OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...
OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...
OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>OHIO</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> <strong>DENTAL</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> MINUTES<br />
OCTOBER 14, 2009 PAGE 7<br />
telling <strong>the</strong> Board members that <strong>the</strong> addiction has not been worth all <strong>the</strong> damage she has<br />
experienced.<br />
Dr. Armstrong indicated that Ms. Robinson has signed a consent agreement with <strong>the</strong><br />
Board that <strong>the</strong>y will be reviewing for consideration later in <strong>the</strong> meeting.<br />
REVIEW OF PROPOSED MOTIONS<br />
Motion by Dr. Kyger, second by Ms. Staley, to rescind <strong>the</strong> proposed notice of<br />
opportunity for hearing for Jane Dodson, D.D.S., license number 30-017095, case<br />
numbers 06-18-0690 and 07-18-0497.<br />
Motion carried.<br />
REVIEW OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT(S)<br />
The Board reviewed five (5) proposed consent agreements. The names of <strong>the</strong><br />
individuals/licensees were not included in <strong>the</strong> documents reviewed by <strong>the</strong> Board. The<br />
names of <strong>the</strong> individuals/licensees have been added to <strong>the</strong> minutes for public notice<br />
purposes.<br />
NON-DISCIPLINARY<br />
Ms. Reitz explained that <strong>the</strong> first document for review had been included with <strong>the</strong><br />
consent agreements but that it was a bit different in nature. She stated that <strong>the</strong><br />
document was an attestation from a dentist who wants to agree to not physically practice<br />
clinical dentistry and has not actively practiced dentistry since 2006. She stated that he<br />
would like to keep his license only in a supervisory capacity for administrative functions<br />
to keep his practice.<br />
Ms. Carson fur<strong>the</strong>r clarified that <strong>the</strong> dentist in question currently owns a dental<br />
practice, he does not work in <strong>the</strong> dental practice but wants to continue to manage or be<br />
<strong>the</strong> supervising dental manager of <strong>the</strong> office. She stated that his intention is to hire<br />
dentists to perform <strong>the</strong> clinical functions of <strong>the</strong> office while he remains in an<br />
administrative capacity.<br />
Upon questioning by <strong>the</strong> Board, Ms. Carson explained that <strong>the</strong> attestation is being<br />
offered due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> dentist is legally blind and <strong>the</strong>refore he is agreeing that<br />
he will not clinically practice. Dr. Howard explained that <strong>the</strong> dentist in question will not<br />
be directly supervising dental hygienists in his practice but ra<strong>the</strong>r he would be<br />
administrating <strong>the</strong> practice. Ms. Reitz fur<strong>the</strong>r explained that under <strong>Ohio</strong> law, <strong>the</strong> owner