Rezumatul tezei de doctorat - USAMV Cluj-Napoca
Rezumatul tezei de doctorat - USAMV Cluj-Napoca Rezumatul tezei de doctorat - USAMV Cluj-Napoca
50. Oroian, T.E., 2006, SelecŃia asistată de markeri la crap, Ed. Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca, 180 pg.; 51. Oroian, T.E., Oroian, R.G., Cristina Hegeduş, Cighi, V., Dronca, D., 2009, The monitoring of phytoplankton evolution by biological year within Arinis-Maramures fishery complex, International symposium “Modern animal husbandry-science, creativity and innovation”, Lucrări ştiinŃifice seria Zootehnie, USAMV Iaşi, cotaŃie CNCSIS B+, 52:14, 456-461; 52. Paul, B., Monica M. Steciow, 2004, Saprolegnia multispora, a new oomycete isolated from water samples taken in a river in the Burgundian region of France, FEMS Microbiology Letters, 237, 393–398; 53. Ristaino, J.B., Madritch, M., Trout, C.L., Parra, G., 1998, PCR amplification of ribosomal DNA for species identification in the plant pathogen genus Phytophthora, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64:3, 948-954; 54. Stueland, S., Hatai, K., Skaar, I., 2005, Morphological and physiological characteristics of Saprolegnia spp. strains pathogenic to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., Journal of Fish Diseases, 28, 445-453; 55. Vlaic, A., 2007, Genetica peştilor, Ed. Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca, 150 pg.; 56. White, P.L., Barton, R., Guiver, M., Linton, C.J., Wilson, S., Smith, M., Beatriz L. Gomez, Carr, M.J., Kimmitt, P.T., Shila Seaton, Rajakumar, K., Tessa Holyoake, Chris C. Kibbler, Elizabeth Johnson, Hobson, R.P., Jones, B., Rosemary A. Barnes, 2006, A consensus on fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction diagnosis, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 8:3, 376-384; 57. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., Taylor, J., 1990, Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J., White, T.J. (Eds) PCR protocols (pg 315–322), Academic Press, San Diego; 58. *** http://www.fermentas.com 59. *** http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 60. *** http://www.qiagen.com 78
61. *** http://www.sigmaaldrich.com 62. ***http://www.tnfish.org/FishDiseasesParasites_TWRA/files/Saprolegnia.pdf 79
- Page 27 and 28: II.7. REZULTATE PRIVIND STUDIUL ÎN
- Page 29 and 30: mai mare genetică, indivizii despr
- Page 31 and 32: MenŃionăm faptul că în toate ba
- Page 33 and 34: CAPITOLUL III CONCLUZII ŞI RECOMAN
- Page 35 and 36: isexualis (761 pb, o identitate de
- Page 37 and 38: BIBLIOGRAFIE SELECTIVĂ 1. Colao Ma
- Page 39 and 40: 19. Oroian, T.E., 2006, SelecŃia a
- Page 41 and 42: UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
- Page 43 and 44: SPECIES FROM SAPROLEGNIACEAE FAMILY
- Page 45 and 46: The specific literature presents up
- Page 47 and 48: Fig.1. The locations where the rese
- Page 49 and 50: estimation of the spawns infestatio
- Page 51 and 52: pellets were filtred, washed with d
- Page 53 and 54: The DNA rapid extraction using PBS
- Page 55 and 56: We used a comparatively mixture of
- Page 57 and 58: II.1. THE RESULTS OF SAPROLEGNIA CU
- Page 59 and 60: Reading time 24 48 72 n Culture med
- Page 61 and 62: asexual one. We can precisely concl
- Page 63 and 64: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 700pb- Fig.3. Ele
- Page 65 and 66: pairs length. The sequencing result
- Page 67 and 68: II.7. RESULTS REGARDING THE GENETIC
- Page 69 and 70: higher genetic distance, the indivi
- Page 71 and 72: We mention the fact that in al the
- Page 73 and 74: extraction have values between 1,10
- Page 75 and 76: 13. In researches on the aquatic fu
- Page 77: 40. Frisvad, J.C., Bridge, P.D., Ar
61. *** http://www.sigmaaldrich.com<br />
62. ***http://www.tnfish.org/FishDiseasesParasites_TWRA/files/Saprolegnia.pdf<br />
79
Change language