24.11.2014 Views

Agenda Package - City of Vernon

Agenda Package - City of Vernon

Agenda Package - City of Vernon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-2-<br />

Fees and Charges Bylaw are being proposed this year. An overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recommended fee changes is as follows:<br />

a) lnsert a new fee <strong>of</strong> $50 for a one year extension to a Development Permit<br />

approval. This is to cover the time to review and respond to the extension<br />

request. ln most cases, such requests are straight forward and the<br />

extension letter requires no revisions to the approval conditions.<br />

b) lnsert a new fee <strong>of</strong> $50 for a landscape and irrigation re-inspection related<br />

to a Development Permit. Once landscaping and irrigation are installed,<br />

applicants request a staff inspection. lf there are deficiencies with the<br />

landscaping and irrigation, staff re-inspect the installation after the<br />

deficiencies are corrected. Sometimes there are multiple re-inspections. A<br />

re-inspection fee would provide an incentive for the landscaping and<br />

irrigation to be installed from the onset in accordance with approved plans,<br />

c) Decrease the fee for a Heritage Alteration Permit (HAP) from $1,100 to<br />

$200. HAPs are only applied to heritage propeilies and require a minimal<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> work - specifically design review. The $1,100 currently collected<br />

is an impedíment to the regular refurbishment and development <strong>of</strong><br />

properties which are listed on the Heritage Register. Property owners have<br />

indicated a perceived bias against heritage property owners and have<br />

indicated a reluctance to remain on the Heritage Register because <strong>of</strong> this.<br />

Lowering the cost <strong>of</strong> the HAP would remove some <strong>of</strong> the perceived bias and<br />

signal a willingness on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> to continue to preserve heritage<br />

buildings and support owners <strong>of</strong> heritage properties'<br />

d) Decrease the fee for a renewal <strong>of</strong> a Development Permit from $500 to $200.<br />

Development Permit renewals require a minimal amount <strong>of</strong> staff time in<br />

comparison to Development Variance Permit renewals. As such, the fee for<br />

reviewing a Development Permit file and issuing a renewal should be less.<br />

A fee <strong>of</strong> $200 is sufficient to <strong>of</strong>fset the staff time to review and issue a<br />

renewal for a Development Permit.<br />

e) Remove the fee for Environmental Development Permits as the <strong>City</strong> no<br />

longer issues such permits.<br />

f) Remove fee 'T) Liquor Licence Application Fee' from the fee schedule as it<br />

is a repeat <strong>of</strong> 'P) Liquor Licence Application Fee'.<br />

g) lnsert a $500 strata conversion application fee in order to cover the staff<br />

costs to review the application, present a report to Council and follow up<br />

actions if the application is approved.<br />

r04

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!