ECB Anti-Doping Rules 2013 - Ecb - England and Wales Cricket ...

the National Cricket Federation; and
12.2.3 any further offences shall result in a £1000 fine for the First Class
County by the National Cricket Federation.
12.3 Any First Class County whose squad is unavailable for sample collection due to the
provision of inaccurate squad whereabouts information will be sanctioned as follows:
12.3.1 for a first offence, the First Class County shall be given a formal
written warning from National Cricket Federation and shall be liable
for any costs incurred by the National Cricket Federation as a result
of the squad being unavailable; and
12.3.2 for any subsequent offence during the same season, the First Class
County shall be fined £1000 and the First Class County shall be
liable for any costs incurred by National Cricket Federation as a
result of the squad being unavailable.
12.4 The obligations on First Class Counties under this Article 12 in no way diminish,
remove or otherwise affect the obligations on Cricketers in any International
Registered Testing Pool (or any other testing pool as may be appropriate), under
these Rules, the ICC Code, the World Anti-Doping Code or otherwise, to provide
whereabouts information.
12.5 Cricketers shall not be guilty of a Missed Test or Filing Failure as a result of incorrect
information provided by, or any failure to provide information on the part of, the First
Class County under this Article 12.
ARTICLE 13 APPEALS
13.1 Decisions Subject to Appeal
Decisions made under the Rules may be challenged solely by appeal as set out in this
Article 13 (or as otherwise provided in the Rules). Such decisions shall remain in effect
while under appeal unless the appellate body orders otherwise.
13.2 Appeals from Decisions Regarding Anti-Doping Rule Violations,
Consequences, and Provisional Suspensions
13.2.1 The following decisions -- a decision that an anti-doping rule violation was (or
was not) committed, a decision imposing Consequences (or not imposing
Consequences) for an anti-doping rule violation; a decision that a charge
cannot go forward for procedural reasons (including, for example, because
too much time has passed); a decision that the National Cricket Federation or
a hearing panel lacks jurisdiction to deal with an alleged anti-doping rule
violation; a decision not to pursue an Adverse Analytical Finding or an
Atypical Finding as an anti-doping rule violation under Article 7.2 or 7.3; a
decision not to bring a charge after an investigation under Article 7.5; a
decision to suspend a period of Ineligibility in accordance with Article 10.5.3;
a decision to reinstate a suspended period of Ineligibility in accordance with
Article 10.5.3; a decision under Article 10.10.2 in relation to participation
whilst Ineligible; and a decision to reduce a period of Ineligibility imposed
under a predecessor version of the Rules in accordance with Article 18.5.3 --
may be appealed by any of the following parties exclusively as provided in
this Article 13:
13.2.1.1 the Cricketer or Cricketer Support Personnel who is the subject of
the decision being appealed;
37
- 36 -