sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

24.11.2014 Views

Effect construction traffic emissions Affected factors/receivers Construction workforce Location (also refer Figure 1-1) Overall, the predicted benefits of the proposal largely focus on supporting the reallocation and reprioritisation of traffic in the city centre due to the changes introduced under the Access Strategy. The majority of the adverse effects of the proposal would be felt during the construction phase and would be temporary disruptions. However key operational impacts comprise: Introduced time-restrictions preventing parking and loading at certain times of the day Impacts on pedestrian capacity and movement in some areas associated with alterations to footpath widths, removal of kerb extensions and pedestrian crossings An increase in traffic capacity within the affected road corridors, which would have a minor effect on each street’s amenity and streetscape character. As noted above, further work is underway to fully understand these impacts within the context of the other Access Strategy projects for light rail, buses and cycleways. Of key note, Transport for NSW and City of Sydney Council is in the process of developing a kerbside allocation strategy that will manage and prioritise the changes that need to occur within the city centre to deliver the Access Strategy. Stakeholder engagement is also underway to fully understand the varying needs of the diverse city centre businesses. This will assist in mitigating and managing the overall impacts on kerbside access in the city centre. Safeguards and management measures have been identified to avoid, reduce, address, manage and minimise the proposal’s predicted adverse impacts. These are summarised in Chapter 7. Providing these are implemented, there is expected to be no significant residual impact or cumulative effects resulting from the proposal’s construction or operation. Justification and conclusion The proposal’s justification balances the expected long-term benefits of the proposal against the typically shorter-term environmental and social impacts that would occur during construction and the major adverse effects on the city if the proposal was not implemented. The proposal would help to enable implementation of the other Access Strategy projects, including (40 per cent) of George Street being converted to a pedestrianised zone. The proposal offers a mechanism to improve road network efficiency and functionality and support the growing demand for access into Sydney city centre. The proposal would achieve this by maintaining and in some cases improving traffic capacity and efficiency on some of the city’s most congested roads and critical intersections, thereby support buses, taxies, service and freight delivery and general traffic. These ‘pinch points’ are either unable to cope with existing traffic volumes or they will provide an essential function in enabling key Access Strategy projects. By not implementing the proposal, congestion would increase across the city centre. Doing nothing would not make effective use of the road network, nor would it introduce the necessary increase in capacity, reallocation of road priorities or Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement Plan Review of Environmental Factors x

maintenance of traffic flows in the future. As such, the city centre road network would be unlikely to continue to function effectively once light rail is introduced. It would also be difficult to set other bus and cycle priorities without first relieving traffic congestion elsewhere across the network. As noted above, delivering the benefits of the proposal would have an impact on kerbside allocation provisions, most notably loading and on-street parking. The proposal has been careful in designing solutions that limit kerbside impacts. In many cases some loading provisions are retained or they are relocated elsewhere along the road. Subsequent to this proposal, Transport for NSW in collaboration with City of Sydney Council, is in the process of developing a kerbside allocation strategy that will manage and prioritise the changes that need to occur within the city centre to deliver the Access Strategy. When implementing kerbside allocation modifications across the city centre, space for taxi bays and zones, loading zones (delivery and service vehicles) and mobility parking would be a high priority. The proposal is expected to achieve its objectives, but would result in some environmental and social impacts as summarised above. The environmental impacts of the proposal are not likely to be significant and therefore it is not necessary for an environmental impact statement to be prepared and approval to be sought for the proposal from the Minister for Planning and Environment under part 5.1 of the EP&A Act. The proposal is unlikely to affect threatened species, populations or ecological communities or their habitats, within the meaning of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 or Fisheries Management Act 1994 and therefore a Species Impact Statement is not required. The proposal is also unlikely to affect Australian Government land or have an impact on any matters of national environmental significance. Display of the review of environmental factors This REF is on display for comment between Monday 24 November 2014 and Friday 9 January 2015. You can access the documents in the following ways. Internet The documents will be available as portable document files (pdfs) on the Roads and Maritime website at www.rms.gov.au and feedback can be provided at www.haveyoursay.nsw.gov.au. Display The review documents can be viewed at the following locations: City of Sydney Neighbourhood Service Centres City centre One Stop Shop Level 3 Town Hall House 456 Kent Street, Sydney City 2000 8.00am–6.00pm Monday–Friday Glebe 186 Glebe Point Road Glebe NSW 2037 9.00am–5.00pm Monday–Friday Redfern 158 Redfern Street Redfern NSW 2016 9.00am–5.00pm Monday–Friday 9.00am–1.00pm Saturday Green Square 100 Joynton Avenue Zetland NSW 2017 9.00am–6.00pm Monday–Friday Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement Plan Review of Environmental Factors xi

maintenance <strong>of</strong> traffic flows in the future. As such, the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> road network would<br />

be unlikely to continue to function effectively once light rail is introduced. It would also<br />

be difficult to set other bus and cycle priorities without first relieving traffic congestion<br />

elsewhere across the network.<br />

As noted above, delivering the benefits <strong>of</strong> the proposal would have an impact on<br />

kerbside allocation provisions, most notably loading and on-street parking. The<br />

proposal has been careful in designing solutions that limit kerbside impacts. In many<br />

cases some loading provisions are retained or they are relocated elsewhere along<br />

the road. Subsequent to this proposal, Transport for NSW in collaboration with City <strong>of</strong><br />

Sydney Council, is in the process <strong>of</strong> developing a kerbside allocation strategy that<br />

will manage and prioritise the changes that need to occur within the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong> to<br />

deliver the Access Strategy. When implementing kerbside allocation modifications<br />

across the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong>, space for taxi bays and zones, loading zones (delivery and<br />

service vehicles) and mobility parking would be a high priority.<br />

The proposal is expected to achieve its objectives, but would result in some<br />

<strong>environmental</strong> and social impacts as summarised above. The <strong>environmental</strong> impacts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the proposal are not likely to be significant and therefore it is not necessary for an<br />

<strong>environmental</strong> impact statement to be prepared and approval to be sought for the<br />

proposal from the Minister for Planning and Environment under part 5.1 <strong>of</strong> the EP&A<br />

Act. The proposal is unlikely to affect threatened species, populations or ecological<br />

communities or their habitats, within the meaning <strong>of</strong> the Threatened Species<br />

Conservation Act 1995 or Fisheries Management Act 1994 and therefore a Species<br />

Impact Statement is not required. The proposal is also unlikely to affect Australian<br />

Government land or have an impact on any matters <strong>of</strong> national <strong>environmental</strong><br />

significance.<br />

Display <strong>of</strong> the <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>factors</strong><br />

This REF is on display for comment between Monday 24 November 2014 and Friday<br />

9 January 2015. You can access the documents in the following ways.<br />

Internet<br />

The documents will be available as portable document files (pdfs) on the Roads and<br />

Maritime website at www.rms.gov.au and feedback can be provided at<br />

www.haveyoursay.nsw.gov.au.<br />

Display<br />

The <strong>review</strong> documents can be viewed at the following locations:<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Sydney Neighbourhood Service Centres<br />

City <strong>centre</strong><br />

One Stop Shop<br />

Level 3 Town Hall House<br />

456 Kent Street, Sydney City 2000<br />

8.00am–6.00pm Monday–Friday<br />

Glebe<br />

186 Glebe Point Road<br />

Glebe NSW 2037<br />

9.00am–5.00pm Monday–Friday<br />

Redfern<br />

158 Redfern Street<br />

Redfern NSW 2016<br />

9.00am–5.00pm Monday–Friday<br />

9.00am–1.00pm Saturday<br />

Green Square<br />

100 Joynton Avenue<br />

Zetland NSW 2017<br />

9.00am–6.00pm Monday–Friday<br />

Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement Plan<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors<br />

xi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!