24.11.2014 Views

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With these allocations set, Transport for NSW developed a multimodal traffic model<br />

to consider and identify how the <strong>city</strong>’s roads would be impacted due to the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> Access Strategy over the coming years. The model also<br />

considered the demand introduced from other major developments such as<br />

Barangaroo, the Alfred, Pitt, Dalley and George Street (APDG) development and the<br />

Sydney International Convention, Exhibition and Entertainment Centre Precinct<br />

(SICEEP) (refer to Table 6-33).<br />

The model outputs identified the congestion pinch points across the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong>.<br />

These represented the locations where the road network would not cope with existing<br />

or future traffic volumes regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the key Access Strategy projects<br />

progress or not.<br />

The list was long as many <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong>’s streets were shown to either currently operate<br />

at or above capa<strong>city</strong>. Consequently, the focus was on identifying the key locations<br />

where the improvements would most benefit the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> over the coming years in<br />

light <strong>of</strong> the planned changes introduced by the Access Strategy. Consequently<br />

Roads and Maritime in collaboration with Transport for NSW identified that:<br />

Improvements along certain streets are a priority to enable delivery <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

Access Strategy projects<br />

Certain streets are at a critical point in the road network (ie they are heavily<br />

congested during the peak periods and would result in grid lock if they were not<br />

improved under this proposal); this is compared to other streets that are near<br />

capa<strong>city</strong> but would still function in the future once the Access Strategy projects<br />

were implemented<br />

Certain streets would indirectly benefit from improvements along other streets,<br />

but it is sufficient not to improve their capa<strong>city</strong> at this point in time.<br />

As a result the 17 pinch points in Table 2-2 were identified for improvement under<br />

this proposal.<br />

Table 2-2<br />

Key pinch points<br />

Key pinch point Reason for its selection (see further explanation in Table 2-1)<br />

Precinct 1: north-west<br />

NW1: Kent Street<br />

Due to its multi-modal function parallel to the central spine<br />

NW2: King Street<br />

Precinct 2: retail<br />

R1: Park Street<br />

Due to its multi-modal function across the central spine<br />

As it is a congestion pinch point and due to its function for bus<br />

priority in the <strong>city</strong><br />

R2: Market Street Due to its multi-modal function across the central spine<br />

R3: Sussex Street Due to its bypass function to the north, south and west<br />

R4: Clarence Street Due to its function for bus priority out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong><br />

R5: York Street Due to its function for bus priority into the <strong>city</strong><br />

Precinct 3: southern<br />

S1: Sussex Street Due to its bypass function to the north, south and west<br />

S2: Goulburn Street As it is a congestion pinch point<br />

Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 20<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!