24.11.2014 Views

Agenda Package - City of Vernon

Agenda Package - City of Vernon

Agenda Package - City of Vernon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

From:<br />

Sent:<br />

To:<br />

Cc:<br />

Subject:<br />

Don Barta Remax <strong>Vernon</strong> [donbarta@unction.net]<br />

Monday, February 08, 2010 2:38 PM<br />

Public Hearings<br />

donbarta@unction.net<br />

:, , i. L-f<br />

Official pù-dt¡c Hearing for Rezoning Bylaw #5234 (6500 Okanagan Avenüe) '-<br />

Dear Uåyor, Council and <strong>City</strong> Planner Dale M. Rintoul:<br />

RE: Opposition to Rezoning <strong>of</strong> the above Property.<br />

My name is Don Barta residing al6772Apollo Rd. and have deemed my property and in fact all<br />

póperty owners in <strong>Vernon</strong> affected by the subject rezon¡ng application. As this public hearing is<br />

related specifically to zoning, I will speak mainly <strong>of</strong> that issue. The Okanagan Landing area residents<br />

agreed to be annexed into the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vernon</strong> but rn overuvhelming attitude was to keep density <strong>of</strong><br />

hóusing in that part <strong>of</strong> the valley reasonable. The multi-family zoning allowing 12 units peracre was<br />

acceptãble if properly planned and placed. I oppose this creation <strong>of</strong> a new zoning which allows such a<br />

higher density and application <strong>of</strong> this density on the subject property.<br />

I ask each and every member <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> Council to ask themselves honestly if this zoning or<br />

development plan would be approved if the Applicant was a true arms-length or independent<br />

develoþer. Ev'en if the perceived benefits or incentives <strong>of</strong> addressing housing needs was <strong>of</strong>fered, my<br />

opinionls that this development proposal would be completely rejected based on location, ALR and<br />

tþtry irrigation implications and outright conflict with <strong>of</strong>ficial community plan and goals <strong>of</strong> promoting<br />

grown from <strong>City</strong> Center out.<br />

The whole process <strong>of</strong> approvals and support for this development are, in my opinion, in question<br />

starting witñ nlR removal application which not one remaining Council member had approved' l<br />

suggeõt that the ALR removal application be revisited and not hear excuses from The<br />

HJs-peria Development Corp. suggesting that ALR removal was granted as the lands were subject to<br />

a development pian some 28 yeãrs ago. lf that's the case, I cannot support a new or changed<br />

development plan now that removal has been obtained.<br />

! also caution the <strong>City</strong> and the Hesperia Development Corp. that manipulating the laws.<strong>of</strong> supply and<br />

demand could prove devastating to the competing, arms length developer who will seek<br />

compensation or level playing field in zoning density when the realize that the <strong>City</strong> and Hesperia<br />

Devålopment Corp are.compéting for a limited number <strong>of</strong> potential customers. This zoning and<br />

development is not appropriate fõr this property and the Devel<br />

not be played<br />

witn fáipayer Dollars.'Perhaps further <strong>City</strong> support for private<br />

relaxed zoning or<br />

loped areas.<br />

DCCs foi piedetermined redevelopment incentives is a viable<br />

Thanks for allowing me to comment as part <strong>of</strong> this Public Hearing<br />

Don Barta<br />

6772 Apollo rd<br />

<strong>Vernon</strong>, BC<br />

V1H 1J3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!