22.11.2014 Views

mortality responses of spodoptera litura (fab.) (lepidoptera: noctuidae)

mortality responses of spodoptera litura (fab.) (lepidoptera: noctuidae)

mortality responses of spodoptera litura (fab.) (lepidoptera: noctuidae)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pakistan Entomologist<br />

Journal homepage: www.pakentomol.com<br />

MORTALITY RESPONSES OF SPODOPTERA LITURA (FAB.) (LEPIDOPTERA:<br />

NOCTUIDAE) AGAINST SOME CONVENTIONAL AND NEW CHEMISTRY<br />

INSECTICIDES UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS<br />

*<br />

Rashad Rasool Khan, Sohail Ahmed and Shahid Nisar<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agri. Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Faisalabad.<br />

ARTICLE INFORMATION<br />

Received: September 10, 2011<br />

Received in revised form: November 29, 2011<br />

Accepted: December 8, 2011<br />

*<br />

Corresponding Author:<br />

Rashad Rasool Khan<br />

Email: rashad_khan1@yahoo.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The new chemistry and conventional insecticides were evaluated for their efficacy against<br />

the armyworm, Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) in the laboratory. All the evaluated insecticides<br />

proved toxic for S. <strong>litura</strong> under laboratory conditions, but chlorpyrifos, pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os,<br />

emamectin benzoate, spinosad, indoxacarb, methoxyfenozide and lufenuron proved highly<br />

toxic as the exposure time was extended. After 3 days <strong>of</strong> the insecticide treatment, 100%<br />

<strong>mortality</strong> was observed in emamectin benzoate @ 100 and 110 ml/acre treatment, followed<br />

by chlorpyrifos @ 1100 ml/acre (96.56%), leufenuron @ 55 ml/acre (86.67%) and methomyl<br />

@ 440 ml/acre (83.34%). However, chlorpyrifos and emamectin benzoate, at all the three<br />

doses, leufenuron at the higher and recommended dose and thiodicarb, spinosad and<br />

methoxyfenozide, at higher doses, were ranked highly toxic-as these insecticides caused the<br />

highest <strong>mortality</strong> (>90%) in S. <strong>litura</strong>.<br />

Keywords:<br />

Mortality response, Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong>, conventional insecticides, new chemistry<br />

insecticides, laboratory conditions.<br />

INTRODUCTION strategy in case <strong>of</strong> the insects (Denholm and Rowland, 1992).<br />

This tactic has not yet been tested on the field collected<br />

Armyworm (Spodoptera spp., Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) have resistant populations <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera spp.<br />

attained the status <strong>of</strong> the primary insect pest <strong>of</strong> cotton in The present studies report the comparative efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

Pakistan (Ahmad et al., 2007a). Besides cotton, it also attacks pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os (Curacron® 50EC), chlorpyrifos (Lorsban®<br />

on tobacco and crucifers (Hussain and Shah, 1998; Ghaffar et 40EC), methomyl (Lannate® 40SP), thiodicarb (Larvin®<br />

al., 2002; Saeed et al., 2010). Spodoptera exigua and S. <strong>litura</strong> 80DP), lufenuron (Match® 5EC), abamectin (Agrimec®<br />

are important species prevalent in cotton crop.<br />

1.8EC), emamectin benzoate (Proclaim® 1.9EC), spinosad<br />

The insecticides used for the control <strong>of</strong> armyworms includes (Tracer® 24SC), indoxacarb (Steward® 15EC) and<br />

conventional (OPs, permethrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, methoxyfenozide (Runner® 24SC) at 10% low and high<br />

cyhalothrin etc.) and new chemistry insecticides which have recommended field dose rate against Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong>.<br />

become in effective (Ahmad and Arif, 2009; Ahmad et al.,<br />

2007b; Saleem et al., 2008; Shad et al., 2010). MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

In order to mitigate insecticide resistance, several strategies<br />

have been suggested and tested in the field and these novel Insects<br />

strategies must be verified with economic and pest control<br />

data to convince farmers (Gressel et al., 1996). With such The full grown larvae <strong>of</strong> S. <strong>litura</strong> were collected from the<br />

tactics, resistance may be minimized or delayed by preserving cotton crop and were reared at 30±2°C and 65±5% R.H. with<br />

a sufficient population <strong>of</strong> susceptible individuals through the light: darkness ratio <strong>of</strong> 14:10 hrs on a semi-synthetic diet<br />

use <strong>of</strong> lower rates <strong>of</strong> given pesticides and avoid the selection (Ahmad et al., 2005).<br />

<strong>of</strong> recessively resistant heterozygotes. On the other hand, use<br />

<strong>of</strong> high dose is also recommended but as means <strong>of</strong> eliminating Insecticides<br />

or reducing frequency <strong>of</strong> heterozygote where resistance is<br />

dominant (NRC, 1986). A number <strong>of</strong> studies have been The recommended insecticides against Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> on<br />

conducted in this regards with fungicides and rodenticides, a cotton crop in Pakistan were selected for the experimentation.<br />

few were related to managing the resistance by low/high dose The insecticides viz., pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os (Curacron® 50EC),<br />

Cite this article as: Khan, R.R., S. Ahmed and S. Nisar, 2011. Mortality <strong>responses</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) against some<br />

conventional and new chemistry insecticides under laboratory conditions. Pak. Entomol., 33(2): 147-150.<br />

147


Khan et al. / Pakistan Entomologist 2011, 33(2): 147-150<br />

chlorpyrifos (Lorsban® 40EC), methomyl (Lannate® 40SP), level <strong>of</strong> resistance was found in Spodoptera exigua against<br />

thiodicarb (Larvin® 80DP), lufenuron (Match® 5EC), chlorpyrifos.<br />

abamectin (Agrimec® 1.8EC), emamectin benzoate All the larvae treated with the recommended and higher dose<br />

(Proclaim® 1.9EC), spinosad (Tracer® 24SC), indoxacarb rates <strong>of</strong> methomyl were found dead after 7 days <strong>of</strong> its<br />

(Steward® 15EC) and methoxyfenozide (Runner® 24SC) application whereas 83.34 % <strong>mortality</strong> was observed after 7<br />

were obtained in the form <strong>of</strong> their commercial formulations days when the larvae were treated with its lower dose rate<br />

from the respective manufacturers. Three doses for each (360 g/acre). The higher dose rate (440 g/acre) <strong>of</strong> thiodicarb<br />

insecticide i.e., the recommended dose against S. <strong>litura</strong> and<br />

th<br />

caused 93.34 % <strong>mortality</strong> at the 7 day <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

10% below and above the recommended dose rate, were application and the recommended and lower dose rates (400<br />

prepared in an Analar grade Acetone. A control treatment <strong>of</strong> and 360 g/acre) caused 80 and 73.32 % <strong>mortality</strong>,<br />

acetone/distilled water applications was also included, for respectively.<br />

each test, to assess the natural <strong>mortality</strong> rates <strong>of</strong> the test insect Among the new chemistry insecticides, lowest <strong>mortality</strong><br />

species. (53.31%) was found in abamectin (180 ml/acre) even after 7<br />

days <strong>of</strong> its application; however, the <strong>mortality</strong> increased with<br />

Bioassay<br />

an increase in the dose rate. The higher dose rates <strong>of</strong> spinosad<br />

(44 ml/acre) caused 93.33% <strong>mortality</strong> after 7 days, but its<br />

Ten larvae <strong>of</strong> S. <strong>litura</strong> (3rd instar), <strong>of</strong> uniform age, were recommended dose (40 ml/acre) caused 86.66% <strong>mortality</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

exposed to three different concentrations <strong>of</strong> insecticides, the S. <strong>litura</strong> larvae.<br />

using a leaf-dip technique, as recommended by the After 7 days <strong>of</strong> application, the larval <strong>mortality</strong> reached up to<br />

Insecticides Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) <strong>of</strong> GIFAP 83.34% in the larvae treated with higher dose rate <strong>of</strong><br />

(Anonymous, 1990). Unsprayed cotton leaves, were collected indoxacarb (110 ml/acre). Almost the same <strong>mortality</strong><br />

from the field, washed and dipped into the insecticide (83.33%) was observed after 7 days <strong>of</strong> treatment with<br />

(Treatment) solutions, for ten seconds, with a gentle agitation methoxyfenozide (100 ml/acre) and when the dose was<br />

and dried on the tissue papers. The dried leaves were then increased to 110 ml/acre, the <strong>mortality</strong> was 93.23% after 7<br />

placed in the petri dishes having a moist filter paper, in order days <strong>of</strong> application.<br />

to avoid any desiccation. The treatments were observed, after Insecticides like, chlorpyrifos, emamectin benzoate at all<br />

3 and 7 days for their effects. The effects <strong>of</strong> test insecticides three dose rates, lufenuron-at higher and recommended dose<br />

were judged on the basis <strong>of</strong> insect <strong>mortality</strong> levels, after rates and thiodicarb, spinosad and methoxyfenozide-at higher<br />

certain time periods. The data were analyzed statistically at dose rates, were ranked highly toxic, as maximum <strong>mortality</strong><br />

5% level <strong>of</strong> probability using Duncan's Multiple Range Test levels were observed in chlorpyrifos @ 900, 1000 and 1100<br />

and the insecticides were categorized on the basis <strong>of</strong> ml/acre, methomyl @ 400 and 440 g/acre, lufenuron @ 50 and<br />

percentage <strong>mortality</strong>, as; Harmless (90% <strong>mortality</strong>) (Khan, lufenuron @ 45 ml/acre, spinosad @ 44 ml/acre and<br />

2010, unpublished data). methoxyfenozide @ 110 ml/acre, after 7 days <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treatments. Same results were reported by Sparks et al. (1996)<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

for spinosad and emamectin benzoate as well as by<br />

Mascarenhas et al. (1996) for chlorpyrifos and spinosad. The<br />

The data regarding the percentage-<strong>mortality</strong> <strong>of</strong> the larvae <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> present study are also confirmatory to those <strong>of</strong><br />

Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> after 3 and 7 days <strong>of</strong> the insecticide Adamczyk et al., (1999) who reported that the novel<br />

treatments were found significantly different (Table 1). It is insecticides like chlorfenapyr, methoxyfenozide, spinosad<br />

obvious from the data that 100% <strong>mortality</strong> was observed after and tebufenozide were more effective to the pest. The results<br />

3 days <strong>of</strong> treatment application with emamectin benzoate at regarding the indoxacarb in our experiment, were also<br />

the dose rate <strong>of</strong> 100 and 110 ml/acre. While complete comparable to those <strong>of</strong> Hammes et al. (1998) who reported it<br />

<strong>mortality</strong> <strong>of</strong> the larvae was observed after 7 days <strong>of</strong> treatment very effective against S. <strong>litura</strong> and safe to many beneficial<br />

application when larvae were treated at the dose rate <strong>of</strong> 90 insects. The results can also be compared with those <strong>of</strong> Ahmad<br />

ml/acre <strong>of</strong> emmamectin benzoate. The <strong>mortality</strong> was also and Saleem (2004) who reported that amongst new chemistry<br />

found to be 100% after 7 days <strong>of</strong> application at all the dose insecticides, emamectin benzoate and lufenuron resulted in<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> lufenuron. The higher dose rate <strong>of</strong> chlorpyrifos (1100 maximum <strong>mortality</strong> <strong>of</strong> S. <strong>litura</strong>. Ahmad et al., (2005) also<br />

ml/acre) also proved highly toxic as 96.56 % <strong>mortality</strong> was reported that emamectin benzoate proved to be the best<br />

observed in the treated larvae after 3 days. The <strong>mortality</strong> <strong>of</strong> the insecticide followed by lufenuron, spinosad and indoxacarb,<br />

larvae reached 100% after 7 days in all the treatments <strong>of</strong> respectively in their time-oriented <strong>mortality</strong> at three<br />

chlorpyrifos. However, the lower dose rate <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os (450 concentration levels against S. <strong>litura</strong>; however, abamectin<br />

ml/acre) proved slightly toxic as the treatments caused 66.67 proved to be the least effective to control this pest.<br />

% <strong>mortality</strong> even after 7 days <strong>of</strong> its application. The results These results also support our findings. The overall results <strong>of</strong><br />

documented by Ahmad and Arif (2009) are in partial this study suggest emamectin benzoate as the best insecticide<br />

agreement with our findings. They reported very low or no along with other new chemistry insecticides a long- lasting<br />

resistance in Earias vittella to emamectin benzoate and control tactic for the farming community against S. litua.<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os. Ahmad and Arif (2010) reported that very low Lufenuron, indoxacarb, methoxy fenozide and spinosad also<br />

Cite this article as: Khan, R.R., S. Ahmed and S. Nisar, 2011. Mortality <strong>responses</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) against some<br />

conventional and new chemistry insecticides under laboratory conditions. Pak. Entomol., 33(2): 147-150.<br />

148


Khan et al. / Pakistan Entomologist 2011, 33(2): 147-150<br />

proved to be the effective insecticides after emamectin, respectively.<br />

Table. 1<br />

Percentage <strong>mortality</strong> (means±SE) <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> after 3 and 7 days <strong>of</strong> the insecticide applications.<br />

Treatments Insecticides Dose<br />

(g or ml /acre)<br />

T1<br />

T2<br />

T3<br />

T4<br />

T5<br />

T6<br />

T7<br />

T8<br />

T9<br />

T10<br />

T11<br />

T12<br />

T13<br />

T14<br />

T15<br />

T16<br />

T17<br />

T18<br />

T19<br />

T20<br />

T21<br />

T22<br />

T23<br />

T24<br />

T25<br />

T26<br />

T27<br />

T28<br />

T29<br />

T30<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os (Curacron 50EC)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os (Curacron 50EC)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>en<strong>of</strong>os (Curacron 50EC)<br />

Chlorpyrifos (Lorsban 40EC)<br />

Chlorpyrifos (Lorsban 40EC)<br />

Chlorpyrifos (Lorsban 40EC)<br />

Methomyl (Lennate 40SP)<br />

Methomyl (Lennate 40SP)<br />

Methomyl (Lennate 40SP)<br />

Thiodicarb (Larvin 80DP)<br />

Thiodicarb (Larvin 80DP)<br />

Thiodicarb (Larvin 80DP)<br />

Lufenuron (Match 5EC)<br />

Lufenuron (Match 5EC)<br />

Lufenuron (Match 5EC)<br />

Abamectin (Agrimec 1.8EC)<br />

Abamectin (Agrimec 1.8EC)<br />

Abamectin (Agrimec 1.8EC)<br />

Emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 1.9EC)<br />

Emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 1.9EC)<br />

Emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 1.9EC)<br />

Spinosad (Tracer 24SC)<br />

Spinosad (Tracer 24SC)<br />

Spinosad (Tracer 24SC)<br />

Indoxacarb (Steward 15SC)<br />

Indoxacarb (Steward 15SC)<br />

Indoxacarb (Steward 15SC)<br />

Methoxyfenozide (Runner 24SC)<br />

Methoxyfenozide (Runner 24SC)<br />

Methoxyfenozide (Runner 24SC)<br />

Mortality (%)<br />

(means±SE)<br />

3 DAA<br />

Mortality (%)<br />

(means±SE)<br />

7 DAA<br />

450 36.67±3.33l<br />

66.67±3.33efg<br />

500 46.68±3.34jkl<br />

76.67±3.35cdef<br />

550 53.34±3.32hijkl 86.66±3.31abc<br />

900 73.33±3.35cdefg 100.00±0.00a<br />

100 83.23±2.34ab<br />

100.00±0.00a<br />

1100 96.56±2.33ab<br />

100.00±0.00a<br />

360 63.32±4.13efghij 83.34±3.33bcd<br />

400 76.67±3.32cdefg 100.00±0.00a<br />

440 83.34±3.33abcd 100.00±0.00a<br />

360 66.67±6.27defghi 73.32±3.34cdef<br />

400 73.31±3.33cdefg 80.00±0.00bcde<br />

440 80.21±1.20bcde 93.34±3.35ab<br />

45 66.67±3.33defghi 93.33±3.23ab<br />

50 76.62±3.31cdef 100.00±0.00a<br />

55 86.67±3.35abc 100.00±0.00a<br />

180 36.65±3.23l<br />

53.31±3.35g<br />

200 43.33±2.36kl<br />

63.34±3.36fg<br />

220 50.00±1.20ijkl 73.41±4.12cdef<br />

90 83.31±3.34abcd 100.00±0.00a<br />

100 100.00±0.00a<br />

100.00±0.00a<br />

110 100.00±0.00a<br />

100.00±0.00a<br />

36 66.67±3.33defghi 76.67±3.33cdef<br />

40 70.00±0.00cdefgh 86.66±3.32abc<br />

44 76.57±2.89cdef 93.33±3.33ab<br />

90 53.36±3.31hijkl 70.00±0.00def<br />

100 60.00±1.02fghijk 76.68±3.36cdef<br />

110 66.67±3.29defghi 83.34±3.34bcd<br />

90 56.67±3.31cdefgh 76.59±4.33cdef<br />

100 70.00±0.00cdefgh 83.33±3.33bcd<br />

110 76.67±2.91cdef 93.23±3.29ab<br />

T31<br />

Control<br />

0.00±0.00m<br />

Column wise means sharing similar letters do not differ significantly, at 0.05 probability level.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Adamczyk, J.J., J.R. Leonard and J.B.G. Raves, 1999. Toxicity <strong>of</strong><br />

selected insecticides to fall armyworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)<br />

in laboratory bioassay studies. Florida Ento., 82(2): 230-236.<br />

Ahmad, M. and M.A. Saleem, 2004. Comparative efficacy <strong>of</strong> ten<br />

conventional and new chemistry insecticides against armyworm,<br />

0.000±0.000h<br />

Cite this article as: Khan, R.R., S. Ahmed and S. Nisar, 2011. Mortality <strong>responses</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) against some<br />

conventional and new chemistry insecticides under laboratory conditions. Pak. Entomol., 33(2): 147-150.<br />

149<br />

Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under<br />

laboratory conditions. Pak. Entomol., 26(2): 1-4.<br />

Ahmad, M., M.A. Saleem and M. Ahmad, 2005. Time - oriented<br />

<strong>mortality</strong> in leafworm, Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) (Lepidoptera:<br />

Noctuidae) by some new chemistry insecticides. Pak. Entomol.,<br />

27(1):67-70.<br />

Ahmad, M., A.H. Sayyed, N. Crickmore, and M.A. Saleem, 2007b.


Khan et al. / Pakistan Entomologist 2011, 33(2): 147-150<br />

Genetics and mechanism <strong>of</strong> resistance to deltamethrin in a field Hammes, G.G., D. Sherrod, D. Marsden, P. Dugger and D. Richter,<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest 1998. Steward a novel new insecticide for cotton insect control.<br />

Manag. Sci., 63: 1002–1010. Proc. beltwide cott. conf., San Diego, California. V. 2: pp 1275-<br />

Ahmad, M., M.I. Arif and M. Ahmad, 2007a. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> 1276.<br />

insecticide resistance in field populations <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> Hussain, Z. and A.Q. Shah, 1998. Insect pests control <strong>of</strong> tobacco<br />

(Lepidoperta: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Crop Prot., 26: 809-817. seedbed. Pak. Tobacco, 22: 17-22<br />

Ahmad, M., and M.I. Arif. 2009. Resistance <strong>of</strong> Pakistani field Mascarenhas, V.J., B.R. Leonard, E. Burris and J.B. Graves, 1996.<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> spotted bollworm Erias vitella (Lepidoptera: Beet armyworm control on cotton in Lousiana. Lousiana State<br />

Noctuidae) to pyrethroids, organophosphorous and new University, Agricutural Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology.,<br />

chemistry insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci., 65: 433-439. 79(3): 336-343.<br />

Ahmad, M., and M.I. Arif. 2010. Resistance <strong>of</strong> beet armyworm National Research Council, 1986. Pesticide resistance: Strategies<br />

Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to endosulfan, and tactics for management committee on strategies for the<br />

organophosphorous and pyrethroid insecticides in Pakistan. Crop management <strong>of</strong> pesticide resistant pest populations. U.S. Nuclear<br />

Prot., 29: 1428-1433. Regulatory Commission Washington, DC, USA. Pp. 316-317.<br />

Anonymous, 1990. Proposed insecticides/acaricide susceptibility Saeed, S., A.H. Sayyed and I. Ahmad, 2010. Effect <strong>of</strong> host plants on<br />

tests. IRAC method No. 7. Bull., Eur. Plant Prot. Org., 20: 399- life-history traits <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)<br />

400. J. Pest Sci., 83 (2): 165-172.<br />

Denholm I. and M.W. Rowland, 1992. Tactics for managing Saleem, M.A., M. Ahmad, M. Ahmad, M. Aslam, and A.H. Sayyed,<br />

pesticide resistance in arthropods: Theory and practice. Annu. 2008. Resistance to selected organochlorine, organophosphate,<br />

Rev. Entomol., 37:91-112<br />

carbamate and pyrethroid in Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Lepidoptera:<br />

Ghaffar, A., M.B. Attique, M.R. Naveed and M.T. Jan, 2002. Host Noctuidae) from Pakistan. J. Econ. Entomol., 101: 1667-1675.<br />

range and population dynamics <strong>of</strong> beet armyworm, Spodoptera Shad, A.S., A.H. Sayyed, and M.A. Saleem, 2010. Cross-resistance,<br />

exigua, in cotton agroecosystem <strong>of</strong> Punjab [Pakistan]. Pak. J. mode <strong>of</strong> inheritance and stability <strong>of</strong> resistance to emamectin in<br />

Zool., 34: 209-213. Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci., 64:<br />

Gressel, J., S.N. Gardner and M. Mangel, 1996. Prevention versus 839-846.<br />

remediation in resistance management. In: Molecular Genetics Sparks, A.N., J.W. Norman and D.A. Wolfenbarger, 1996. Efficacy<br />

And Evolution Of Pesticide Resistance, Chapter 18, pp 169-186. <strong>of</strong> selected insecticides against the beet armyworm, Spodoptera<br />

ACS ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 645. American Chemical exigua, field and laboratory evaluations. Proc. beltwide cott.<br />

Society, Washington DC, USA. conf., Nashville, TN, USA, 2: 844-846.<br />

Cite this article as: Khan, R.R., S. Ahmed and S. Nisar, 2011. Mortality <strong>responses</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera <strong>litura</strong> (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) against some<br />

conventional and new chemistry insecticides under laboratory conditions. Pak. Entomol., 33(2): 147-150.<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!