24.11.2014 Views

Government 131 Syllabus - Department of Government at Cornell ...

Government 131 Syllabus - Department of Government at Cornell ...

Government 131 Syllabus - Department of Government at Cornell ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction to Compar<strong>at</strong>ive Politics<br />

<strong>Government</strong> <strong>131</strong><br />

T-Th 1140-1255P KL B11<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ronald Herring<br />

Head TA Karrie J. Koesel" kjk32@cornell.edu<br />

Website: http://www.blackboard.cornell.edu/<br />

<strong>Syllabus</strong><br />

Course Objectives: This course introduces a field called “Compar<strong>at</strong>ive Politics” in most<br />

political science departments in the United St<strong>at</strong>es. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive politics deals with both<br />

substance and method: wh<strong>at</strong> is compared and how is it to be compared. In a way, we will<br />

be exploring the social-science version <strong>of</strong> the common rhetorical point: “you can’t<br />

compare apples and oranges.” Actually, you can – both are fruits, grow on trees, have<br />

seeds inside, but differ in other ways. But comparison is possible, and might be fruitful –<br />

apples are currently being re-valid<strong>at</strong>ed as a uniquely healthful food: there is now<br />

phytochemical evidence to confirm the adage th<strong>at</strong> “an apple a day keeps the doctor<br />

away.”<br />

Apples and oranges then can be compared. Any sensible person would want to<br />

know the terms <strong>of</strong> comparison, the purpose <strong>of</strong> the comparison and, as Donald Rumsfeld<br />

famously said, the metric. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive str<strong>at</strong>egies are common in political rhetoric and as<br />

a method for testing out general tendencies across different social systems; comparisons<br />

involve methodological choices, and <strong>of</strong>ten norm<strong>at</strong>ive choices as well. These we seek to<br />

elucid<strong>at</strong>e. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive inquiry <strong>of</strong>ten leads to conditional findings <strong>of</strong> the general sort:<br />

under the following conditions, ethnic conflict is more common in societies <strong>of</strong> this type<br />

than <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> type. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive analysis informs theory building in the social sciences and<br />

feeds into policy choices: wh<strong>at</strong> happens if X is done instead <strong>of</strong> Y? We seek to find<br />

compar<strong>at</strong>ive logics th<strong>at</strong> are rigorous and useful in this sense.<br />

Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion: There will be an exam early enough in the term to allow assessment before<br />

the add/drop deadline; this exam will count for 20% <strong>of</strong> the final grade; a paper due on the<br />

final day <strong>of</strong> class, and rooted in readings for <strong>131</strong>, requiring no research beyond your own<br />

case-study journal, will account for another 20%. Performance in section will account for<br />

15% and the final examin<strong>at</strong>ion for 45%.<br />

Texts: Available <strong>at</strong> The Campus Store and on reserve <strong>at</strong> Uris.<br />

Amy Chua, World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Dcmocracy Breeds<br />

Ethnic H<strong>at</strong>red and Global Insecurity<br />

Siddarth Dube, In the Land <strong>of</strong> Poverty<br />

Milton Esman and Ronald Herring, Carrots, Sticks and Ethnic Conflict:<br />

Rethinking Development Assistance<br />

Gosta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds <strong>of</strong> Welfare Capitalism<br />

1


P<strong>at</strong>rick O’Neil and Ronald Rogowski, Essential Readings in Compar<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

Politics [Hereafter O and R]<br />

Nicholas van de Walle, African Economies and the Politics <strong>of</strong> Permanent<br />

Crisis<br />

Additional Reading: Every student is to choose a society to follow all semester; track it<br />

through the topics we cover in class. Becoming grounded in a particular place will make<br />

help you grasp the abstractions in the theory we will be reading much better and will<br />

improve convers<strong>at</strong>ions in section. Choose a society other than one you consider your<br />

own. If you have not grown up in the United St<strong>at</strong>es, it makes a good case. Learn about<br />

the case via wh<strong>at</strong>ever tools seem comp<strong>at</strong>ible with your learning style. The web is clearly<br />

the most efficient source. Try the CIA World Fact Book<br />

http://www.cia.gov/cia/public<strong>at</strong>ions/factbook/ for a broad overview <strong>of</strong> societies. The<br />

United N<strong>at</strong>ions Development Program: http://www.undp.org/regions/countries/ has<br />

compar<strong>at</strong>ive d<strong>at</strong>a for substantive issues in different countries considered poor by global<br />

standards; http://hdr.undp.org/st<strong>at</strong>istics/ . For World Bank inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSi<br />

tePK:136917,00.html . The Economist has both current news and basic compar<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a: http://www.economist.com/countries/ . If you are less economistic in outlook, you<br />

might peruse Freedom House’s country indices: http://www.freedomhouse.org/ .<br />

Transparency Intern<strong>at</strong>ional [http://www.transparency.org/] ranks countries compar<strong>at</strong>ively<br />

by an index <strong>of</strong> corruption. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive public opinion d<strong>at</strong>a can be found through<br />

Eurobarometer [ http://www.gesis.org/en/d<strong>at</strong>a_service/eurobarometer .] If you are<br />

especially interested in repression and human rights, see compar<strong>at</strong>ive d<strong>at</strong>a in Amnesty<br />

Intern<strong>at</strong>ional’s country reports: http://web.amnesty.org/library/engworld/2am . These<br />

links and others will be on the course website. There are other possibilities you can<br />

discuss in section. Track how the press tre<strong>at</strong>s events in your case, how the case rel<strong>at</strong>es to<br />

the larger generaliz<strong>at</strong>ions the authors you read are making. Keep a diary <strong>of</strong> these notes;<br />

you will write a short paper l<strong>at</strong>er in the semester based on these notes. In addition,<br />

optional readings will be suggested in class and section.<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> January 24: Compared to Wh<strong>at</strong>? Logics <strong>of</strong> Inquiry<br />

Chua: 1-17; O and R: 1-31<br />

Browse heavily the recommended websites or other sources; select a case study to<br />

follow for the semester. Peruse texts before choosing.<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> January 3: Wh<strong>at</strong> to Compare: N<strong>at</strong>ions, St<strong>at</strong>es, Individuals, Processes<br />

O and R: pp 70-105; 32-69<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> February 7: Systemic Differences I: Conceptualizing Whole Political<br />

Systems -- Authoritarianisms and Democracies<br />

O and R: 152-229; 239-277<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> February 14: Systemic Differences II: Compar<strong>at</strong>ive Political Economy--<br />

Who Gets Wh<strong>at</strong> and How?<br />

O and R: 114-151<br />

2


Dube: 1-42<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> February 21: Disaggreg<strong>at</strong>ing Systems: Poverty, Social Justice and Symbolic<br />

Politics<br />

Dube : 43-184<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> February 28: Review and Recapitul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Tuesday March 1: Concepts So Far<br />

Thursday March 3: Prelim<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> March 7: Development: P<strong>at</strong>terns and Exceptionalism<br />

O and R: 360-432<br />

Van de Walle: 1-19<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> March 14: The Regional Exceptionalism <strong>of</strong> Africa: Permant Crisis?<br />

Van de Walle pp 20-63; 150-151; 188-234; 271-286<br />

Esman and Herring 90-112<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> March 21: Spring Break!<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> March 28: Post-Communisms and Transitions<br />

O and R: 322-359<br />

Chua: 77-94<br />

Esman and Herring: 175-209<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> April 4: Globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion: Institutions, Processes, Ideas<br />

Chua: 23-49; 95-125<br />

O and R: pp 433-462<br />

Esman and Herring: pp 1-25; 210-235. Optional: 26-48<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> April 11: Primordial Loyalties: Ethno-n<strong>at</strong>ionalism, Ethnic Politics and<br />

Democracy<br />

Chua: 127-258<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> April 18: Political Violence<br />

O and R: 463-510<br />

Esman and Herring, pp 113-174<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> April 25: Why Does Human Welfare Vary Across High-Income<br />

Democracies? Comparing Welfare St<strong>at</strong>es<br />

Esping-Andersen: 1-78; 105-138; 221-229<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> May 2: Futures<br />

Esman and Herring: 235-254. Optional: 49-89<br />

Van de Walle: 235-270<br />

Chua: 259-294<br />

3


O and R: 230-238; 278-321<br />

Final Examin<strong>at</strong>ion: Thurs 19-May<br />

3:00- 5:30 pm<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!