child care - Digital Library Collections

child care - Digital Library Collections child care - Digital Library Collections

diglib.lib.utk.edu
from diglib.lib.utk.edu More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

THE STATE OF AMERICA'S CHILDREN YEARBOOK 1998 gained $29,533 each. We have five times more billionaires but 4 rnilHon more poor children. While millions of stock options helped quintuple the earnings ofcorporate CEOs between 1980 and 1995, those same employers threw millions of children out of health insurance plans at their parents' workplaces, and parental wages stagnated. More than II million children are uninsured, 90 percent of whom have working parents. More parents worked longer hours and more families sent a second or only parent into the labor force to meet family necessities. But for millions offamilies, work did not pay a family-supporting wage, and a minimum wage no longer prevents poverty. Sixtynine percent of poor children live in working families. Ending welfare as we know it will not help them. Ending poverty as we know it will. Sustained economic investment in rebuilding our communities and in stable jobs with decent wages, quality affordable child care, and health insurance must become top American priorities. Six years of economic expansion with low inflation and a soaring stock market have not mtered down to 36.5 million poor people, including 14.5 million children. In 1996 the number of very poor people who Hve below half the poverty Une (a mere $8,018 for a family of four) increased, while the current income of households in the top 5 percent increased by $12,500. Today more than one in five children is growing up poor and one in II is growing up extremely poor. This is shameful and unnecessary. Ifwe are truly concerned about preventing welfare, teen pregnancy, youth violence, school dropouts, and crime, then we need to start rust by preventing child poverty and ensuring every child a fair start in life. The moral, human, and economic costs of permitting 14.5 million children to be poor are too high. • A baby born poor is less likely to survive to its first birthday than a baby born to an unwed mother, a high school dropout, or a mother who smoked during pregnancy. • Poverty is a greater risk to children's overall health status than is living in a single-parent family. • Poor children face greater risk of stunted growth, anemia, repeated years of schooUng, lower test scores, and less education, as well as lower wages and lower earnings in their adult years. • Poverty puts children at a greater risk offalling behind in school than does Hving in a singleparent home or being born to teenage parents. Dr. Laura D'Andrea Tyson, former chair of the President's Council of Economic Advisors, says, "Policies to reduce the poverty rate among children-which typically remains higher in the United States than in any other advanced industrial countries-must be a fundamental part of our efforts to build a healthy economy for the 21st century." Nobel laureate in economics Robert M. Solow ofthe Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology states, "In optimistic moments, I like to believe that most Americans would want to lift children out of poverty even ifit cost something. It is hard to blame little children for the problems that surround them now and will damage their future health, ability, and learning capacity. Doing nothing about it seems both immoral and unintelligent." All segments of society pay the costs of child poverty and would share the gains ifchild poverty were eliminated. America's labor force is projected to lose as much as $130 billion in future productive capacity for every year 14.5 million American children continue to live in poverty. These costs will spill over to employers and consumers, making it harder for businesses to expand technology, train workers, or produce a full range of high-quality products. Additional costs will be borne by schools, hospitals, and taxpayers and by our criminal justice system. Poor children held back in school require special education and tutoring, experience a lifetime ofheightened medical problems and reliance on social service, and fail to earn and contribute as much in taxes.* When legitimate avenues of employment are closed, poor youths and adults turn to illegitimate ones, especially the lethal underground economy of drugs and crime fueled by out-of-eontrol gun trafficking. Since 1970 America's prison population has increased more than fivefold at an annual taxpayer tab exceeding $20 billion. Almost one in *These and other findings are detailed in a CDF report by Arlne Sherman. Poverty Matters: The Cost oj Child Poverty in America. xii CHI L D R E 'S D E FEN S E FUN D

INTRODUCTION three young Black and one in 15 young White males between ages 20 to 29 are under some type of correctional control (incarceration, probation, or parole). Two-thirds of state prison inmates in 1991 had not completed high school and one-third had annual incomes under $5,000. Joseph Califano, head ofColumbia University's National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, reports that if present trends persist, one of every 20 Americans born in 1997 will spend some time in jail, including one ofevery 11 men and one ofevery four Black men. Is this America's dream for its children and itself? Can an $8.7 trillion American economy not afford decent jobs, quality child care, education, and health care for all its children? What Kind of Ancestors Will We Be? What Is America's Legacy? longing for a sense of purpose things cannot meet-with spiritual anchors and worthwhile goals? Will our children have something besides drugs and booze and cigarettes and rollicking good times to turn to when life's rough seas batter their souls? How will they remember us as parents and leaders? Will they remember the jets, second man- sions, and multiple nannies, or will they remember how often we watched their games and plays and concerts and were home to soothe over a bad nightmare? Will their memory books be chock-full of expensive toys and designer clothes, or of regular mealtimes, shared conversation, family games, prayer, and worship? Are they able to get our atten- tion in the small daily ways that matter and say I It is time for every American to see and excise the moral tumors ofchild neglect, violence, poverty, and racism eating away the core of our national soul. What kind ofbillboard are we for democracy or capitalism-in a world where more than 3 billion people live on less than $2 per day and 200 million children suffer malnutrition every year-when millions of American children are hungry, homeless, neglected, abused, and dying from diseases we have the moneyand power butnotthedecencyto prevent? How will we lead a world where 5 of 6 billion citizens are not White, when young Black and Latino males see no jobs, hope, or future choices beyond prison and death? How do we fill our privileged children-who, like many poor children, are Figure 1 Comparison of Poor and Nonpoor Children Infant deaths per 1,000 live births Percentage of live births: Premature (under 37 weeks) Low birthweight • Poor • Nonpoor Poor compared with nonpoor 1.6 times more likely 1.8 times more likely 1.9 times more likely Inadequate prenatal core 43.1% 2.8 times more likely Percentage of students in grades 3-12: Have repeated a grade Have been expelled • 3.4% fl·o% Percentage of high school sophomores: Atlended a two- or four-year college Earned a bachelor's degree 69.6% 2.0 times more likely 3.4 times more likely One-third less likely One-half as likely Source: Arloc Sherman, Poverty Matters: The Cost of Child Poverty in America (CDF, 1997), p. 3. CHI LOR EN' S 0 E FEN S E FUN 0 xiii

THE STATE OF AMERICA'S CHILDREN YEARBOOK 1998<br />

gained $29,533 each. We have five times more<br />

billionaires but 4 rnilHon more poor <strong>child</strong>ren.<br />

While millions of stock options helped quintuple<br />

the earnings ofcorporate CEOs between 1980 and<br />

1995, those same employers threw millions of <strong>child</strong>ren<br />

out of health insurance plans at their parents'<br />

workplaces, and parental wages stagnated.<br />

More than II million <strong>child</strong>ren are uninsured,<br />

90 percent of whom have working parents. More<br />

parents worked longer hours and more families<br />

sent a second or only parent into the labor force to<br />

meet family necessities. But for millions offamilies,<br />

work did not pay a family-supporting wage, and a<br />

minimum wage no longer prevents poverty. Sixtynine<br />

percent of poor <strong>child</strong>ren live in working families.<br />

Ending welfare as we know it will not help<br />

them. Ending poverty as we know it will. Sustained<br />

economic investment in rebuilding our communities<br />

and in stable jobs with decent wages, quality<br />

affordable <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, and health insurance must<br />

become top American priorities.<br />

Six years of economic expansion with low inflation<br />

and a soaring stock market have not mtered<br />

down to 36.5 million poor people, including 14.5<br />

million <strong>child</strong>ren. In 1996 the number of very poor<br />

people who Hve below half the poverty Une (a mere<br />

$8,018 for a family of four) increased, while the<br />

current income of households in the top 5 percent<br />

increased by $12,500. Today more than one in five<br />

<strong>child</strong>ren is growing up poor and one in II is growing<br />

up extremely poor. This is shameful and unnecessary.<br />

Ifwe are truly concerned about preventing welfare,<br />

teen pregnancy, youth violence, school dropouts,<br />

and crime, then we need to start rust by<br />

preventing <strong>child</strong> poverty and ensuring every <strong>child</strong> a<br />

fair start in life. The moral, human, and economic<br />

costs of permitting 14.5 million <strong>child</strong>ren to be poor<br />

are too high.<br />

• A baby born poor is less likely to survive to its<br />

first birthday than a baby born to an unwed<br />

mother, a high school dropout, or a mother<br />

who smoked during pregnancy.<br />

• Poverty is a greater risk to <strong>child</strong>ren's overall<br />

health status than is living in a single-parent<br />

family.<br />

• Poor <strong>child</strong>ren face greater risk of stunted<br />

growth, anemia, repeated years of schooUng,<br />

lower test scores, and less education, as well as<br />

lower wages and lower earnings in their adult<br />

years.<br />

• Poverty puts <strong>child</strong>ren at a greater risk offalling<br />

behind in school than does Hving in a singleparent<br />

home or being born to teenage parents.<br />

Dr. Laura D'Andrea Tyson, former chair of the<br />

President's Council of Economic Advisors, says,<br />

"Policies to reduce the poverty rate among<br />

<strong>child</strong>ren-which typically remains higher in the<br />

United States than in any other advanced industrial<br />

countries-must be a fundamental part of our efforts<br />

to build a healthy economy for the 21st century."<br />

Nobel laureate in economics Robert M.<br />

Solow ofthe Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology<br />

states, "In optimistic moments, I like to believe that<br />

most Americans would want to lift <strong>child</strong>ren out of<br />

poverty even ifit cost something. It is hard to blame<br />

little <strong>child</strong>ren for the problems that surround them<br />

now and will damage their future health, ability, and<br />

learning capacity. Doing nothing about it seems<br />

both immoral and unintelligent."<br />

All segments of society pay the costs of <strong>child</strong><br />

poverty and would share the gains if<strong>child</strong> poverty<br />

were eliminated. America's labor force is projected<br />

to lose as much as $130 billion in future productive<br />

capacity for every year 14.5 million American <strong>child</strong>ren<br />

continue to live in poverty. These costs will<br />

spill over to employers and consumers, making it<br />

harder for businesses to expand technology, train<br />

workers, or produce a full range of high-quality<br />

products. Additional costs will be borne by<br />

schools, hospitals, and taxpayers and by our criminal<br />

justice system. Poor <strong>child</strong>ren held back in<br />

school require special education and tutoring, experience<br />

a lifetime ofheightened medical problems<br />

and reliance on social service, and fail to earn and<br />

contribute as much in taxes.*<br />

When legitimate avenues of employment are<br />

closed, poor youths and adults turn to illegitimate<br />

ones, especially the lethal underground economy<br />

of drugs and crime fueled by out-of-eontrol gun<br />

trafficking. Since 1970 America's prison population<br />

has increased more than fivefold at an annual<br />

taxpayer tab exceeding $20 billion. Almost one in<br />

*These and other findings are detailed in a CDF report by Arlne Sherman. Poverty Matters: The Cost oj Child Poverty in America.<br />

xii CHI L D R E 'S D E FEN S E FUN D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!