Download Annotated Presentation Slides - National Institute of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Is it Worth Fixing? • Major Flaws • Lack of reviewer enthusiasm • Fixable problems
Major Flaws: Research Grant Awards • Work has already been done • Hypotheses or Questions not supported by data • Methods are not suitable • Insufficient statistical power • Lack luster of past productivity of investigators • Poor resources or facilities
Page 1 and 2: Responding to Enhanced Peer Review
Page 3 and 4: The Summary Statement • The offic
Page 5 and 6: PROGRAM CONTACT: Jane Doe 301-594-5
Page 7 and 8: 1 R01 NR0222-01 Smith, A CRITIQUE 1
Page 9 and 10: Can you Believe this Summary Statem
Page 11 and 12: Attitude for Interpreting Comments?
Page 13: Can you Believe this Summary Statem
Page 17 and 18: Major Flaws: Training and Career Aw
Page 19 and 20: Fixable Problems? • Poor Writing
Page 21 and 22: Reviewers Note Fixable Problems •
Page 23 and 24: Deconstructing the Summary Statemen
Page 25 and 26: Advice from Program Director Questi
Page 27 and 28: Advice from Program Director Progra
Page 29 and 30: What if Reviewer is Wrong? Poor pre
Page 31 and 32: Revising the Application • Revisi
Page 33 and 34: Revising the Application: Be Mindfu
Page 35 and 36: Is it Best to Resubmit ASAP? • Ar
Page 37 and 38: After Revision…Remember • Membe

Download Annotated Presentation Slides - National Institute of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?