Download Annotated Presentation Slides - National Institute of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Revise or APPEAL? " With regard to the initial review, after examining the summary statement containing the results of that review for the grant application, an investigator may have concerns about, and wish to contest a procedural aspect of the process…, .. that the review was biased, that conflict of interest existed, that the review group lacked appropriate expertise, that factual errors entered into the review."
Revising the Application • Revisions should be substantive • Sources for revision – Summary statement comments – New preliminary data – Recent findings from others – Colleagues reviews of statement and application – Re-review of all aspects application
Page 1 and 2: Responding to Enhanced Peer Review
Page 3 and 4: The Summary Statement • The offic
Page 5 and 6: PROGRAM CONTACT: Jane Doe 301-594-5
Page 7 and 8: 1 R01 NR0222-01 Smith, A CRITIQUE 1
Page 9 and 10: Can you Believe this Summary Statem
Page 11 and 12: Attitude for Interpreting Comments?
Page 13 and 14: Can you Believe this Summary Statem
Page 15 and 16: Major Flaws: Research Grant Awards
Page 17 and 18: Major Flaws: Training and Career Aw
Page 19 and 20: Fixable Problems? • Poor Writing
Page 21 and 22: Reviewers Note Fixable Problems •
Page 23 and 24: Deconstructing the Summary Statemen
Page 25 and 26: Advice from Program Director Questi
Page 27 and 28: Advice from Program Director Progra
Page 29: What if Reviewer is Wrong? Poor pre
Page 33 and 34: Revising the Application: Be Mindfu
Page 35 and 36: Is it Best to Resubmit ASAP? • Ar
Page 37 and 38: After Revision…Remember • Membe

Download Annotated Presentation Slides - National Institute of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?