sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors
4.2.2 Sydney DCPs Development control plans (DCPs) are non-statutory documents. They support LEPs by providing more detailed planning and design guidelines. Like the Sydney LEP, the policies and provisions of Sydney DCPs do not apply to the proposal (refer to section 4.1.1); however they are relevant in identifying potential land use impacts and planning policy conflicts. Twenty-six (26) DCPs have been developed to cover the City of Sydney LGA. Certain DCPs cover geographical areas whilst others cover certain activities and development-types. Five DCPs are relevant to this proposal: Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 (Sydney DCP) Central Sydney DCP 2006 Access DCP 2004 Contaminated Land DCP 2004 Heritage DCP 2006. These are discussed in turn below. Sydney DCP The Sydney DCP focuses on ensuring that development progresses in accordance with the following general objectives: Encouraging development that is consistent with the built environment and public domain Recognising and reinforcing the city centre’s distinctive characteristics, neighbourhoods and centres Building upon the Sydney LEP objectives and controls Protecting and enhancing the public domain and active street frontages Achieving the objectives of the city’s Sustainability Sydney 2030 strategy Encouraging development that maintains and enhances heritage character, heritage items and heritage conservation Encouraging ecologically sustainable development (ESD). In addition, the Sydney DCP contains locality statements and supporting principles for development within all areas and neighbourhoods of the city. The proposal is located in the ‘Central Sydney’ locality. Each locality contains a number of special character areas. In the case of Central Sydney, the special character areas are considered to ‘be of significance and importance to the identity and quality [of the locality] and include some or all of the following characteristics: A character that is unmatched elsewhere in Central Sydney A concentration of heritage items and streetscapes A highly distinctive element in the public domain A focus on public life with high cultural significance A widely acknowledged public identity’. Development in a special character area must: Retain and enhance the unique character of the area Ensure regard is given to the fabric and character of the area Conserve and protect heritage items and their settings Maintain daylight access Encourage active frontages to the public domain Conserve, maintain and enhance existing views and vistas to buildings and places of historic and aesthetic significance. Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 149 Review of Environmental Factors
The adopted urban design principles were developed to account for the above objectives (refer to section 3.2.4). The detailed design will be developed in accordance with the urban design principles to therefore ensure consistency with the Sydney DCP. Table 4-2 describes the relevant general DCP objectives and special character area development principles that are relevant to the proposal. The table also describes the proposal’s consistency, or otherwise, with these objectives and principles. Figure 4-2 shows the interface of the Sydney DCP zoning with the proposal footprint. Overall, the proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant general objectives of the DCP. Table 4-2 Consistency with the Sydney DCP objectives and principles Principles and objectives Consistency with permissibility and other objectives/principles General development principles Active frontages (York Street, King Street, Market Street, Wentworth Avenue) Work Sites: NW2(I-J), R1(A), R2(A-J), R4(C, K, M), R5(A-E), S1(E), S2(A), S3(A-B, D-G), C1(A-G) Provide a diverse range of activities to reinforce the vitality and liveliness of the public domain Encourage activities within buildings that positively contribute to the public domain Refer to Figure 4-3 The proposal would include traffic capacity improvements in certain locations that have defined active frontages The proposed footpath width alterations in certain locations (refer to Table 3-3 to Table 3- 7) would reduce the separation distance between the kerb and the building frontage Whilst this would not directly impact the public domain, it would affect certain businesses that rely on the extended kerb widths (eg restaurants, cafés). These businesses positively contribute to the public domain. Section 6.5.3 discusses the impact of this. Footpath awnings and colonnades (York Street, King Street, Market Street) Work sites: NW2(I-J), R1(A), R2(D-J), R3(A-B), R4(K, M), R5(C-E), S1(E-I), S2(A), S3(A-G), S4(A), S5(A- C), C1(A-D) Encourage footpath awnings to enhance pedestrian amenity and provide weather protection There would be no requirement to modify awning structures. The proposal would not prevent awnings being constructed in the future in accordance with the DCP specifications. Pedestrian priorities (King Street, Market Street) Work sites: F1(B), NW1(C), NW2(A-J), R1(A), R3(A, C, E), R4(E, I, K, M), R5(C-E), S1(E, I), S2(A), S3(A- G), C1(A) Development along certain streets in the city is controlled by setting pedestrian priorities. In these areas new vehicle access is either restricted or not preferred Outside of these designated streets development proposals The proposal would not introduce new vehicle access. As such, it would not affect pedestrian priorities It would have short-term impacts on a number of existing vehicle accesses during construction. Section 6.1.3 discusses this further No driveways or off-street vehicle accesses Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 150 Review of Environmental Factors
- Page 115 and 116: Ref (refer Fig 3-10 to 3-16) Propos
- Page 117 and 118: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 119 and 120: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 121 and 122: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 123 and 124: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 125 and 126: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 127 and 128: Wemyss Lane to Goulburn Street Ref
- Page 129 and 130: Macquarie Street intersection Campb
- Page 131 and 132: Park Street to Oxford Street Prince
- Page 133 and 134: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 135 and 136: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 137 and 138: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 139 and 140: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 141 and 142: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 143 and 144: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 145 and 146: 3.2 Design The proposal’s concept
- Page 147 and 148: Table 3-9 Engineering and developme
- Page 149 and 150: 3.3 Construction activities The lik
- Page 151 and 152: Table 3-10 Plant and equipment - in
- Page 153 and 154: These materials are widely availabl
- Page 155 and 156: Once the work is complete on site,
- Page 157 and 158: 3.6 Public utility and drainage adj
- Page 159 and 160: Traffic capacity improvement Precin
- Page 161 and 162: Traffic capacity improvement Locati
- Page 163 and 164: 4.1.3 Darling Harbour Development P
- Page 165: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 169 and 170: Principles and objectives Consisten
- Page 171 and 172: Principles and objectives Prot
- Page 173 and 174: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 175 and 176: Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
- Page 177 and 178: Roads and Maritime is, however, req
- Page 179 and 180: The one adverse outcome to deliveri
- Page 181 and 182: 5.1.2 Stakeholder engagement Roads
- Page 183 and 184: The detailed design would also be d
- Page 185 and 186: Traffic modelling and monitoring da
- Page 187 and 188: Bus infrastructure There is an exte
- Page 189 and 190: Cars, buses and other vehicles Over
- Page 191 and 192: Level of Service (LoS) Maximum queu
- Page 193 and 194: Work site location Precinct 4: coll
- Page 195 and 196: Section G: York Street intersection
- Page 197 and 198: Section Precinct 4: college C1: Wen
- Page 199 and 200: Location and type of work (refer to
- Page 201 and 202: with the proposed changes under the
- Page 203 and 204: Loading zones Mobility parking spac
- Page 205 and 206: Table 6-8 describes the temporary o
- Page 207 and 208: Location J: George Street to Pitt S
- Page 209 and 210: Location H: Hay Street to Rawson Pl
- Page 211 and 212: As can be seen from Table 6-8, ther
- Page 213 and 214: Table 6-9 Altered footpaths and ped
- Page 215 and 216: Section D: Abercrombie Street inter
4.2.2 Sydney DCPs<br />
Development control plans (DCPs) are non-statutory documents. They support LEPs<br />
by providing more detailed planning and design guidelines. Like the Sydney LEP, the<br />
policies and provisions <strong>of</strong> Sydney DCPs do not apply to the proposal (refer to<br />
section 4.1.1); however they are relevant in identifying potential land use impacts and<br />
planning policy conflicts.<br />
Twenty-six (26) DCPs have been developed to cover the City <strong>of</strong> Sydney LGA.<br />
Certain DCPs cover geographical areas whilst others cover certain activities and<br />
development-types. Five DCPs are relevant to this proposal:<br />
Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 (Sydney DCP)<br />
Central Sydney DCP 2006<br />
Access DCP 2004<br />
Contaminated Land DCP 2004<br />
Heritage DCP 2006.<br />
These are discussed in turn below.<br />
Sydney DCP<br />
The Sydney DCP focuses on ensuring that development progresses in accordance<br />
with the following general objectives:<br />
Encouraging development that is consistent with the built environment and<br />
public domain<br />
Recognising and reinforcing the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong>’s distinctive characteristics,<br />
neighbourhoods and <strong>centre</strong>s<br />
Building upon the Sydney LEP objectives and controls<br />
Protecting and enhancing the public domain and active street frontages<br />
Achieving the objectives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong>’s Sustainability Sydney 2030 strategy<br />
Encouraging development that maintains and enhances heritage character,<br />
heritage items and heritage conservation<br />
Encouraging ecologically sustainable development (ESD).<br />
In addition, the Sydney DCP contains locality statements and supporting principles<br />
for development within all areas and neighbourhoods <strong>of</strong> the <strong>city</strong>. The proposal is<br />
located in the ‘Central Sydney’ locality. Each locality contains a number <strong>of</strong> special<br />
character areas. In the case <strong>of</strong> Central Sydney, the special character areas are<br />
considered to ‘be <strong>of</strong> significance and importance to the identity and quality [<strong>of</strong> the<br />
locality] and include some or all <strong>of</strong> the following characteristics:<br />
A character that is unmatched elsewhere in Central Sydney<br />
A concentration <strong>of</strong> heritage items and streetscapes<br />
A highly distinctive element in the public domain<br />
A focus on public life with high cultural significance<br />
A widely acknowledged public identity’.<br />
Development in a special character area must:<br />
Retain and enhance the unique character <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
Ensure regard is given to the fabric and character <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
Conserve and protect heritage items and their settings<br />
Maintain daylight access<br />
Encourage active frontages to the public domain<br />
Conserve, maintain and enhance existing views and vistas to buildings and<br />
places <strong>of</strong> historic and aesthetic significance.<br />
Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 149<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors