Military Embedded Systems Spring 2005 Volume 1 Number 1
Military Embedded Systems Spring 2005 Volume 1 Number 1
Military Embedded Systems Spring 2005 Volume 1 Number 1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mil Tech Trends<br />
MILITARY EMBEDDED SYSTEMS Resource Guide<br />
FPGAs, serial fabrics, and UAVs:<br />
The ones to watch<br />
Q & A with Peter Cavill, CEO,<br />
Radstone <strong>Embedded</strong> Computing<br />
EDITOR’S FOREWORD<br />
Radstone is one of the oldest companies serving the COTS market. Founded as a spin-off from Plessey Microsystems,<br />
Radstone was in the COTS (Commercial Off-the-Shelf) market back when the Primes and Subs were still debating open standards<br />
and Non-Developmental Items (NDI). An instigator of the original VME specification and the IEEE 1101.2 conductioncooled<br />
specification, today Radstone is one of the big three vendors serving the harsh environment, deployed COTS market.<br />
We tossed our questions up to Peter Cavill, president of Radstone <strong>Embedded</strong> Computing – a man who is so technically savvy<br />
that he previously ran the company’s engineering group. – Ed.<br />
MIL EMBEDDED: Tell us briefly about<br />
your company’s focus as applied to the<br />
military.<br />
CAVILL: Radstone is 100 percent focused<br />
on the military – providing solutions to<br />
customers in the military marketplace<br />
is what we do. At the heart of our business<br />
is a commitment to developing long<br />
term partnerships with defense OEMs to<br />
provide them with the leading edge technology<br />
they need in either rugged or nonrugged<br />
environments. We believe we’re a<br />
world leader in the field of designing and<br />
developing rugged products, with a long<br />
pedigree in bringing to market solutions<br />
that have ruggedness designed in to them<br />
from the drawing board stage.<br />
Radstone was among the very first companies<br />
to embrace COTS as the way forward,<br />
with over 40 years of experience in<br />
designing systems specifically for military<br />
applications. We’re a key long-term<br />
supplier to high-profile programs such as<br />
the M1A2 Abrams tank, MLRS, ATFLIR,<br />
Firefinder, the Eurofighter Typhoon and<br />
the Mk48, and Mk54 torpedoes.<br />
We’re also very well aware that 100 percent<br />
standard products aren’t always what<br />
the customer really needs, so our business<br />
model is a highly flexible one that allows<br />
us to react to specific program requirements<br />
by developing custom versions of<br />
our products.<br />
MIL EMBEDDED: What are the top three<br />
embedded technologies you’re seeing in<br />
the market today?<br />
CAVILL: Multiprocessor systems are<br />
unquestionably one of the key embedded<br />
technologies and are enabling our customers<br />
to envisage applications that, only a<br />
short while ago, were all but unthinkable.<br />
Another technology that’s rightly capturing<br />
a good deal of attention is switched Gigabit<br />
Ethernet. There’s no doubt that communications<br />
technologies are assuming much<br />
greater importance in the defense programs<br />
of today. Ethernet is a highly proven and<br />
trustworthy technology.<br />
The third technology I’d nominate would<br />
be Software Defined Radio (SDR) and<br />
radar. We’re seeing huge interest in this<br />
area and the availability of increasingly<br />
sophisticated silicon – notably Field<br />
Programmable Grid Arrays (FPGAs) – is<br />
making SDR a real growth area for our<br />
business.<br />
MIL EMBEDDED: How is the increasing<br />
size, speed, and complexity of FPGAs<br />
and other programmable devices changing<br />
the nature of military systems?<br />
CAVILL: With the emphasis on networkcentric<br />
warfare, the military is looking to<br />
acquire and process far more information,<br />
of all types, than it has ever done before.<br />
That leads to the need for incredibly powerful<br />
data acquisition capabilities and no<br />
less powerful signal processing systems.<br />
For us, that’s where FPGA fits in as an<br />
enabling technology for this new generation<br />
of solutions. In data acquisition, for<br />
example, the closer you can put processing<br />
power to the capture point, at the front<br />
end of the application straight off the sensor<br />
– the antenna, for example – the more<br />
data you can capture.<br />
Powerful FPGAs, in conjunction with<br />
powerful converters, enable you to do<br />
that and, of course, because the algorithm<br />
is executed in hardware rather than<br />
software, you can get incredible performance.<br />
Similarly at the back end of the<br />
application FPGAs can deliver enormous<br />
amounts of processing power. The SDR<br />
systems that ICS [a Radstone subsidiary]<br />
develops use FPGAs for precisely these<br />
reasons.<br />
MIL EMBEDDED: There’s been a great<br />
deal of industry consolidation over<br />
the past several years, both within the<br />
Primes/Subs, and within the embedded<br />
vendor base. What effects will this have<br />
on the military customer?<br />
CAVILL: The consolidation in the industry<br />
is a mixture of good news and bad news<br />
for military customers. The bad news is<br />
that consolidation inevitably results in a<br />
reduction in the number of potential suppliers,<br />
and thus a reduction in competition<br />
– and that can never be good for any<br />
customer looking to maximize his leverage<br />
and his spending power. On the other<br />
hand, consolidation into fewer, larger<br />
suppliers is likely to reduce volatility in<br />
the supplier base – although there may be<br />
short term pain as product lines are rationalized.<br />
Larger companies tend to be in<br />
business for longer than small ones, and<br />
that reassurance has always been valued<br />
by military customers.<br />
46 / <strong>2005</strong> MILITARY EMBEDDED SYSTEMS Resource Guide