24.11.2014 Views

Prospects for silvoarable agroforestry at the European scale - Inra

Prospects for silvoarable agroforestry at the European scale - Inra

Prospects for silvoarable agroforestry at the European scale - Inra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Prospects</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>silvoarable</strong><br />

agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>scale</strong><br />

The end-users point of view...


Farmers’ issues<br />

The SAFE project surveyed farmers from<br />

7 <strong>European</strong> countries to describe <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>at</strong>titude to modern agro<strong>for</strong>estry (WP2)


14 regions – 270 farmers


Are <strong>European</strong> farmers ready <strong>for</strong><br />

Agro<strong>for</strong>estry?<br />

Face to face interviews with cereal farmers<br />

who knew nothing about agro<strong>for</strong>estry


Are <strong>European</strong> farmers ready <strong>for</strong><br />

Agro<strong>for</strong>estry?<br />

60%<br />

Would you <strong>at</strong>tempt a <strong>silvoarable</strong> project ?<br />

50%<br />

48%<br />

40%<br />

36%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

16%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Yes Don't know No<br />

48 % of <strong>European</strong> farmers interviewed would be interested to<br />

introduce agro<strong>for</strong>estry plots on <strong>the</strong>ir farm…<br />

(From 20% to 80 %, from Nor<strong>the</strong>rn to Mediterranean countries)


Are <strong>European</strong> farmers ready <strong>for</strong><br />

Agro<strong>for</strong>estry?<br />

They would envisage planting 20% of <strong>the</strong>ir farm with<br />

agro<strong>for</strong>estry, in fertile or medium soil<br />

But <strong>the</strong>re is a strong variability depending on <strong>the</strong><br />

farmers’ objectives…


AF meets 8 objectives <strong>for</strong> <strong>European</strong> farmers<br />

• Diversific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

• Profitability<br />

• Reversibility<br />

• Feasibility<br />

• Environnemental Impact<br />

• Public perception of farmers activity<br />

• Pleasure<br />

• Social arrangement


Diversific<strong>at</strong>ion


To diversify by planting trees in<br />

agricultural land<br />

LER = 1 LER > 1<br />

Agro<strong>for</strong>estry is a progressive and productive<br />

diversific<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> farm activities


Profitability<br />

This 60 year old walnut grove (156 trees/ha) is valued <strong>at</strong> 120 000 euros of<br />

timber per hectare


Profitability<br />

% of Farm Gross Margin without AF<br />

175<br />

150<br />

125<br />

100<br />

75<br />

Farm with 8% <strong>silvoarable</strong> area<br />

Farm with 100 % of cropping area<br />

178% 180% 191% 183%<br />

Will significantly increase<br />

<strong>the</strong> farm income in <strong>the</strong> long term<br />

(x2 with walnut trees on 50%;<br />

x1.2 with wild cherry on 20%)<br />

50<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%<br />

% of <strong>the</strong> first tree rot<strong>at</strong>ion


Profitability<br />

But farmers will not adopt agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />

only <strong>for</strong> long term profitability.<br />

Profitability is relevant <strong>for</strong> successors who<br />

will inherit of <strong>the</strong> trees.<br />

The cash income during <strong>the</strong> first years<br />

after <strong>the</strong> tree plant<strong>at</strong>ion is <strong>the</strong> major<br />

financial concern <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> farmer.


Reversibility


Feasibility<br />

•Easy to master<br />

•1 to 2 days/year/ha<br />

• Labour optimiz<strong>at</strong>ion


Complying with GAEC and<br />

<strong>European</strong> Directives...<br />

Improving profitability<br />

(hunting, inputs<br />

Environmental impact


Farmer’s image


Pleasure and farm landscape


Tenant farmers and land owners can agree<br />

to manage agro<strong>for</strong>estry plots<br />

Social arrangement


Wh<strong>at</strong> prospect <strong>for</strong> modern<br />

<strong>silvoarable</strong> agro<strong>for</strong>estry in<br />

Europe ?<br />

The SAFE project predictions (WP8)


Wh<strong>at</strong> potential in Europe?<br />

• 90 Millions of hectares suitable <strong>for</strong> AF<br />

• Including 65 millions d’hectares with<br />

environmental problems th<strong>at</strong> AF could mitig<strong>at</strong>e<br />

• But <strong>the</strong> concept is still confidential in most<br />

countries (France is leading)


Where can SAF yield environmental benefits?<br />

Arable land<br />

Potential productive<br />

growth of SAFE<br />

tree species<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

conditions<br />

Problems of erosion<br />

Low landscape diversity<br />

N-leaching<br />

‚Target area‘


Target areas<br />

650’000 km 2<br />

(40% of <strong>European</strong><br />

arable land)<br />

Arable land<br />

Potential productive<br />

growth of SAFE<br />

tree species<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

conditions<br />

Problems of<br />

erosion<br />

N-leaching<br />

low landscape diversity<br />

‚Target area‘


Wh<strong>at</strong> future <strong>for</strong> Agro<strong>for</strong>estry ?<br />

The French case<br />

• Be<strong>for</strong>e 2001, agro<strong>for</strong>estry was not taken into account in <strong>the</strong><br />

French Regul<strong>at</strong>ions (CAP)<br />

• In 2001, farmers obtained 3 re<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong> <strong>silvoarable</strong> systems:<br />

1. The intercrop area became eligible to <strong>the</strong> crop payment (1st pillar)<br />

2. Owners could get a grant <strong>for</strong> tree plant<strong>at</strong>ion (2nd pillar)<br />

3. Farmers could benefit from an agro<strong>for</strong>estry AEM<br />

After 2001,<br />

we observe a development of a modern agro<strong>for</strong>estry…


Wh<strong>at</strong> future <strong>for</strong> modern <strong>silvoarable</strong> systems ?<br />

The French case<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

Evolution of annual area planted in agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />

Years 2000-2005<br />

1 500 ha<br />

in 2006<br />

1000<br />

hectare<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0 ha in<br />

2001<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Year<br />

Cumul<strong>at</strong>ed Existing In study Applicant


Wh<strong>at</strong> future <strong>for</strong> Agro<strong>for</strong>estry ?<br />

The French case<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

Interested<br />

Undecided<br />

Agains t<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Interview<br />

Phone call<br />

Evolution of <strong>the</strong> farmers’ interest 2 years after <strong>the</strong> interviews...


Wh<strong>at</strong> future <strong>for</strong> Agro<strong>for</strong>estry ?<br />

The French case<br />

Interested<br />

Undecided<br />

Agains t<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

70 % of <strong>the</strong><br />

interested farmers<br />

have already<br />

initi<strong>at</strong>ed a project<br />

0%<br />

Interview<br />

Phone call<br />

Farmers maintained <strong>the</strong>ir interest 2 years after <strong>the</strong> interviews...


Wh<strong>at</strong> future <strong>for</strong> Agro<strong>for</strong>estry ?<br />

The French case<br />

• It is considered in France th<strong>at</strong> 20% of farmers may<br />

introduce agro<strong>for</strong>estry on 10% of <strong>the</strong>ir farm within <strong>the</strong> next<br />

20 years. This would result in 500 000 ha of agro<strong>for</strong>estry.<br />

• It would reduce French agriculture production by less than<br />

2%.<br />

• It would produce enough high quality timber to meet France<br />

needs <strong>for</strong> high quality timber in 2050.<br />

• The environmental impact would be very positive


But existing regul<strong>at</strong>ions have to be improved<br />

• The subsidy <strong>for</strong> tree plant<strong>at</strong>ion is currently not available <strong>for</strong><br />

most farmers : <strong>the</strong> regul<strong>at</strong>ions limit grants to experimental<br />

projects including a follow-up work by a research institute!<br />

• The AEM <strong>for</strong> agro<strong>for</strong>estry is no longer available, and was<br />

only applied in two French Provinces.


In France also, <strong>the</strong> future of agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />

is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e not bright<br />

End-users need improvements of n<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

policies th<strong>at</strong> would be facilit<strong>at</strong>ed by a<br />

<strong>European</strong> example


Wh<strong>at</strong> future <strong>for</strong> Agro<strong>for</strong>estry ?<br />

80% of <strong>the</strong> farmers we interviewed want to be contacted again<br />

Most of <strong>the</strong>m want to visit some concrete experiences be<strong>for</strong>e taking decisions<br />

“Your system is fantastic! Sorry to tell you<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, but if you don’t succeed to change <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> regul<strong>at</strong>ions to take into account <strong>the</strong><br />

agro<strong>for</strong>estry specific<strong>at</strong>ions, you are an idiot!<br />

Sorry to tell you th<strong>at</strong> but it’s true!!”<br />

Mr Albert F. February 2004 – Champlitte France


But policy is ano<strong>the</strong>r story…

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!