24.11.2014 Views

Literature Review on Provision of Appropriate and Accessible ...

Literature Review on Provision of Appropriate and Accessible ...

Literature Review on Provision of Appropriate and Accessible ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PAGE 167<br />

5.2 Approaches to underst<strong>and</strong>ing issues for parents with<br />

intellectual disability<br />

Llewellyn et al. (2008: 293) identify three phases <strong>of</strong> research <strong>on</strong> parenting<br />

<strong>and</strong> adults with learning disabilities over the past six decades. The first<br />

phase, from the 1940s, primarily c<strong>on</strong>centrated <strong>on</strong> the heritability <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual disability. Nowadays, researchers no l<strong>on</strong>ger ask questi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

about whether people with intellectual disability should or should not be<br />

allowed to have children. Nevertheless, community <strong>and</strong> social attitudes<br />

can still be at variance with research evidence. During the sec<strong>on</strong>d phase,<br />

researchers turned their attenti<strong>on</strong> to parenting adequacy <strong>and</strong> parenting<br />

training. The third <strong>and</strong> current phase centres <strong>on</strong> a greater c<strong>on</strong>cern for the<br />

family, community <strong>and</strong> social c<strong>on</strong>text in which parents with intellectual<br />

disability <strong>and</strong> their children are located rather than <strong>on</strong> the individual<br />

parent.<br />

Support to People with an Intellectual Disability who are<br />

<strong>Accessible</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Appropriate</strong> <strong>of</strong> Provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Review</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Literature</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Experiencing Crisis Pregnancy<br />

Reinders’ analysis (2008) dem<strong>on</strong>strates how the principle <strong>of</strong> equality has<br />

guided research in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> its importance in highlighting<br />

discriminatory resp<strong>on</strong>ses based <strong>on</strong> stereotypes <strong>of</strong> people with<br />

intellectual disability as parents. He c<strong>on</strong>cludes (from an analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

debates surrounding parenting by people with intellectual disabilities)<br />

that there is not <strong>on</strong>e cause for the difficulties experienced by some<br />

parents with intellectual disability, <strong>and</strong> that designating psychological<br />

factors as the differential cause is inadequate.<br />

5.3 Tools for identifying parents with intellectual disabilities<br />

According to Tarlet<strong>on</strong> et al. (2006), a number <strong>of</strong> tools for identifying<br />

parents with learning disabilities have been developed in the UK to<br />

help staff identify whether a pers<strong>on</strong> has a learning difficulty. The<br />

S<strong>and</strong>ers<strong>on</strong> Screening Tool (also referred to as the STRAP-LD (Screening<br />

Tool Relating to the Assessment <strong>of</strong> Parents with suspected Learning<br />

Difficulties)) was designed to enable n<strong>on</strong>-psychologists to carry out a<br />

brief assessment with parents with suspected learning difficulties, to<br />

indicate whether a referral to clinical psychology services is necessary.<br />

This test was developed for health visitors, midwives, social workers<br />

<strong>and</strong> other pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>als <strong>and</strong> involves asking the adult to read a passage.<br />

Scores are provided for the number <strong>of</strong> mistakes made. The adult is then<br />

asked eight questi<strong>on</strong>s about the informati<strong>on</strong> in the passage. The tool<br />

is then returned to the psychology department that developed it, who

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!