23.11.2014 Views

OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...

OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...

OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>OHIO</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> <strong>DENTAL</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />

<strong>BOARD</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> MINUTES<br />

OCTOBER 14, 2009 PAGE 7<br />

telling <strong>the</strong> Board members that <strong>the</strong> addiction has not been worth all <strong>the</strong> damage she has<br />

experienced.<br />

Dr. Armstrong indicated that Ms. Robinson has signed a consent agreement with <strong>the</strong><br />

Board that <strong>the</strong>y will be reviewing for consideration later in <strong>the</strong> meeting.<br />

REVIEW OF PROPOSED MOTIONS<br />

Motion by Dr. Kyger, second by Ms. Staley, to rescind <strong>the</strong> proposed notice of<br />

opportunity for hearing for Jane Dodson, D.D.S., license number 30-017095, case<br />

numbers 06-18-0690 and 07-18-0497.<br />

Motion carried.<br />

REVIEW OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT(S)<br />

The Board reviewed five (5) proposed consent agreements. The names of <strong>the</strong><br />

individuals/licensees were not included in <strong>the</strong> documents reviewed by <strong>the</strong> Board. The<br />

names of <strong>the</strong> individuals/licensees have been added to <strong>the</strong> minutes for public notice<br />

purposes.<br />

NON-DISCIPLINARY<br />

Ms. Reitz explained that <strong>the</strong> first document for review had been included with <strong>the</strong><br />

consent agreements but that it was a bit different in nature. She stated that <strong>the</strong><br />

document was an attestation from a dentist who wants to agree to not physically practice<br />

clinical dentistry and has not actively practiced dentistry since 2006. She stated that he<br />

would like to keep his license only in a supervisory capacity for administrative functions<br />

to keep his practice.<br />

Ms. Carson fur<strong>the</strong>r clarified that <strong>the</strong> dentist in question currently owns a dental<br />

practice, he does not work in <strong>the</strong> dental practice but wants to continue to manage or be<br />

<strong>the</strong> supervising dental manager of <strong>the</strong> office. She stated that his intention is to hire<br />

dentists to perform <strong>the</strong> clinical functions of <strong>the</strong> office while he remains in an<br />

administrative capacity.<br />

Upon questioning by <strong>the</strong> Board, Ms. Carson explained that <strong>the</strong> attestation is being<br />

offered due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> dentist is legally blind and <strong>the</strong>refore he is agreeing that<br />

he will not clinically practice. Dr. Howard explained that <strong>the</strong> dentist in question will not<br />

be directly supervising dental hygienists in his practice but ra<strong>the</strong>r he would be<br />

administrating <strong>the</strong> practice. Ms. Reitz fur<strong>the</strong>r explained that under <strong>Ohio</strong> law, <strong>the</strong> owner

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!