21.11.2014 Views

Mary Masterman - Oklahoma Biological Survey - University of ...

Mary Masterman - Oklahoma Biological Survey - University of ...

Mary Masterman - Oklahoma Biological Survey - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Raman Instrumentation<br />

4<br />

Raman systems are generally composed <strong>of</strong> several main parts, as follows.<br />

A. The excitation source (laser).<br />

Lasers make modern Raman feasible because they give a coherent beam <strong>of</strong> monochromatic light and can have very high power.<br />

They must be <strong>of</strong> sufficient intensity to produce the desired and detectable amount <strong>of</strong> Raman scatter, and they should be free <strong>of</strong><br />

extraneous bands. They should thus exhibit good wavelength stability and low background emission.<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> a Raman shift is independent <strong>of</strong> the laser wavelength used for excitation. This is an important concept in<br />

Raman. In Raman, unlike electronic spectroscopy, wavelengths are not normally measured in Angstroms or nanometers. Since the<br />

frequency shift, not the actual frequency, is what is important, Raman spectra are generally plots <strong>of</strong> intensity versus wavenumber:<br />

, where c is the speed <strong>of</strong> light in cm/s and v is the frequency in s^-1. (4) Since it is independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the laser wavelength, the wavenumber will be the same for a 532 nm or a 785 nm laser. The wavelength difference for a<br />

particular band, however, is not necessarily the same. For instance, a wavenumber <strong>of</strong> 1000 cm^-1 for a 532 nm laser would result in<br />

a Stokes band ~30 nm away from the laser line. But the same wavenumber for a1064 nm laser would result in a Stokes band ~130<br />

nm away from the laser line.<br />

Intensity <strong>of</strong> the Raman signal is inversely proportional to the 4 th power <strong>of</strong> the laser wavelength (3):<br />

. It would seem,<br />

then, that laser radiation <strong>of</strong> a high frequency would be ideal. However, since samples tend to fluoresce at higher-frequency<br />

wavelengths, and since fluorescence is a much more efficient process than Raman, this is not necessarily true. Thus, infrared lasers<br />

have become increasingly popular in Raman, despite their low frequencies. On the other hand, it has also been demonstrated that at<br />

wavelengths under 260 nm, there is essentially no fluorescence interference (3); so ultraviolet lasers have the benefits <strong>of</strong> stimulating<br />

strong Raman scattering and not causing samples to fluoresce.<br />

B. System to irradiate sample and collect scattered light (three types <strong>of</strong> filters).<br />

Light from the laser is generally passed through an excitation filter in Raman systems. The excitation filter purifies the laser<br />

beam by permitting light only <strong>of</strong> a very small selected wavelength range to pass through, eliminating background emission (1).<br />

Excitation filters may be Short-Wave-Pass (only extraneous light <strong>of</strong> longer Stokes wavelengths than the laser is blocked) or Laser-<br />

Line (extraneous light <strong>of</strong> wavelengths shorter and longer than the laser is blocked) (5).<br />

After passing through an excitation filter, the laser beam is usually focused on the sample in order to increase the intensity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

electric field on the sample surface (the magnetic component <strong>of</strong> the electromagnetic radiation is generally not relevant to Raman)<br />

(4). Raman scattered light is then collected and passed through a barrier filter. The barrier filter prevents Rayleigh-scattered light <strong>of</strong><br />

the same wavelength as the laser form passing on to the slit <strong>of</strong> the spectrograph (the Rayleigh scattering is so much more intense<br />

than the Raman that it would saturate the CCD chip).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!