24.11.2014 Views

ECB Anti-Doping Rules 2013 - Ecb - England and Wales Cricket ...

ECB Anti-Doping Rules 2013 - Ecb - England and Wales Cricket ...

ECB Anti-Doping Rules 2013 - Ecb - England and Wales Cricket ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

een committed, the National <strong>Cricket</strong> Federation shall refer the matter to the<br />

Review Board, to determine whether there is a case to answer.<br />

7.5.6 If the Review Board determines that the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er Support<br />

Personnel has a case to answer under Article 2, the <strong>Anti</strong>-<strong>Doping</strong> Manager<br />

shall promptly send the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er Support Personnel a written<br />

Notice of Charge (copied to WADA, the ICC <strong>and</strong> his/her National <strong>Anti</strong>-<strong>Doping</strong><br />

Organisation), amended as appropriate to confirm the following:<br />

7.5.6.1 that the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er Support Personnel has a case to<br />

answer under Article 2 (specifying which particular anti-doping rule<br />

violation is alleged to have been committed);<br />

7.5.6.2 details of facts upon which the case to answer is based, including<br />

copies of any relevant documentation;<br />

7.5.6.3 (where applicable) the matters relating to Provisional Suspension<br />

specified at Article 7.6; <strong>and</strong><br />

7.5.6.4 the matters specified at Article 7.7.<br />

7.6 Provisional Suspension<br />

7.6.1 If analysis of a <strong>Cricket</strong>er’s A Sample results in an Adverse Analytical Finding<br />

for a Prohibited Substance that is not a Specified Substance, <strong>and</strong> a review in<br />

accordance with Article 7.1.2 does not reveal an applicable TUE or departure<br />

from the International St<strong>and</strong>ard for Testing or the International St<strong>and</strong>ard for<br />

Laboratories that caused the Adverse Analytical Finding, then the National<br />

<strong>Cricket</strong> Federation shall Provisionally Suspend the <strong>Cricket</strong>er pending the<br />

<strong>Anti</strong>-<strong>Doping</strong> Tribunal’s determination of whether he/she has committed an<br />

anti-doping rule violation.<br />

7.6.2 In any case not covered by Article 7.6.1 (for example, if the analysis of an A<br />

Sample has resulted in an Adverse Analytical Finding for a Prohibited<br />

Substance that is a Specified Substance), where the National <strong>Cricket</strong><br />

Federation decides to take the matter forward as an apparent anti-doping rule<br />

violation in accordance with the provisions of this Article 7, the National<br />

<strong>Cricket</strong> Federation may Provisionally Suspend the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er<br />

Support Personnel pending the <strong>Anti</strong>-<strong>Doping</strong> Tribunal’s determination of<br />

whether he/she has committed an anti-doping rule violation.<br />

7.6.3 Where a Provisional Suspension is imposed, whether pursuant to Article<br />

7.6.1 or Article 7.6.2, the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er Support Personnel shall be<br />

given either: (a) an opportunity for a Provisional Hearing before imposition of<br />

the Provisional Suspension or on a timely basis after imposition of the<br />

Provisional Suspension; or (b) an opportunity for an expedited hearing in<br />

accordance with Article 8 on a timely basis after imposition of a Provisional<br />

Suspension. Where the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er Support Personnel is given an<br />

opportunity to challenge the imposition of a Provisional Suspension at a<br />

Provisional Hearing, the only grounds of challenge (which it shall be his/her<br />

burden to establish) shall be the following:<br />

7.6.3.1 the charge(s) has/have no reasonable prospect of being upheld,<br />

e.g., because of a patent flaw in the case against him/her; or<br />

7.6.3.2 the <strong>Cricket</strong>er or <strong>Cricket</strong>er Support Personnel has a strong arguable<br />

case that he/she bears No Fault or Negligence for the anti-doping<br />

rule violation(s) charged, so that any period of Ineligibility that might<br />

otherwise be imposed for such a violation is likely to be completely<br />

eliminated by application of Article 10.5.1; or<br />

23<br />

- 22 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!