child care - Digital Library Collections

child care - Digital Library Collections child care - Digital Library Collections

diglib.lib.utk.edu
from diglib.lib.utk.edu More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

THE STATE OF AMERICA'S CHILDREN YEARBOOK 1998 Table 2.2 Child Health Coverage: Best and Worst States· Ten best states Ten worst states Rank State Percentage of children uninsured Rank State Percentage of children uninsured 1 Wisconsin 6.4% 51 Texas 24.1% 2 Hawaii 6.7 50 New Mexico 22.9 3 Vermont 7.0 49 Arizona 22.4 4 Minnesota 7.1 48 Oklahoma 20.8 5 North Dakota 7.9 47 Louisiana 20.3 6 Michigan 8.1 46 Arkansas 19.3 7 South Dakota 8.5 45 Nevada 19.1 8 Pennsylvania 9.3 44 California 18.7 8 Massachusetts 9.3 43 Mississippi 18.6 10 Nebraska 9.4 42 Florida 17.5 'Including the District of Columbia. Source: U.S. Deportment of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, March Current Population Surveys for 1994-96. Calculations by Children's Defense Fund. for children with family income up to 185 percent of the federal poverty level, corroborates these fmdings. The Florida report states that when parents got help in buying coverage for uninsured children, more children received health care in doctors' offices and fewer were treated in hospital emergency rooms. According to the report, children's emergency room visits dropped by 70 percent in the areas served by the program, saving state taxpayers and consumers $13 million in 1996. CHIP: A Landmark Federal-State Partnership for Child Health Temendous help for uninsured children came in 1997 with enactment of the new State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) as part ofthe Balanced Budget Act. A core ofcongressionalleaders, including Senators Kennedy, Hatch, Chafee, and Rockefeller and Representatives Johnson, Matsui, and Dingell, championed the program. The campaign for Child Health Now, a broad-based coalition of more than 250 organizations, garnered support for the measure, and it passed with strong bipartisan backing. On August 5, 1997, President Clinton signed the bill into law, approving the largest funding increase for children's health insurance coverage since the original enactment of Medicaid in 1965. CHIP represents one of the most significant developments for children's health in decades. Effective October I, 1997, it provides $48 billion over 10 years for children's health coverage. The program includes targeted Medicaid expansions and state grants of roughly $4 billion annually to cover uninsured children with family income above current Medicaid eligibility levels but too low to afford private health insurance. As many as 5 million uninsured children could benefit, depending on how states implement the new program. States need to move quickly so that children receive necessary health care as soon as possible (see box 2.1). 26 CHI L D R EN'S D E FEN S E FUN D

CHILD HEALTH Box 2.1 A State Advocate's Checklist for l..pl....ntln. CHIP New federal funds for children's health coverage create an extraordinary opportunity for advocates and policy makers at the state level to give millions of uninsured children a healthy start in life. The new CHIP program leaves most critical decisions in the hands of states. For the initiative to achieve its promise, advocates in all 50 states must wage vigorous campaigns supporting the best possible health coverage for as many uninsured children as possible. Advocates should urge state and community decision makers to: tJ' tJ' tJ' tJ' tJ' Give the federal government a state plan well in advance of July 1, 1998. Plans must be approved by October 1, and the approval process could take months. States that fail to submit their proposals in time may have to turn over their 1998 federal grants to other states. The funds are available now; states should move quickly to serve children without delay. Use the existing Medicaid (EPSDT) program, which was developed for children, rather than create a largely duplicative new program that may not meet children's needs. Medicaid provides the benefits children need. And using this existing program, rather than creating a new program with a separate bureaucracy, means more money for children's health care and less for administrative costs. Cover as many uninsured children as possible. At a minimum, states should cover children with family income up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($26,660 for a family of three in 1997), because their parents are least able to afford private insurance that covers the entire family. Ensure that fears of employers dropping coverage are not used as an excuse to leave children uninsured. In states that have adopted generous public programs to cover uninsured children, officials report no resulting change in employer-sponsored family health coverage. Companies cut dependent benefits to save labor costs, whether the state does a lot or a little for uninsured children. Use a family·friendly application process that cuts red tape. Let families apply either by mail, at public and community health providers and organizations, or at the welfare office. Develop a simple one- or two-page application form that is easy for parents and community agencies to use and requires a minimum ofsupporting paperwork from parents. States using separate state programs instead of Medicaid should take the following steps: tJ' tJ' Keep costs affordable for low-wage, working parents. According to CDF's analysis ofCensus Bureau data, the average family income ofan uninsured child is $20,800 a year. For families at this income level, even a small payment for health insurance comes directly out of the family budget for other essentials, such as food and utilities. Minnesota thus limits premiums to $4 a month for low-income children. When states have asked low-wage, working parents to pay more, many children have remained without health care. Provide comprehensive benefits for children. Model benefits after Medicaid. Cover preven· tive care, including immunizations and well-ehild care through age 18. Tailor coverage to CHI L D R EN'S D E FEN S E FUN D 27

CHILD<br />

HEALTH<br />

Box 2.1<br />

A State Advocate's Checklist for l..pl....ntln. CHIP<br />

New federal funds for <strong>child</strong>ren's health coverage create an extraordinary opportunity for<br />

advocates and policy makers at the state level to give millions of uninsured <strong>child</strong>ren a<br />

healthy start in life. The new CHIP program leaves most critical decisions in the hands of<br />

states. For the initiative to achieve its promise, advocates in all 50 states must wage vigorous<br />

campaigns supporting the best possible health coverage for as many uninsured <strong>child</strong>ren as<br />

possible. Advocates should urge state and community decision makers to:<br />

tJ'<br />

tJ'<br />

tJ'<br />

tJ'<br />

tJ'<br />

Give the federal government a state plan well in advance of July 1, 1998. Plans must be<br />

approved by October 1, and the approval process could take months. States that fail to<br />

submit their proposals in time may have to turn over their 1998 federal grants to other<br />

states. The funds are available now; states should move quickly to serve <strong>child</strong>ren without<br />

delay.<br />

Use the existing Medicaid (EPSDT) program, which was developed for <strong>child</strong>ren, rather than<br />

create a largely duplicative new program that may not meet <strong>child</strong>ren's needs. Medicaid<br />

provides the benefits <strong>child</strong>ren need. And using this existing program, rather than creating a<br />

new program with a separate bureaucracy, means more money for <strong>child</strong>ren's health <strong>care</strong><br />

and less for administrative costs.<br />

Cover as many uninsured <strong>child</strong>ren as possible. At a minimum, states should cover <strong>child</strong>ren<br />

with family income up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($26,660 for a family of<br />

three in 1997), because their parents are least able to afford private insurance that covers<br />

the entire family.<br />

Ensure that fears of employers dropping coverage are not used as an excuse to leave <strong>child</strong>ren<br />

uninsured. In states that have adopted generous public programs to cover uninsured<br />

<strong>child</strong>ren, officials report no resulting change in employer-sponsored family health coverage.<br />

Companies cut dependent benefits to save labor costs, whether the state does a lot or a little<br />

for uninsured <strong>child</strong>ren.<br />

Use a family·friendly application process that cuts red tape. Let families apply either by mail,<br />

at public and community health providers and organizations, or at the welfare office.<br />

Develop a simple one- or two-page application form that is easy for parents and community<br />

agencies to use and requires a minimum ofsupporting paperwork from parents.<br />

States using separate state programs instead of Medicaid should take the following steps:<br />

tJ'<br />

tJ'<br />

Keep costs affordable for low-wage, working parents. According to CDF's analysis ofCensus<br />

Bureau data, the average family income ofan uninsured <strong>child</strong> is $20,800 a year. For families<br />

at this income level, even a small payment for health insurance comes directly out of the<br />

family budget for other essentials, such as food and utilities. Minnesota thus limits premiums<br />

to $4 a month for low-income <strong>child</strong>ren. When states have asked low-wage, working<br />

parents to pay more, many <strong>child</strong>ren have remained without health <strong>care</strong>.<br />

Provide comprehensive benefits for <strong>child</strong>ren. Model benefits after Medicaid. Cover preven·<br />

tive <strong>care</strong>, including immunizations and well-ehild <strong>care</strong> through age 18. Tailor coverage to<br />

CHI L D R EN'S D E FEN S E FUN D 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!