403 and 404: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 405 and 406: 6.10.2 Potential impacts Waste gene
- Page 407 and 408: In addition, the contractor(s) woul
- Page 409 and 410: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 411 and 412: 6.11.4 Safeguards and management me
- Page 413 and 414: Affected roads There are no screeni
- Page 415 and 416: Air quality sensitive receivers The
- Page 417 and 418: the roads covered by the proposal f
- Page 419 and 420: Greenhouse Gas Assessment Workbook
- Page 421 and 422: Climate change construction impacts
- Page 423 and 424: 6.14 Hazard and risk This section a
- Page 425 and 426: Hazard Potential consequence Key se
- Page 427 and 428: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 429 and 430: 6.15.2 Other committed and/or appro
- Page 431 and 432: Project Description Location and in
- Page 433 and 434: Project Description Location and in
Table 6-49<br />
Work sites<br />
Flood catchment characteristics and flood risk<br />
Flood catchment characteristics<br />
City area<br />
NW2: King Street<br />
R2: Market Street<br />
R5: York Street<br />
F1: Macquarie Street<br />
F2: Macquarie Street<br />
Darling Harbour<br />
S3: Pitt Street<br />
S4: Ultimo Road<br />
C1: Wentworth<br />
Avenue<br />
The catchment covers parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong>, Millers Point and<br />
Barangaroo. The majority <strong>of</strong> the catchment drains to Sydney<br />
Cove via Sydney Water’s main trunk drainage system. This<br />
includes road drainage. There are no open-channel reaches in<br />
the catchment and water infiltration is limited due to the<br />
extensive impervious surfaces. The catchment has flooded six<br />
times since 1949.<br />
The draft catchment flood study (BMT WBM Pty Ltd, 2014a)<br />
predicted flooding across a range <strong>of</strong> scenarios including the<br />
probable maximum flood (PMF) event (eg worst case flood<br />
risks) in the following areas within the construction footprint:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Along the length <strong>of</strong> King Street (work site NW2) to a depth<br />
<strong>of</strong> over one metre between George Street and Pitt Street<br />
Along the length <strong>of</strong> Market Street (work site R2) to a depth<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.5 metres<br />
Along a small section <strong>of</strong> York Street (work site R5) to a<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> 0.1 metres<br />
Along sections <strong>of</strong> Macquarie Street (work sites F1 and F2)<br />
to a depth <strong>of</strong> 0.1 metres<br />
The study also provisionally reports that there would be a<br />
minimum <strong>of</strong> 25 minutes following an extreme rainfall event<br />
before some <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong> streets would start to flood.<br />
The catchment covers Haymarket, Ultimo and parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong><br />
<strong>centre</strong>. The catchment drains broadly south to north via Sydney<br />
Water’s main trunk drainage system. The following relevant<br />
flood risks are noted in the draft flood study (BMT WBM Pty<br />
Ltd, 2014b):<br />
<br />
The corner <strong>of</strong> Goulburn Street and Wentworth Avenue<br />
(work site C1) which was subsequently modelled and<br />
shown to flood to 0.3 metres under a PMF worst case<br />
event<br />
The corner <strong>of</strong> Ultimo Road and Harris Street (work site S4)<br />
which was subsequently modelled and shown to flood to<br />
0.6 metres under a PMF worst case event<br />
The ability for Pitt Street at Liverpool Street (work site S3)<br />
was shown to flood under a PMF worst case event.<br />
With this knowledge, City <strong>of</strong> Sydney is currently in the process <strong>of</strong> developing a flood<br />
risk management strategy for the catchment based on the predicted flood levels.<br />
Groundwater<br />
Sydney’s groundwater is classified into three principal aquifer units: the Botany Bay<br />
sand beds; the metropolitan coastal sand (coastal sands); and the Sydney basincentral<br />
(porous) rock beds.<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 367<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors