24.11.2014 Views

Elektronika 2009-11.pdf - Instytut Systemów Elektronicznych

Elektronika 2009-11.pdf - Instytut Systemów Elektronicznych

Elektronika 2009-11.pdf - Instytut Systemów Elektronicznych

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Both models are created of the basis of data received<br />

from the group of people or a group of technical measurement<br />

machines for classification. Classifiers can be a form of<br />

2 people, 3 people … a group of people or the population of<br />

a whole country etc. On the basis of empirical or declared results<br />

we receive average individual model of group from<br />

which the data was taken or average individual model of the<br />

person of the group [5].<br />

Group model is usually used when we do not know from<br />

whom exactly the linguistic information is received. We only<br />

know that the information comes from of the group (population)<br />

which the person belongs to. The model represents the<br />

whole group of people (the whole population). Whereas the<br />

average individual model of a person of group represents only<br />

the average person of the group (population), it does not represent<br />

the whole group of people (the whole population).<br />

Average individual probability<br />

classification functions from the group<br />

of people (population)<br />

In the group of people classification function of particular<br />

members are usually a bit different. For example in the group<br />

of 3 people each of them can differently understand the concept<br />

“medium” (Fig. 1).<br />

The question arises, what does the average individual classification<br />

function of one typical person of the group look like,<br />

in other words the most frequently found person in the group?<br />

Classification function of such person are most similar to<br />

the function of the majority of people in the examined population.<br />

Similarly the height of majority of people in a population<br />

is usually close to medium height. It means classification function<br />

of the majority people in the population are most similar<br />

to the function of the average person in the group.<br />

In the example presented in Fig. 1 the average individual<br />

classification function is drown in thick line.<br />

Average individual classification probability function answers<br />

the question: what is the probability the average (most<br />

frequently found) person in the group qualifies numerical value<br />

to the given linguistic concept.<br />

The different between the group classification function of<br />

linguistic concept and the average individual classification<br />

function is that the group function expresses the average value<br />

of classification probability by the whole group and the average<br />

individual classification function expresses the average classification<br />

probability by the average person from the group.<br />

Next the method of the identification of the average individual<br />

classification function to linguistic quantifiers is presented.<br />

In this methods the support of the linguistic concept are divided<br />

to the equal number of interval, then the integral of the<br />

function on every of support interval is computed (area on the<br />

interval limited by classification function and axis x). Next the<br />

average area for i-th interval of n linguistic concept is computed.<br />

where: n - the number of individual linguistics concept, f k (x) -<br />

classification function of individual linguistic concept, e.g.<br />

“small probability”.<br />

Average individual classification probability function will be<br />

created from average support intervals and the average area<br />

in the particular interval. The support and the area of the average<br />

individual classification probability function will be the<br />

mean of individual classification function. In the last stage having<br />

computed all the average quantifiers included in the dictionary<br />

of classification probability function we normalized<br />

them, so that the sum of all quantifiers is one. In many cases<br />

the normalization does not change anything because the sum<br />

of quantifiers is already one.<br />

Example 1. In the below example we will look into two<br />

quantifiers of classification function. For better understanding<br />

of the method the quantifiers are in the form of step function,<br />

Fig. 2. On the basis of the given quantifiers the average<br />

individual quantifier of classification function will be determined,<br />

using (1).<br />

The points of the support F_aver are the average points<br />

which divide the supports F1 and F2 (dotted line):<br />

The surface area of rectangles which create the function<br />

F_aver are the average surface area marked with doted line<br />

rectangles in F1 and F2, respectively, thus the heights of the<br />

rectangles are:<br />

(1)<br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

Fig. 1. The illustration of the sense of average individual classification<br />

probability function (thick line)<br />

Rys. 1. Ilustracja przeciętnej indywidualnej funkcji klasyfikacji<br />

(linia pogrubiona)<br />

Fig. 3, 4 and 5 presents application of method of determining<br />

the average individual probability classification function using<br />

individual probability classification function received on the<br />

basis of the experiment which was carried out by the authors.<br />

Individual classification function show the models of individual<br />

people taking part of the experiment.<br />

ELEKTRONIKA 11/<strong>2009</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!