Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

no.racism.net
from no.racism.net More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

“[A]t times police beat people. A policeman threatened to kill him [a fellow detainee]. A policeman entered the room at night and beat him up for no reason. Once the Guardia di Finanza entered in the isolation room where there was a guy and they beat him up harshly They should not even enter into the isolation rooms. I saw this with my eyes 91 . And nothing was done to those Finanzieri. […]I’m talking about the military personnel […]. More precisely, I’m not talking about the army, they are good guys. Rather, I’m talking about the Finanzieri and Carabinieri, they are the ones that tend to be dangerous” (Interview 15). It is difficult to measure the level of violence inside immigration detention: “However inside CIE there is a space of suspension of the law: if a policeman beats you, of course you cannot denounce it” (Interview 28). We received allegations that the controversial measures of high-pressure water cannons and tear gas have been used inside Turin’s CIE: “In October the Carabinieri came because the guys were causing trouble, they were protesting, trying to escape and Carabinieri used a lot of tear gas against them. But it was horrible for the girls as well: we were feeling really bad, our eyes hurting and full of tears” (Interview 17) 92 ; “Yesterday evening, the guys in the area near our area started a revolt 93 . It was the Blue Area. They caused a big racket. Guards came with batons and helmets. They were Carabinieri, Polizia, Guarda di Finanza and the Army, all of them. And, they shot us with water [water cannons]. I was sleeping. I heard the noise so all of us went out from our rooms. We saw all of these guards there. Some of them were shooting water and some of them were beating up the guys from the Blue Area. When they shot with water it was really something strong. The water has a pressure similar to seventy or eighty kilometers per hour. It’s like as if they were shooting with guns” (Interview 22). Police use of water cannons has come under extremely negative criticism due to the harm that can be caused by them. For example, in September 2010 in Stuttgart, Germany a protester was blinded by a water cannon 94 . Given the enclosed spaces within the CIE and the complete control exerted over the CIE inmates, the use of such extreme measures is highly questionable. The detainees inside the CIE are all rights holders and have the right to be treated with dignity and in a humane manner. The obligation that a State has to protect individuals within detention from violence is even higher owing to the fact that detained individuals are wholly under the control and care of State facilities. Indeed, the ECtHR has expressly ruled that if any individual within detention is subjected to any kind of cruel or inhuman treatment or is killed within detention, then the burden of proof is on the State 95 . We repeatedly heard from detainees that there was no accessible way to complain about specific individuals’ behaviour at Turin’s CIE. Yet, the State has a positive obligation to protect detainees against harmful actions by State 91 From the Violet Area it might be possible to see the isolation cells. See the map of Turin’s CIE under Part B. Conditions of Detention, Chapter IV. Day-to-day Issues. 92 The women’s area (Green Area) is located next to two male areas. See the map of Turin’s CIE under Part B. Conditions of Detention, Chapter IV. Day-to-day Issues. 93 This detainee was living in the Red Area. 94 See for example: Unknown author, “Blinded Stuttgart 21 protester wants apology”, The Local: Germany’s News in English (online), 28 December 2010 . 95 Anguelova v. Bulgaria, 38361/97, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 13 June 2002, paras. 110-111; Salman v. Turkey, 21986/93, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 27 June 2000, para. 100; Demiray v. Turkey, 27308/95, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 21 November 2000. 54 | P a g e

agents. All of the CIE staff are subject to this positive legal obligation because they are either State authorities (military personnel) or quasi-State authorities (Red Cross) who are discharging State functions. 55 | P a g e

agents. All <strong>of</strong> the <strong>CIE</strong> staff are subject to this positive legal obligation because they are either<br />

State authorities (military personnel) or quasi-State authorities (Red Cross) who are<br />

discharging State functions.<br />

55 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!