OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...
OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...
OHIO STATE DENTAL BOARD BOARD MEETING - the Ohio State ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>OHIO</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> <strong>DENTAL</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> MINUTES<br />
OCTOBER 14, 2009 PAGE 28<br />
Dr. Kyger commented that <strong>the</strong> members just wanted Dr. Armstrong to testify from a<br />
unified position and just felt that <strong>the</strong> members were not <strong>the</strong>re yet. Dr. Armstrong stated<br />
that <strong>the</strong> previous vote indicated that <strong>the</strong>re was not a unified position.<br />
Dr. Wynn referenced an earlier discussion wherein it was her understanding that <strong>the</strong><br />
next time that <strong>the</strong> Board could provide testimony on this Bill would be at <strong>the</strong> Senate.<br />
However, she stated that it was her understanding that <strong>the</strong> House could change <strong>the</strong> Bill<br />
that we currently have and vote. Ms. Reitz stated that <strong>the</strong> situation Dr. Wynn was<br />
referring to was highly unlikely. However, she stated that, as with <strong>the</strong> first introduction<br />
with HB 215, <strong>the</strong> Bill was introduced and most if not all of <strong>the</strong> testimony had been<br />
heard within seven (7) days. Ms. Reitz indicated that difficulty arises when <strong>the</strong> Board<br />
does not have a position ready to testify and this could/would be a similar situation.<br />
Mr. Jones commented that ano<strong>the</strong>r downside to this situation is that without a Board<br />
position, <strong>the</strong> Board and its members cannot go forth and educate <strong>the</strong> Senators. Ms.<br />
Reitz concurred that was <strong>the</strong> same problem that <strong>the</strong> Board had initially with HB 215.<br />
Mr. Lawrence pointed out that <strong>the</strong>re was no position to discuss should o<strong>the</strong>r members of<br />
<strong>the</strong> House contact Board members in this regard.<br />
Discussion followed wherein it was decided that those Board members who could<br />
remain at <strong>the</strong> meeting would continue <strong>the</strong>ir discussions regarding SubHB 215 ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than schedule a special meeting of <strong>the</strong> Board on a future date.<br />
Dr. Armstrong called a ten (10) minute recess.<br />
The Board returned to open session at 4:30 p.m. Dr. Armstrong, Dr. Howard, Dr.<br />
Leffler, Ms. Staley, Dr. Kyger, Dr. Wynn, Dr. Kaye, Dr. Wallace, and Ms. Naber were in<br />
attendance.<br />
Noting that a quorum of <strong>the</strong> Board was in attendance, Dr. Armstrong continued <strong>the</strong><br />
discussion on <strong>the</strong> Board’s position of SubHB 215.<br />
Ka<strong>the</strong>rine Bockbrader, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, David Owsiany, J.D. and<br />
Keith Kerns, Esq., of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> Dental Association, and Joseph Yonadi, Enforcement<br />
Supervisor and Malynda K. Franks of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>State</strong> Dental Board were also in<br />
attendance.<br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> POSITION ON SUBHB 215<br />
BACKGROUND/MISSION OF THE <strong>BOARD</strong><br />
Dr. Armstrong began by stating that <strong>the</strong>y would be using <strong>the</strong> document of his<br />
testimony to <strong>the</strong> House Health Committee as a guideline and proceed through it item by