23.11.2014 Views

A Journal of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya

A Journal of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya

A Journal of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> hatred towards the old and terminally<br />

ill Selma, but Selma is full <strong>of</strong> love for<br />

Yoke and wants from the core <strong>of</strong> her<br />

heart to remove the fear <strong>of</strong> death from<br />

Yoke’s mind: “How one could live with<br />

absolute outside fear?’’ In addition, Yoke<br />

imagines arrival <strong>of</strong> the ‘satan’ in lieu <strong>of</strong><br />

Saint Nicholas while Selma, forgetting the<br />

nearing death, awakes and sings to celebrate<br />

Christmas but becomes sad when her cry<br />

during singing is recognized. Interestingly,<br />

Selma asks Yoke as to why the latter always<br />

concentrates on death. When Selma sings<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> the god-child, Yoke<br />

feels appearance <strong>of</strong> death. Undoubtedly<br />

this is a symptom <strong>of</strong> existential psychology.<br />

Selma’s following words are quite<br />

perceptive. ‘‘You think yourself free, that<br />

is the root <strong>of</strong> all difficulties. Neither we<br />

are alone, nor free. Rather we are not<br />

alone and can’t be alone, so are not free...<br />

and therefore the right to choose or decide<br />

is not ours...Imaginations <strong>of</strong> all such<br />

freedoms are mere ego...’’ These are<br />

existential issues. One day Selma expresses<br />

her desire to marry Yan and executes<br />

a will for all her property in his name.<br />

To Selma, other’s presence itself is like<br />

God’s presence. Finally, Yoke accepts her<br />

defeat and wants to commit suicide by<br />

addressing this world as bastard. Thus<br />

there are two perspectives about death—<br />

are these two perspectives Indian and<br />

European in essence? Chandrakant<br />

Bandivadekar considers such categorization<br />

as simplification. However, there is no<br />

doubt that this novel is existential<br />

individualistic and more artistic than real.<br />

Thus in these three novels Agyeya<br />

has opposed Marxist classist view <strong>of</strong> reality.<br />

Though he averred that a writer may get<br />

inspiration from even small things or events<br />

but in practice he made the range and<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> elites as the final theme<br />

<strong>of</strong> his writings. He did not see the labour<br />

class as revolutionary, hence his<br />

perspective to social reality differs from<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Marx and <strong>Gandhi</strong> who provided<br />

a central place to the common man. All<br />

these novels have preference for individual<br />

characters to social system. That is, there<br />

is less sociality in these novels, though<br />

these are full <strong>of</strong> artistry, poetics and<br />

literariness. On the other hand, in Nagarjun’s<br />

novels, especially in ‘Balchanma’, there<br />

is more sociality than artistry, poetics<br />

and literariness and as such he is more<br />

realistic than Agyeya. The famous<br />

sociologist C. Wright Mills talks <strong>of</strong><br />

‘sociological imagination’ with three aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> life : biography, history and society—<br />

and these have dialectical and dynamic<br />

relationship with one another. But<br />

unfortunately in these novels <strong>of</strong> Agyeya<br />

there is only expressive biography; actually<br />

history and society are missing. At the<br />

most there is a concern for inter-personal<br />

relationships among some characters but<br />

society is much more than the sum total<br />

<strong>of</strong> individuals. The process <strong>of</strong> socialisation<br />

starts in the family since one’s birth and<br />

ends only with the death through various<br />

norms and values. That is why C. Wright<br />

Mills rightly observes that ‘private troubles’<br />

<strong>of</strong> individuals are not <strong>of</strong> much concern,<br />

rather only when private troubles become<br />

‘public issues’, these are the real collective<br />

concerns <strong>of</strong> the society, hence more<br />

60 :: January-March 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!