24.11.2014 Views

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

Turin's CIE - International University College of Turin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

II.<br />

FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS, CHILDREN AND <strong>CIE</strong><br />

1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK: THE RIGHT TO FAMILY AND PRIVATE LIFE<br />

A significant portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>CIE</strong> detainees have family members such as children, a husband, a wife<br />

or a long-term partner who live in Italy. Some detainees have also resided in Italy for many<br />

years and consequently they have established their lives here. A long-term immigrant can end<br />

up in <strong>CIE</strong> for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons. The most common <strong>of</strong> these are: residence permits expiring<br />

without renewal, residence permits being terminated due to either loss <strong>of</strong> employment or<br />

criminal conduct, or never having had an Italian visa in the first place.<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Europe<br />

The right to respect everyone’s private and family life is protected by human rights laws at<br />

European Union, Council <strong>of</strong> Europe and international levels. Article 8 <strong>of</strong> the ECHR states:<br />

“8(1) Every-one has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his<br />

correspondence.<br />

8(2) There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise <strong>of</strong> this right<br />

except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in<br />

the interests <strong>of</strong> national security, public safety or the economic well-being <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country, for the prevention <strong>of</strong> disorder or crime, for the protection <strong>of</strong> health or morals,<br />

or for the protection <strong>of</strong> the rights and freedoms <strong>of</strong> others.”<br />

Article 8 ECHR is both a positive and negative right. Whilst a fundamental aim <strong>of</strong> Article 8 ECHR<br />

is to “protect the individual against arbitrary action by the public authorities”, there may also be<br />

positive obligations inherent in effective “respect” for family life” 18 . The implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

Article 8 ECHR is complex and the article does not specify conditions under which an irregular<br />

immigrant can be detained or deported. However, some <strong>of</strong> the findings in this chapter do call<br />

into question whether Italian authorities are consistently and proportionately balancing the<br />

right to family and private life with infringements that are necessary to pursue a legitimate aim<br />

that is necessary in a democratic society 19 .<br />

European Union Law<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> the right to respect family and private life is echoed in EU Directive<br />

2003/86/EC <strong>of</strong> 22 September 2003 20 on the right to family reunification. Furthermore, EU<br />

Directive 2008/115/EC <strong>of</strong> 16 December 2008 21 (“Return Directive”) establishes common<br />

standards and procedures for EU Member States in cases in which third-country nationals may<br />

be removed from their territories. The Return Directive specifically states that Member States<br />

18 Kroon and Others v. The Netherlands, 18535/91, 27 October 1994, para. 31. See also, Gül v. Switzerland,<br />

53/1995/559/645, Council <strong>of</strong> Europe: European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, 22 January 1996, para. 38.<br />

19 On the proportionality test, see for example: Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, 13178/03,<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Europe: European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, 12 October 2006; A.W. Khan v. United Kingdom,<br />

47486/06, Council <strong>of</strong> Europe: European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, 12 January 2010; Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v.<br />

the Netherlands, 60665/00, Council <strong>of</strong> Europe: European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights,19 October 2004.<br />

20 Council Directive 2003/86/EC <strong>of</strong> 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, L 251/12 Official<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the European Union, 3.10.2003.<br />

21 Directive 2008/115/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 16 December 2008 on common<br />

standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, L 348/98<br />

Official Journal <strong>of</strong> the European Union, 24.12.2008.<br />

18 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!