22.11.2014 Views

NORTH-SOUTH CENTRE - ETH - North-South Centre North-South ...

NORTH-SOUTH CENTRE - ETH - North-South Centre North-South ...

NORTH-SOUTH CENTRE - ETH - North-South Centre North-South ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The benefits<br />

After having discussed the various challenges of R4D, let<br />

us now focus on its benefits. What are the desired outputs<br />

of R4D?<br />

26<br />

FOCUS<br />

Research for development<br />

Urs Wiesmann<br />

Urs Wiesmann is a human geographer by profession. He is<br />

the Director of the <strong>Centre</strong> for Development and Environment<br />

of the University of Bern, and together with Hans Hurni, he<br />

heads the Swiss National <strong>Centre</strong> of Competence in Research<br />

<strong>North</strong>-<strong>South</strong> (NCCR <strong>North</strong>-<strong>South</strong>). His main areas of professional<br />

focus are sustainable regional development, natural resources<br />

management and global change particularly in developing and<br />

transition countries, as well as interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary<br />

methodology and its application in the context of<br />

development and environment. Urs Wiesmann has conducted<br />

research in the Swiss Alps, in Africa (Kenya, Tanzania, Madagascar,<br />

Ethiopia, and Morocco), and in Asia (Kyrgyzstan, India,<br />

Laos, and Vietnam).<br />

The NCCR <strong>North</strong>-<strong>South</strong> is an innovative research programme<br />

in the fields of global change and sustainable development.<br />

Encompassing a network of over 400 researchers active in<br />

more than 40 countries worldwide, it is dedicated to finding<br />

sustainable, practicable solutions to specific challenges of<br />

global change.<br />

leaflets are now one of the indicators for evaluating<br />

researchers.<br />

Barbara Becker: It would be worthwhile to consider such an<br />

evaluation system for Swiss universities as well.<br />

Urs Wiesmann: I think, another aspect should not be forgotten:<br />

Interdisciplinarity is related to methodological innovation.<br />

However, these innovations are not published enough<br />

because – again – the peers are missing. Not only the relevance<br />

of R4D but also its scientific impact in developing<br />

thoughts, methodologies, and knowledge is important. In<br />

order to strengthen that outcome we have to develop a<br />

community. For example in Switzerland, the few institutions<br />

involved in R4D have to support each other very strongly<br />

and build capacity together.<br />

Barbara Becker: I would like to come back to my earlier comments<br />

on outputs, outcomes and impacts. When we talk<br />

about R4D, I immediately associate impacts such as poverty<br />

alleviation, or income generation. On the output side,<br />

I think of scientific results which are being taken up by a<br />

community outside the immediate research environment.<br />

This could be with a leaflet, as Bassirou said, and also accidentally,<br />

when somebody comes across a publication and<br />

thinks this could be useful for application. Finally, another<br />

desired output is that the research results are relevant in<br />

some way or other, that they describe a technology, methodology,<br />

or product, which has the potential for application<br />

and implementation.<br />

Urs Wiesmann: Outputs – I think that the important point<br />

is that in R4D you have to have a very broad variety of different<br />

forms of output. As said before, you cannot rely on<br />

journals only. Talking of the outcomes, for me the main outcomes<br />

are capacities in dealing with the research-society<br />

interface, or knowledge-society interface. We need to<br />

couple capacity development directly with the research.<br />

Second, that we see development as a global concern, and<br />

build alliances through that. These alliances among researchers<br />

from all over the world are crucial. We have to build<br />

our own programmes and projects and cannot wait for the<br />

donors to provide us with such programmes. Finally, the<br />

vital goal is to have a more knowledge-based and development-relevant<br />

decision-making – so that knowledge and<br />

not just power is the guiding principle of decision-making.<br />

This has something to do with justice in the sense that the<br />

interests of the most part of society and of the future generations<br />

influence decision-making.<br />

Isabel Guenther: I think the benefit of R4D is that you are<br />

not only tackling scientifically interesting research questions,<br />

but also research questions that are relevant for society.<br />

Many researchers do not see that their research could<br />

be applied to a development context. To put R4D on the<br />

screen of many more researchers might be another output<br />

one could aim for. Lastly, and as Urs said, another important<br />

point is that development policies should more often be<br />

based on knowledge, and therefore research.<br />

Bassirou Bonfoh: For me, the benefit of engaging ourselves<br />

in R4D is that we gain legitimacy vis-à-vis the decision-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!