24.11.2014 Views

child care - Digital Library Collections

child care - Digital Library Collections

child care - Digital Library Collections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHILO<br />

HEALTH<br />

is, for those who assume the legal responsibility of<br />

paying for their workers' health <strong>care</strong> (although<br />

many such employers use insurance companies to<br />

administer health coverage). Forty percent of<br />

Americans with coverage through work have employers<br />

who self-insure. These workers and their<br />

families are not protected by state statutes regulating<br />

managed <strong>care</strong>; only the federal government can<br />

give them the protection ofconsumer safeguards.<br />

Toward the end of 1997, several events foreshadowed<br />

a major congressional struggle in 1998<br />

over managed <strong>care</strong> safeguards. In November 1997<br />

the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer<br />

Protection and Quality in the Health Care<br />

Industry recommended enforceable, national<br />

standards to strengthen consumers' rights. The<br />

President called for federal legislation to imple.­<br />

ment these recommendations. However, while consumers<br />

and others were pushing for stronger patient<br />

protections, opposition began to form among<br />

some insurers, employers, and other interest<br />

groups. Newspapers reported meetings between<br />

such interest groups and the majority leadership in<br />

Congress to plan strategy for blocking enactment<br />

of managed <strong>care</strong> safeguards.<br />

These events were accompanied by the intrcr<br />

duction of major managed <strong>care</strong> legislation with<br />

considerable bipartisan cosponsorship in the<br />

House and Senate. More than 70 health <strong>care</strong> quality<br />

bills were introduced in Congress in 1997, and<br />

advocates of managed <strong>care</strong> reform promised vigorous<br />

action in 1998.<br />

Progress in Maternal and<br />

Child Health<br />

According to data released in 1997 by the National<br />

Center for Health Statistics (NCHS),<br />

fewer women died of complications during<br />

<strong>child</strong>birth in 1995 than in 1994, a higher percentage<br />

of babies were born to mothers receiving early<br />

prenatal <strong>care</strong>, and fewer babies died before their<br />

flISt birthday. At the same time, however, the<br />

percentage of babies born at low birthweight<br />

(5.5 pounds or less) remained at its highest level in<br />

20 years.<br />

Other newly released data from NCHS show<br />

modest health gains for Black <strong>child</strong>ren and pregnant<br />

women in 1995. Infant mortality and low<br />

birthweight were down and prenatal <strong>care</strong> rates<br />

were up, continuing their improvement since 1990.<br />

This has been a welcome trend after nearly a decade<br />

of stagnant or worsening indicators in low<br />

birthweight and prenatal <strong>care</strong> during the 1980s.<br />

Improvement in Black infant mortality in particular<br />

accelerated after the Medicaid expansion in<br />

1989, which was accompanied by a broad range of<br />

community-based efforts to reduce infant deaths<br />

among Blacks. The five years before 1989 saw only<br />

a 3.1 percent reduction in Black infant mortality,<br />

while the mortality rate dropped more than 16<br />

percent between 1990 and 1995.<br />

Following are some key statistics. The appendices<br />

present additional data on rates of early prenatal<br />

<strong>care</strong>, low birthweight, and infant mortality.<br />

• The overall infant mortality rate has been falling<br />

for decades, reaching a record low in 1995<br />

(the latest year for which frnal data are available).<br />

In that year, 29,583 babies died before<br />

their first birthday, putting the rate at 7.6<br />

deaths per 1,000 live births-far below the infant<br />

mortality rate of 17.7 two decades earlier<br />

(see table 2.3). Put differently, had infant mortality<br />

remained at its 1973 level in 1995, nearly<br />

40,000 more American babies would have died<br />

before their flISt birthday.<br />

• Although infant mortality declined among<br />

White, Black, and Hispanic infants in 1995, a<br />

disproportionate number ofBlack babies died.<br />

In 1995 the mortality rate for Black infants was<br />

15.1 per 1,000 live births-more than twice that<br />

for Whites (6.3 per 1,000 live births). Hispanics<br />

had an even lower rate (6.1 per 1,000 live<br />

births), although the r,ates for different groups<br />

ofHispanics vary widely.<br />

• In 1995, 81.3 percent of babies were born to<br />

mothers who received early prenatal <strong>care</strong>, up<br />

from 80.2 percent in 1994.<br />

Good news is also emerging in the battle<br />

against <strong>child</strong>hood AIDS. Between 1992 and 1996<br />

CHI LOR E 'S 0 E FEN S E FUN 0 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!