24.11.2014 Views

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"1(A)(2) A person who owing to a well-founded fear <strong>of</strong> being persecuted for reasons <strong>of</strong><br />

race, religion, nationality, membership <strong>of</strong> a particular social group or political opinion, is<br />

outside the country <strong>of</strong> his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to<br />

avail himself <strong>of</strong> the protection <strong>of</strong> that country; or who, not having a nationality and being<br />

outside the country <strong>of</strong> his former habitual residence as a result <strong>of</strong> such events, is unable<br />

or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.”<br />

While the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees <strong>of</strong>fers a broad range <strong>of</strong> rights, what<br />

is sought to be examined in this section is the condition <strong>of</strong> those detainees inside <strong>Turin</strong>’s <strong>CIE</strong><br />

who are asylum seekers and have not yet qualified for the level <strong>of</strong> protection guaranteed to a<br />

refugee, or those who have applied for a subsidiary protection status. The best practice<br />

standards for the procedure <strong>of</strong> determining a refugee application have been articulated in the<br />

UNHCR Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951<br />

Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees 140 and the Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Europe’s Guidelines on Human Rights Protection in the Context <strong>of</strong> Accelerated Asylum<br />

Procedures 141 .<br />

<strong>International</strong> law permits the detention <strong>of</strong> asylum seekers but restricts such actions by way <strong>of</strong><br />

Article 31(1) <strong>of</strong> the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees, which disallows the State<br />

from imposition <strong>of</strong> penalties on irregular entrants in cases where they have come directly from<br />

a State where they claim to have been persecuted if “[…] they present themselves without delay<br />

to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence”. Article 31(2) further<br />

restricts unnecessary prohibitions on movement:<br />

“31(2) The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements <strong>of</strong> such refugees<br />

restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be<br />

applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into<br />

another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period<br />

and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.”<br />

Furthermore, the UNHCR Revised Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to the<br />

Detention <strong>of</strong> Asylum-Seekers 142 and relevant Conclusions 143 together militate against detention<br />

and require the State to justify each individual detention decision as being necessary and for a<br />

specific purpose and to be as brief as possible. Detention is to be permitted only where it is<br />

necessary and lawful in order to verify identity, to determine the truth <strong>of</strong> the basis for an asylum<br />

claim, to deal with cases <strong>of</strong> destroyed or fraudulent identity documents or for national security<br />

or public order 144 .<br />

Moreover, the UNHCR Revised Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to the<br />

Detention <strong>of</strong> Asylum-Seekers state that “conditions <strong>of</strong> detention for asylum-seekers should be<br />

140 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining<br />

Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees<br />

HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1 Reedited, Geneva, January 1992, UNHCR 1979.<br />

141 Committee <strong>of</strong> Ministers <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe, Guidelines on human rights protection in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

accelerated asylum procedures, adopted by the Committee <strong>of</strong> Ministers <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe on 1 July 2009<br />

at the 1062nd meeting <strong>of</strong> the Ministers’ Deputies.<br />

142 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Revised Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards<br />

relating to the Detention <strong>of</strong> Asylum-Seekers, UNHCR, 26 February 1999, Guidelines 2 and 3.<br />

143 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Conclusion No. 44 (XXXVII) Detention <strong>of</strong> Refugees and<br />

Asylum-Seekers, ExCom, UNHCR, 37th Session, 1986, para. B.<br />

144 Id.; United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Conclusion No. 85 (XLIX) <strong>International</strong> Protection,<br />

ExCom, UNHCR, 49th Session, 1998, para. (w); United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Revised<br />

Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to the Detention <strong>of</strong> Asylum-Seekers, Guideline 3.<br />

76 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!