sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Potential for construction vibration causing structural damage and human discomfort at all work sites except F1 and F2 Potential noise and vibration nuisance and amenity impacts during construction. Affects the entire proposal footprint Undertake a location-specific vibration assessment prior to construction where there is the planned use of a vibratory roller. The survey should assess all receivers within the distance limits specified in Table 6-15 depending on the size of vibratory roller that would be used on site. Undertake the following actions in locations where there is the potential for vibration impacts: Building condition surveys for any locations identified to be within the safe working distance both before and after the works to identify existing damage and any damage due to the works Vibration monitoring during vibration intensive works In the case that exceedances are detected, review the situation and identify means to minimise impacts to residents and the appropriate changes made and the CNVMP updated accordingly. Restrict the use of any vibratory rollers above four tonnes. If this is not feasible implement respite periods to manage human comfort impacts. Provide a 24-hour community hotline for complaints and queries concerning construction and advertise this ahead of starting any work. Develop a complaints handling procedure. Inform the community in advance of commencing any planned works, through advertisement, flyers and community consultation sessions. Construction contractors Construction contractor Preconstruction Preconstruction Make the construction program available to the community and ensure it is routinely updated as works progress. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 229 Review of Environmental Factors
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing Note: the above actions would be undertaken as part of the consultation strategy described in section 5.6. 6.3 Non-Aboriginal heritage Appendix E contains a non-Aboriginal heritage specialist study prepared by GML Heritage to support the REF. A summary is provided below. 6.3.1 Method Study area The non-Aboriginal heritage assessment considered the proposal’s impact on all heritage-listed items and potential subsurface archaeology within the five precincts shown on Figure 1-1. It focussed on those items that are located adjacent to the 17 work sites. The European settlement history of the locality was used to describe the existing environment. Method and assessment criteria The non-Aboriginal heritage assessment was undertaken in accordance with: Heritage Act 1977 NSW Heritage Manual (Heritage Office and Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, 1996) Assessing Heritage Significance (Heritage Office, 2001) Statements of Heritage Impact (Heritage Office and Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, 2002). The assessment: Identified the existing non-Aboriginal heritage characteristics of the study area by referring to the: - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage List - National heritage list - Commonwealth heritage list - State heritage register - Schedule 5 of the City of Sydney LEP - State heritage inventory - Section 170 heritage and conservation registers - Non-statutory lists including the National Trust register - Australian Institute of Architects register of significant architecture - Register of the National Estate (a non-statutory database) - Existing heritage assessments, conservation plans and related guidance material - Historical maps, plans and aerial photographs Confirmed the study area’s heritage characteristics in relation to the proposal footprint by undertaking a site inspection Assessed the study area’s heritage value and significance by: - Reviewing existing statements of significance (where available) - Determining the potential survival and significance of archaeological deposits with the study area Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 230 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 195 and 196: Section G: York Street intersection
- Page 197 and 198: Section Precinct 4: college C1: Wen
- Page 199 and 200: Location and type of work (refer to
- Page 201 and 202: with the proposed changes under the
- Page 203 and 204: Loading zones Mobility parking spac
- Page 205 and 206: Table 6-8 describes the temporary o
- Page 207 and 208: Location J: George Street to Pitt S
- Page 209 and 210: Location H: Hay Street to Rawson Pl
- Page 211 and 212: As can be seen from Table 6-8, ther
- Page 213 and 214: Table 6-9 Altered footpaths and ped
- Page 215 and 216: Section D: Abercrombie Street inter
- Page 217 and 218: Loading zones Mobility parking spac
- Page 219 and 220: Table F-2 in Appendix F provides fu
- Page 221 and 222: Level of Service (LoS) Maximum queu
- Page 223 and 224: The above table demonstrates the va
- Page 225 and 226: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 227 and 228: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 229 and 230: Table 6-13 Construction noise manag
- Page 231 and 232: The applicable human comfort vibrat
- Page 233 and 234: where the corresponding noise impac
- Page 235 and 236: The modelling predicted the constru
- Page 237 and 238: Work site Receiver type NML for the
- Page 239 and 240: Work site Receiver type NML for the
- Page 241 and 242: The highest predicted noise impacts
- Page 243 and 244: Work site Precinct 3: southern Pred
- Page 245: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 249 and 250: Post World War II, Sydney enhanced
- Page 251 and 252: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 253 and 254: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 255 and 256: Table 6-21 Heritage listed items It
- Page 257 and 258: Item name Section Location Signific
- Page 259 and 260: Item name Section Location Signific
- Page 261 and 262: Item name Area of archaeology poten
- Page 263 and 264: Item name 21 Former value and item
- Page 265 and 266: Item name Works with potential heri
- Page 267 and 268: Item name R2 Market Street Works wi
- Page 269 and 270: Item name 3 Pinnacle House 5 Commer
- Page 271 and 272: Item name Precinct 3: southern S3:
- Page 273 and 274: Item name Works with potential heri
- Page 275 and 276: Item name Works with potential heri
- Page 277 and 278: Item name F2: Macquarie Street Work
- Page 279 and 280: Lighting pole relocation General si
- Page 281 and 282: Reference Potential archaeological
- Page 283 and 284: Reference Potential archaeological
- Page 285 and 286: Reference Potential archaeological
- Page 287 and 288: The above summary reflects that the
- Page 289 and 290: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
- Page 291 and 292: 6.4.2 Existing environment Populati
- Page 293 and 294: Social infrastructure Cultural and
- Page 295 and 296: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing<br />
Note: the above actions would be<br />
undertaken as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
consultation strategy described in<br />
section 5.6.<br />
6.3 Non-Aboriginal heritage<br />
Appendix E contains a non-Aboriginal heritage specialist study prepared by GML<br />
Heritage to support the REF. A summary is provided below.<br />
6.3.1 Method<br />
Study area<br />
The non-Aboriginal heritage assessment considered the proposal’s impact on all<br />
heritage-listed items and potential subsurface archaeology within the five precincts<br />
shown on Figure 1-1. It focussed on those items that are located adjacent to the<br />
17 work sites. The European settlement history <strong>of</strong> the locality was used to describe<br />
the existing environment.<br />
Method and assessment criteria<br />
The non-Aboriginal heritage assessment was undertaken in accordance with:<br />
Heritage Act 1977<br />
NSW Heritage Manual (Heritage Office and Department <strong>of</strong> Urban Affairs and<br />
Planning, 1996)<br />
Assessing Heritage Significance (Heritage Office, 2001)<br />
Statements <strong>of</strong> Heritage Impact (Heritage Office and Department <strong>of</strong> Urban<br />
Affairs and Planning, 2002).<br />
The assessment:<br />
Identified the existing non-Aboriginal heritage characteristics <strong>of</strong> the study area<br />
by referring to the:<br />
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization<br />
(UNESCO) World Heritage List<br />
- National heritage list<br />
- Commonwealth heritage list<br />
- State heritage register<br />
- Schedule 5 <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Sydney LEP<br />
- State heritage inventory<br />
- Section 170 heritage and conservation registers<br />
- Non-statutory lists including the National Trust register<br />
- Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Architects register <strong>of</strong> significant architecture<br />
- Register <strong>of</strong> the National Estate (a non-statutory database)<br />
- Existing heritage assessments, conservation plans and related guidance<br />
material<br />
- Historical maps, plans and aerial photographs<br />
Confirmed the study area’s heritage characteristics in relation to the proposal<br />
footprint by undertaking a site inspection<br />
Assessed the study area’s heritage value and significance by:<br />
- Reviewing existing statements <strong>of</strong> significance (where available)<br />
- Determining the potential survival and significance <strong>of</strong> archaeological<br />
deposits with the study area<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 230<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors
Change language